James McFarlane shows the steps he took when constructing Italeri''s SEMOVENTE DA 75/18
Link to Item
If you have comments or questions please post them here.
Thanks!
Armor/AFV
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
Hosted by Darren Baker, Mario Matijasic
FEATURE
SEMOVENTE DA 75/18Posted: Tuesday, October 21, 2008 - 07:36 AM UTC
seb43
Paris, France
Joined: August 30, 2005
KitMaker: 2,315 posts
Armorama: 2,158 posts
Joined: August 30, 2005
KitMaker: 2,315 posts
Armorama: 2,158 posts
Posted: Tuesday, October 21, 2008 - 10:17 AM UTC
What's a pity that the rubber tracks are so bad we can even see the join on the right one.
Cheers
seb
Cheers
seb
Drader
Wales, United Kingdom
Joined: July 20, 2004
KitMaker: 3,791 posts
Armorama: 2,798 posts
Joined: July 20, 2004
KitMaker: 3,791 posts
Armorama: 2,798 posts
Posted: Tuesday, October 21, 2008 - 09:05 PM UTC
Hi James
Are these the reference photos you used?
http://www.ambbrescia.com/photofile/Veicoli_terrestri_uniformi/_1/m75_18sum41/m41_75_18.html
I've built the Tamiya equivalent as well as Italeri's and the Tamiya interior is marginally more accurate as far as layout goes, but not as detailed. The Breda Modello 30 Italeri give you for the interior puzzled me too and I wondered if Italeri had managed to include it after looking at an M13/40 based Semovente as they used the Modello 30 as an AA MG instead of the Breda Modello 38 of the M41s. Just a guess though.
David
Are these the reference photos you used?
http://www.ambbrescia.com/photofile/Veicoli_terrestri_uniformi/_1/m75_18sum41/m41_75_18.html
I've built the Tamiya equivalent as well as Italeri's and the Tamiya interior is marginally more accurate as far as layout goes, but not as detailed. The Breda Modello 30 Italeri give you for the interior puzzled me too and I wondered if Italeri had managed to include it after looking at an M13/40 based Semovente as they used the Modello 30 as an AA MG instead of the Breda Modello 38 of the M41s. Just a guess though.
David
Posted: Tuesday, October 21, 2008 - 11:55 PM UTC
Nice job on that one, James. Good to see what nice builds can be achieved with old kits.
Thanks for sharing
Thanks for sharing
Jamesite
United Kingdom
Joined: December 05, 2006
KitMaker: 2,208 posts
Armorama: 2,152 posts
Joined: December 05, 2006
KitMaker: 2,208 posts
Armorama: 2,152 posts
Posted: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 - 01:35 AM UTC
Hi Guys, glad you enjoyed the article.
-Darren; thanks for putting up with my many e-mails and getting this up on the site, appreciated!
-Seb; the tracks themselves actually have quite good detail for their age, although of course suffer from the issues that rubber band tracks have. For this build I couldn't justify spending twice the price of the kit on indy links. The join you see was due to some over zealous heated screwdriver work that prevented this side from closing properly. Obviously hiding it under the roadwheels didn't prevent your eagle eye from spotting it!
-David; Yes that site was the inspiration for some of the interior scratching and the interior colour scheme, the other big online reference used was the beutepanzer site which has several pics of Semovente's in German service.
I havn't built the Tamiya kit (which looks like will be re-released with new figs soon) but I know it includes the ammo storage bin that is missing in this kit.
Can't comment on the Italian MG's with any certainty but what you say sounds plausible. It's unlikely they would have had both, my feeling is that it was added simply as something else to put in the interior.
-Jesper; Thanks for your kind words. I'm a big advocate of not writing off old kits, with some TLC they can make some lovely builds.
Thanks guys, I welcome any more questions.
James
-Darren; thanks for putting up with my many e-mails and getting this up on the site, appreciated!
-Seb; the tracks themselves actually have quite good detail for their age, although of course suffer from the issues that rubber band tracks have. For this build I couldn't justify spending twice the price of the kit on indy links. The join you see was due to some over zealous heated screwdriver work that prevented this side from closing properly. Obviously hiding it under the roadwheels didn't prevent your eagle eye from spotting it!
-David; Yes that site was the inspiration for some of the interior scratching and the interior colour scheme, the other big online reference used was the beutepanzer site which has several pics of Semovente's in German service.
I havn't built the Tamiya kit (which looks like will be re-released with new figs soon) but I know it includes the ammo storage bin that is missing in this kit.
Can't comment on the Italian MG's with any certainty but what you say sounds plausible. It's unlikely they would have had both, my feeling is that it was added simply as something else to put in the interior.
-Jesper; Thanks for your kind words. I'm a big advocate of not writing off old kits, with some TLC they can make some lovely builds.
Thanks guys, I welcome any more questions.
James
seb43
Paris, France
Joined: August 30, 2005
KitMaker: 2,315 posts
Armorama: 2,158 posts
Joined: August 30, 2005
KitMaker: 2,315 posts
Armorama: 2,158 posts
Posted: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 - 04:39 AM UTC
Thanks James for your reply
Nice build anyway
seb
Nice build anyway
seb
Grumpyoldman
Consigliere
Florida, United States
Joined: October 17, 2003
KitMaker: 15,338 posts
Armorama: 7,297 posts
Joined: October 17, 2003
KitMaker: 15,338 posts
Armorama: 7,297 posts
Posted: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 - 05:42 AM UTC
It's always nice to see these older kits being built and still enjoyed.
Nothing wrong with exercising a little modeling skills to update older kits instead of simply writing them off.
Having built both the Tamyia and Italeri kits back in the land of real teeth, I always liked the finer details on the Italeri kit, over the Tamyia kit's more chunkier parts. But just my opinion of the two kits.
Nothing wrong with exercising a little modeling skills to update older kits instead of simply writing them off.
Having built both the Tamyia and Italeri kits back in the land of real teeth, I always liked the finer details on the Italeri kit, over the Tamyia kit's more chunkier parts. But just my opinion of the two kits.
Jamesite
United Kingdom
Joined: December 05, 2006
KitMaker: 2,208 posts
Armorama: 2,152 posts
Joined: December 05, 2006
KitMaker: 2,208 posts
Armorama: 2,152 posts
Posted: Friday, October 24, 2008 - 01:35 AM UTC
Dave,
Thanks for the comments. As mentioned I havn't built the Tamiya kit, but having seen it built and under construction i'd be inclined to agree with your assesment. I'd definately recommend the Italeri/Zvezda offering anyway.
James
Thanks for the comments. As mentioned I havn't built the Tamiya kit, but having seen it built and under construction i'd be inclined to agree with your assesment. I'd definately recommend the Italeri/Zvezda offering anyway.
James