1⁄16Trumpeter M16 Halftrack
5
Comments
Rear (fighting) Compartment
The rubber rear “fenders” (mud flaps) should be installed, along with the taillights and sponson covers during step 18. I gave my mudflaps a “beating” by chewing them a tad before installing. Other than nasty, unused screw holes, the inside of the rear wall is devoid of any detail. The screws in the rear deck are counter-sunk, but I hid them with a smear of putty.
You will now notice the fold-down flaps of the rear fighting compartment are molded as part of the walls, and the joints are not represented on the inside walls. You will have to scribe a straight groove. Most wartime photos show these flaps in the down position.
Much time will now be devoted to carefully removing molded –on detail from storage bins and the tailgate before replacing it with various PE clasps and straps. The taillights are well executed, having clear lenses which can be painted with transparent red.
I next constructed all those ammunition containers. The seams in the “tombstone” ammo cans (J1& J2) needed much filling and sanding. I found it annoying that four of the twelve ammo cans (parts J5 and J6) are moulded so as to have no visible seams. Why couldn’t they all have been moulded seamlessly? The carry handles are moulded-on, and no ammunition belts are provided. Four of the spare ammo cans fit into a very nice PE tray (Step 30). Two types of .50 caliber gun barrels are included. I removed the carrying handles from four gun barrels and mounted them as spares on the rear compartment walls.
The fuel tanks are moulded into the rear compartment interior. The filler cap detail is also moulded-on, but looks fine after painting. The metal shroud that covers the fuel tanks could stand to be replaced with thin brass, or the like.
Radios fitted to US half-tracks were either SCR-510 or SCR-528 units. What is given in the kit resembles neither, so I spent a weekend building a 510 unit from balsa wood and spares. A real unit is shown below:
Comments
Thank you Ted,for the write up. I too made those fixes you described.
I made my own gun solenoids,and used images from Hunnicutt's halftrack book,to lead the wires into the mount.
My track is a bit tighter around the running gear,I hid the "joint" in the sprocket area. Also,I used fine fishing line to tie down the track to the sprocket and idler,this helped the overall view.
I noticed there was a top radiator hose,but no lower.The connection point on the engine is there,so I made one from a piece of wire which had black insulation on it. Also I had to fabricate an adjustment bar for the generator,as there was none on the engine.
I suppose for the missing ammo belts,a series of round sections of styrene rod,or stretched sprue glued side by side would be good to use as a substitute.
JUN 11, 2009 - 11:36 AM
Very awesome build and write-up! I couldn't read the whole article tonight, but what I saw I did like and saved it to my favorites. I also am into 1/16th kits and have been eyeing this one for awhile and can't decide on it or waiting for the R/C version, which is slated to be released later this year.
Lots of tips so thanks for sharing it with us!
JUN 11, 2009 - 01:18 PM
Not to detract from the amazing work done on this huge model, but the 50th Artillery Battalion (Automatic Weapons, Self Propelled) did exist. There are a number of references to this unit in Korea. It would have been equipped with the M16 during that time frame as well.
Also the M55 designation applied only to the M45C mount + the M20 trailer.
Regardless, this is a truly impressive piece and thanks for sharing.
JUN 12, 2009 - 04:12 AM
Thank you!!!!
I've been looking for one of these blogs, good job Ted.
We still have the track problem, anybody find a good way around this?
Dan
JUN 12, 2009 - 11:43 AM
I'm very surprised that the AM folks haven't jumped to produce extras for this kit. It's many flaws aside, it still has no rivals in this scale. I was shocked. however, to see how much it's selling for in your part of the world. For my money, I'd rather save-up and get the 1/16th King Tiger instead -far better value-for-money!
JUN 12, 2009 - 03:32 PM
Copyright ©2021 by Ted Hayward. Images and/or videos also by copyright holder unless otherwise noted. The views and opinions expressed herein are solely the views and opinions of the authors and/or contributors to this Web site and do not necessarily represent the views and/or opinions of Armorama, KitMaker Network, or Silver Star Enterrpises. All rights reserved. Originally published on: 2009-06-11 00:00:00. Unique Reads: 27080