Hi Guys,
A while ago, my good friend Avukich talked me into doing a Russian group build of the T35, which were take part by Octupus, Adam, and also Kevin (Tank46, whom is doing an 1/87 scaled one)
I think today might be a good date for showcasing the first entry. This is ICM T-35 with eduard PE, Friul track and Judio Barrels. I had put the tracks backwards, because it's how it should be done on an German Panzer!!!! Oh well, my bad, and there is no way to correct it now.... #:-) Maybe a Russian mechanic on too many vodka....
As why the Russian needed such a super machine in face of tiny Pz I, Pz II, III and IVs, I don't know.....
Constructive Feedback
For in-progress or completed build photos. Give and get contructive feedback!
For in-progress or completed build photos. Give and get contructive feedback!
Hosted by Darren Baker, Dave O'Meara
May 1st Parade - T35 group build
SS-74
Vatican City
Joined: May 13, 2002
KitMaker: 3,271 posts
Armorama: 2,388 posts
Joined: May 13, 2002
KitMaker: 3,271 posts
Armorama: 2,388 posts
Posted: Thursday, May 01, 2003 - 04:59 AM UTC
m60a3
Georgia, United States
Joined: March 08, 2002
KitMaker: 778 posts
Armorama: 396 posts
Joined: March 08, 2002
KitMaker: 778 posts
Armorama: 396 posts
Posted: Thursday, May 01, 2003 - 05:23 AM UTC
Just smashing, sir! Great work Dave!
I need a tetanus shot after looking at the muffler.
Your whitewash and weathering technique is very effective!
I need a tetanus shot after looking at the muffler.
Your whitewash and weathering technique is very effective!
slodder
North Carolina, United States
Joined: February 22, 2002
KitMaker: 11,718 posts
Armorama: 7,138 posts
Joined: February 22, 2002
KitMaker: 11,718 posts
Armorama: 7,138 posts
Posted: Thursday, May 01, 2003 - 05:44 AM UTC
What a beast. The weathering is awsome.
On the last picture it looks like the track is pulled out away from the kit? The others look fine so I'm guessing its the photo?
Great job.
On the last picture it looks like the track is pulled out away from the kit? The others look fine so I'm guessing its the photo?
Great job.
Davhowell
Tennessee, United States
Joined: March 10, 2003
KitMaker: 268 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: March 10, 2003
KitMaker: 268 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Thursday, May 01, 2003 - 05:59 AM UTC
As Always Dave Amazing work! Great Weathering Looks like the real thing!
Dmd
Oost-Vlaanderen, Belgium
Joined: September 18, 2002
KitMaker: 430 posts
Armorama: 210 posts
Joined: September 18, 2002
KitMaker: 430 posts
Armorama: 210 posts
Posted: Thursday, May 01, 2003 - 07:04 AM UTC
nice work davidus, i wish i could participated with group bilds, but things get so Xpensive over here that i could not effort it
soooo i like your work
bye bye
dmd
soooo i like your work
bye bye
dmd
WeWillHold
Wisconsin, United States
Joined: April 17, 2002
KitMaker: 2,314 posts
Armorama: 1,905 posts
Joined: April 17, 2002
KitMaker: 2,314 posts
Armorama: 1,905 posts
Posted: Thursday, May 01, 2003 - 07:19 AM UTC
My Brother Dave:
Another effort that shows your versatility. Congrats.
D-ynamite Modeling
A-wesome paint job
V-ery Impressive beastie
E-lectrifying Super Machine
T-ank
O-utstanding weathering
N-eat
G-REAT JOB DAVE!!!
Steve
Another effort that shows your versatility. Congrats.
D-ynamite Modeling
A-wesome paint job
V-ery Impressive beastie
E-lectrifying Super Machine
T-ank
O-utstanding weathering
N-eat
G-REAT JOB DAVE!!!
Steve
MrRoo
Queensland, Australia
Joined: October 07, 2002
KitMaker: 3,856 posts
Armorama: 2,984 posts
Joined: October 07, 2002
KitMaker: 3,856 posts
Armorama: 2,984 posts
Posted: Thursday, May 01, 2003 - 08:47 AM UTC
Quoted Text
My Brother Dave:
Another effort that shows your versatility. Congrats.
Steve
hmmm I agree. but!!!!!.....................still no trucks huh!
Desert-Fox
England - South East, United Kingdom
Joined: October 22, 2002
KitMaker: 652 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: October 22, 2002
KitMaker: 652 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Thursday, May 01, 2003 - 08:48 AM UTC
Impressive Dave. I especially like the smoke effect from the exhaust area.
Have you considered some chipping? I know what you're saying..."He always says that..." But it does add to the effect.
You really are a connoisseur of the model trade .
Nice1
Have you considered some chipping? I know what you're saying..."He always says that..." But it does add to the effect.
You really are a connoisseur of the model trade .
Nice1
TankCarl
Rhode Island, United States
Joined: May 10, 2002
KitMaker: 3,581 posts
Armorama: 2,782 posts
Joined: May 10, 2002
KitMaker: 3,581 posts
Armorama: 2,782 posts
Posted: Thursday, May 01, 2003 - 10:06 AM UTC
SQUEEEAL!
Very nice dave indeed.And it isn't even german.
T-35,# 35 Wor Hep Har. Egg Roll,Fried Rice.
Very nice dave indeed.And it isn't even german.
T-35,# 35 Wor Hep Har. Egg Roll,Fried Rice.
PorkChop
Wisconsin, United States
Joined: September 11, 2002
KitMaker: 3,179 posts
Armorama: 1 posts
Joined: September 11, 2002
KitMaker: 3,179 posts
Armorama: 1 posts
Posted: Thursday, May 01, 2003 - 10:15 AM UTC
Gawd that tank is UGLY!!!!
But you did a gret job on it Dave!!!
Nate
But you did a gret job on it Dave!!!
Nate
Oberst
Ontario, Canada
Joined: June 26, 2002
KitMaker: 851 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: June 26, 2002
KitMaker: 851 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Thursday, May 01, 2003 - 10:39 AM UTC
Dave, I have never done a winter scheme but it seems you have done a good job. Did you incorporate the suggestions I made? Anyways, it is good to see you doing armour again, albeit Russian
Nice work,
Andrew
Nice work,
Andrew
Graywolf
Senior Editor
Izmir, Turkey / Türkçe
Joined: December 01, 2001
KitMaker: 6,405 posts
Armorama: 1,850 posts
Joined: December 01, 2001
KitMaker: 6,405 posts
Armorama: 1,850 posts
Posted: Thursday, May 01, 2003 - 10:40 AM UTC
and..the oscar goes to Dave...great job..this is one of the best weathered models I have ever seen
BroAbrams
Washington, United States
Joined: October 02, 2002
KitMaker: 1,546 posts
Armorama: 1,081 posts
Joined: October 02, 2002
KitMaker: 1,546 posts
Armorama: 1,081 posts
Posted: Thursday, May 01, 2003 - 10:44 AM UTC
Now thats one ugly mother. But it looks good Dave.
merkava8
Alberta, Canada
Joined: September 25, 2002
KitMaker: 501 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: September 25, 2002
KitMaker: 501 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Thursday, May 01, 2003 - 03:01 PM UTC
He's back!!!!! He's really really back!!! #:-) #:-)
Nice Dave!
Nice Dave!
Tanks46
New Jersey, United States
Joined: June 02, 2002
KitMaker: 113 posts
Armorama: 98 posts
Joined: June 02, 2002
KitMaker: 113 posts
Armorama: 98 posts
Posted: Thursday, May 01, 2003 - 05:33 PM UTC
Great big beautiful and ugly! Great job my friend I take inspiration from your creativity. I should finish the mini-me in the next week. Sorry for the delay got a little crazy this week!.
Weathering is excellent!
Butch Cassidy - Tanks46
Pig#3 Head Armorer
DSB
Weathering is excellent!
Quoted Text
If it comes to a mine field our infantry attacks as if it were not there. Zhukov
Butch Cassidy - Tanks46
Pig#3 Head Armorer
DSB
andy007
Wellington, New Zealand
Joined: May 01, 2002
KitMaker: 2,088 posts
Armorama: 1,257 posts
Joined: May 01, 2002
KitMaker: 2,088 posts
Armorama: 1,257 posts
Posted: Thursday, May 01, 2003 - 08:36 PM UTC
dave
That is awesome the weathering is brilliant . The tank has enough turrets!!
how did you do the streaks?
That is awesome the weathering is brilliant . The tank has enough turrets!!
how did you do the streaks?
warlock0322
North Carolina, United States
Joined: January 13, 2003
KitMaker: 1,036 posts
Armorama: 153 posts
Joined: January 13, 2003
KitMaker: 1,036 posts
Armorama: 153 posts
Posted: Thursday, May 01, 2003 - 08:55 PM UTC
very nice work Dave I bow at your feet with your versatility in the model realm..Just outstanding work.. Even though it a tank #:-)
Sabot
Joined: December 18, 2001
KitMaker: 12,596 posts
Armorama: 9,071 posts
KitMaker: 12,596 posts
Armorama: 9,071 posts
Posted: Thursday, May 01, 2003 - 11:31 PM UTC
Very nice, looks like a gunboat or small battleship. I think you did a great job!
penpen
Hauts-de-Seine, France
Joined: April 11, 2002
KitMaker: 1,757 posts
Armorama: 929 posts
Joined: April 11, 2002
KitMaker: 1,757 posts
Armorama: 929 posts
Posted: Thursday, May 01, 2003 - 11:31 PM UTC
Good job Dave !
octupus
Hong Kong S.A.R. / 繁體
Joined: June 19, 2002
KitMaker: 411 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: June 19, 2002
KitMaker: 411 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Friday, May 02, 2003 - 02:44 AM UTC
Davidus,
Hey pal, howcome you made the Ugly Beast so pretty? Your paint job is amazing. I will start my paint job soon, so that I can post the pics later.
Hey pal, howcome you made the Ugly Beast so pretty? Your paint job is amazing. I will start my paint job soon, so that I can post the pics later.
Posted: Friday, May 02, 2003 - 04:46 AM UTC
dave, the model is as beautiful as the tank is ugly... You have done an awesome job there man... incredible...
:-H
Harm
:-H
Harm
Posted: Friday, May 02, 2003 - 12:08 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Very nice, looks like a gunboat or small battleship.
Dont know/remember the full story, but I believe this is the direction that Stalin wanted to go. The russians were trying to develop tanks with more firepower. They made one that had about 4 turrets. It was huge. Thing was, when all turrets fired at the one time, the recoil knocked the tank back onto its side. Also it was so long, I believe it broke in 2 when going over some bump.
Anybody else shine some light on this? This was talked about on our IPMS homepage some time ago. I will look back for it to see if its still there!
Posted: Friday, May 02, 2003 - 12:53 PM UTC
This is what i was talking about:
The true story about the KV-VI
Since the collapse of the Soviet Union, new facts have surfaced about the secret weapons developed by the Red Army during WWII. One of the most fascinating of these was the KV-VI Behemoth. In July 1941, Stalin learned of a single KV-II that had held off the entire 6th Panzer Division for more than a day. With the incredible success of this single tank, Stalin ordered a crash program for a land battleship based on the KV-II design. It was to have three turrets and be very heavily armed and armored and able to defend itself against all types of attack. The project was given to the joint team of Kotin/Barkov. When the designers complained to Stalin that the insistence on three turrets made the vehicle too long to have an acceptable turning radius, Stalin's answer was: "It doesn't need to turn, it will drive straight to Berlin." The final design became known as the KV-VI "Behemoth". The KV-VI was a multi-turreted tank using components of the KV-I and II, Bt-5, T-60, and T-38. The use of existing tank designs was necessary because of pressure from Stalin and the strains put on Soviet industry by the German invasion. Because of its massive weight, the tank was equipped with wading devices permitting it to traverse rivers up to 9 feet deep. The team also designed a removable observation tower that could be used to direct the fire of the howitzers and rockets while the tank was in a turret down position.
KV-VI Specifications
Crew: 15 men and one Commissar Length: 51 feet, 4 inches
Height: 15 feet, 3 inches Width: 10 feet, 10 inches
Height/tower raised: 37 feet, 8 inches Weight: 138 tons
Engine: 3 X V-2 at 600 horsepower each Max Speed: 13 mph
Max Range: 98 miles road; 43 miles cross country
Armor: 160mm maximum; 7mm minimum
Armament: 2 X 152mm; 2 X 76.2mm; 1 X 45mm; 2 X 12.7mm DShK; 2 X 7.62mm Maxim; 14 X 7.62mm DT; 16 X BM-13 Rockets; 2 X Model 1933 Flamethrowers
Operational History
The first prototype was completed in December 1941 and was rushed into the defense of Moscow. In its first action during a dense winter fog, the rear turret accidentally fired into the center turret. The resulting explosion completely destroyed the vehicle. The second prototype was completed in January 1942, and was sent to the Leningrad front. This one had indicators installed to show whe another turret was in the line of fire. In its initial attack on the Germans, the tank broke in half when crossing a ravine. A spark ignited the leaking flamethrower fuel and the resulting explosion completely destroyed the vehicle. The third prototype, shown here, had a reinforced hull and was also sent to the Leningrad front in early 1942. It did manage to shoot down three German aircraft. In its first ground engagement, the KV-VI was firing on German positions when coincidentally all of the guns fired from the 3 O'Clock position a the same time. The tremendous recoil tipped the tank into a ditch and the severe jostling set off the 152mm ammunition, which completely destroyed the vehicle. After these failures, Stalin cancelled the project, and many of the design team members spent the rest of their lives in the Gulags of Sibera. The KV-VI was nicknamed "Stalin's Orchestra" by the few Germans that encountered it because of the variety of weapons it deployed.
Stockholm IPMS - whole thread
The true story about the KV-VI
Since the collapse of the Soviet Union, new facts have surfaced about the secret weapons developed by the Red Army during WWII. One of the most fascinating of these was the KV-VI Behemoth. In July 1941, Stalin learned of a single KV-II that had held off the entire 6th Panzer Division for more than a day. With the incredible success of this single tank, Stalin ordered a crash program for a land battleship based on the KV-II design. It was to have three turrets and be very heavily armed and armored and able to defend itself against all types of attack. The project was given to the joint team of Kotin/Barkov. When the designers complained to Stalin that the insistence on three turrets made the vehicle too long to have an acceptable turning radius, Stalin's answer was: "It doesn't need to turn, it will drive straight to Berlin." The final design became known as the KV-VI "Behemoth". The KV-VI was a multi-turreted tank using components of the KV-I and II, Bt-5, T-60, and T-38. The use of existing tank designs was necessary because of pressure from Stalin and the strains put on Soviet industry by the German invasion. Because of its massive weight, the tank was equipped with wading devices permitting it to traverse rivers up to 9 feet deep. The team also designed a removable observation tower that could be used to direct the fire of the howitzers and rockets while the tank was in a turret down position.
KV-VI Specifications
Crew: 15 men and one Commissar Length: 51 feet, 4 inches
Height: 15 feet, 3 inches Width: 10 feet, 10 inches
Height/tower raised: 37 feet, 8 inches Weight: 138 tons
Engine: 3 X V-2 at 600 horsepower each Max Speed: 13 mph
Max Range: 98 miles road; 43 miles cross country
Armor: 160mm maximum; 7mm minimum
Armament: 2 X 152mm; 2 X 76.2mm; 1 X 45mm; 2 X 12.7mm DShK; 2 X 7.62mm Maxim; 14 X 7.62mm DT; 16 X BM-13 Rockets; 2 X Model 1933 Flamethrowers
Operational History
The first prototype was completed in December 1941 and was rushed into the defense of Moscow. In its first action during a dense winter fog, the rear turret accidentally fired into the center turret. The resulting explosion completely destroyed the vehicle. The second prototype was completed in January 1942, and was sent to the Leningrad front. This one had indicators installed to show whe another turret was in the line of fire. In its initial attack on the Germans, the tank broke in half when crossing a ravine. A spark ignited the leaking flamethrower fuel and the resulting explosion completely destroyed the vehicle. The third prototype, shown here, had a reinforced hull and was also sent to the Leningrad front in early 1942. It did manage to shoot down three German aircraft. In its first ground engagement, the KV-VI was firing on German positions when coincidentally all of the guns fired from the 3 O'Clock position a the same time. The tremendous recoil tipped the tank into a ditch and the severe jostling set off the 152mm ammunition, which completely destroyed the vehicle. After these failures, Stalin cancelled the project, and many of the design team members spent the rest of their lives in the Gulags of Sibera. The KV-VI was nicknamed "Stalin's Orchestra" by the few Germans that encountered it because of the variety of weapons it deployed.
Stockholm IPMS - whole thread
airwarrior
New Jersey, United States
Joined: November 21, 2002
KitMaker: 2,085 posts
Armorama: 1,227 posts
Joined: November 21, 2002
KitMaker: 2,085 posts
Armorama: 1,227 posts
Posted: Friday, May 02, 2003 - 12:59 PM UTC
just what we need dave, another really ugly land battleship!! looks good,love the weathering
SS-74
Vatican City
Joined: May 13, 2002
KitMaker: 3,271 posts
Armorama: 2,388 posts
Joined: May 13, 2002
KitMaker: 3,271 posts
Armorama: 2,388 posts
Posted: Sunday, May 04, 2003 - 05:21 AM UTC
Thanks you guys for your kind comment. You guys should wait to see Sushi and Adam's T35, they do some serious nice stuff. Thanks again!!!