I started work on the Trumpeter KV-II and have a question regarding the barrel.
Is it supposed to have the two grooves that are molded into the tube?
I would like to replace it with a metal barrel but I am uncertain as to which one to purchase.
Any recommendations as to which aftermarket barrel is the most accurate?
Thanks.
Matt
Яusso-Soviэt Forum
Russian or Soviet vehicles/armor modeling forum.
Russian or Soviet vehicles/armor modeling forum.
Hosted by Darren Baker, Jacques Duquette
Trumpeter KV-II Barrel
Fledermaus
New York, United States
Joined: January 05, 2007
KitMaker: 236 posts
Armorama: 174 posts
Joined: January 05, 2007
KitMaker: 236 posts
Armorama: 174 posts
Posted: Friday, November 21, 2008 - 03:50 AM UTC
Minsk94
Wisconsin, United States
Joined: June 16, 2008
KitMaker: 418 posts
Armorama: 408 posts
Joined: June 16, 2008
KitMaker: 418 posts
Armorama: 408 posts
Posted: Friday, November 28, 2008 - 05:43 AM UTC
It depends on which version of KV-2 you are building. Or actually, how picky do you want to be. The gun of KV-2 mod.1940 had two grooves. The mod. of 1941 had one groove or none at all. But tanks of 1940 were later upgraded with newer gun, so you can see newer gun on early tanks.
So what I am trying to say with all that "blah-blah", if you are building KV-2 with the version of a turret of 1941 don't put two-grooves barrel. For mod. 1940 - anything goes.
So what I am trying to say with all that "blah-blah", if you are building KV-2 with the version of a turret of 1941 don't put two-grooves barrel. For mod. 1940 - anything goes.
MCR
Arizona, United States
Joined: July 15, 2004
KitMaker: 464 posts
Armorama: 407 posts
Joined: July 15, 2004
KitMaker: 464 posts
Armorama: 407 posts
Posted: Friday, November 28, 2008 - 07:09 AM UTC
No.
The barrels did have jackets made of two or three parts however these sections butted together tightly and the joints are nearly impossible to see.
In fact the only photo I know of where the seams are obvious is of a gun that has been hit by an AT round causing a section of the jacket to crack.
If anything the joints should be represented as the thinnest, shallowest lines possible and not the deep grooves the kit has.
Mark
The barrels did have jackets made of two or three parts however these sections butted together tightly and the joints are nearly impossible to see.
In fact the only photo I know of where the seams are obvious is of a gun that has been hit by an AT round causing a section of the jacket to crack.
If anything the joints should be represented as the thinnest, shallowest lines possible and not the deep grooves the kit has.
Mark
Fledermaus
New York, United States
Joined: January 05, 2007
KitMaker: 236 posts
Armorama: 174 posts
Joined: January 05, 2007
KitMaker: 236 posts
Armorama: 174 posts
Posted: Monday, December 01, 2008 - 01:38 AM UTC
Alex & Mark,
Thank you for your replies.
Thank you for your replies.
Drader
Wales, United Kingdom
Joined: July 20, 2004
KitMaker: 3,791 posts
Armorama: 2,798 posts
Joined: July 20, 2004
KitMaker: 3,791 posts
Armorama: 2,798 posts
Posted: Monday, December 01, 2008 - 01:45 AM UTC
KV-2s from the first production run didn't have a reinforcing ring on the muzzle either
David
David