_GOTOBOTTOM
Armor/AFV: Canadian Armor
Discuss all types of Canadian Armor of all eras.
Hosted by Darren Baker
Vc or Ic?
M4A2Sherman
Visit this Community
Canada
Joined: December 29, 2008
KitMaker: 316 posts
Armorama: 264 posts
Posted: Thursday, September 03, 2009 - 06:00 AM UTC
Which did the Canadians use for Fireflys? VC or IC?
AlanL
Visit this Community
England - East Anglia, United Kingdom
Joined: August 12, 2005
KitMaker: 14,499 posts
Armorama: 11,675 posts
Posted: Thursday, September 03, 2009 - 06:16 AM UTC
Hi,

They used both the VC and IC Hybrid plus the M4 Sherman Firefly. Shermans were the Mk III and Mk V and some 105mm Sherman Mk IBs, plus RAM Mk IIs. Recce Tanks were M3A3, Stuart Mk V and M5A1, Stuart Mk VI., plus Cruiser A15, Mk VI Crusader Mk III for Anti Aircraft defence.

Al
M4A2Sherman
Visit this Community
Canada
Joined: December 29, 2008
KitMaker: 316 posts
Armorama: 264 posts
Posted: Thursday, September 03, 2009 - 06:37 AM UTC
Thanks alot!!!!
Thatguy
Visit this Community
Virginia, United States
Joined: November 09, 2008
KitMaker: 487 posts
Armorama: 451 posts
Posted: Thursday, September 03, 2009 - 06:52 AM UTC

Quoted Text

They used both the VC and IC plus the M4 Sherman Firefly.


I don't know enough about the early and late variations, but shouldn't the Sherman IC = M4 Sherman Firefly? The Sherman I was the British nomenclature for standard M4s right?
AlanL
Visit this Community
England - East Anglia, United Kingdom
Joined: August 12, 2005
KitMaker: 14,499 posts
Armorama: 11,675 posts
Posted: Thursday, September 03, 2009 - 07:07 AM UTC
Hi Joe,

I assumed he was refering to the M4 Ic Hybrid the more readily available kit, hence mentioning the M4 Firefly as well. I believe the Canadians had both along wiht the VC.

So just to clarify

M4 Sherman Ic - M4 Medium Tank with 17pdr
M4 Sherman Ic hybrid (or composite if you prefer) - M4 Medium Tank with composite hull: cast front and welded rear end and 17pdr gun
M4A4 Sherman Vc Firefly - M4A4 Medium Tank modified with 17-pdr gun (Firefly)

Kits are available for both the M4A4 Sherman VC Firefly and M4 Sherman Ic Hybrid. If you want an M4 Ic you will need to do a kit bash of a standard M4 hull with the 17pdr turret.

Al
Thatguy
Visit this Community
Virginia, United States
Joined: November 09, 2008
KitMaker: 487 posts
Armorama: 451 posts
Posted: Thursday, September 03, 2009 - 08:17 AM UTC

Quoted Text

Hi Joe,

I assumed he was refering to the M4 Ic Hybrid the more readily available kit, hence mentioning the M4 Firefly as well. I believe the Canadians had both along wiht the VC.

So just to clarify

M4 Sherman Ic - M4 Medium Tank with 17pdr
M4 Sherman Ic hybrid (or composite if you prefer) - M4 Medium Tank with composite hull: cast front and welded rear end and 17pdr gun
M4A4 Sherman Vc Firefly - M4A4 Medium Tank modified with 17-pdr gun (Firefly)

Kits are available for both the M4A4 Sherman VC Firefly and M4 Sherman Ic Hybrid. If you want an M4 Ic you will need to do a kit bash of a standard M4 hull with the 17pdr turret.

Al


I was just looking to check. I keep a list on my computer of common US/British and British nomenclature during the Second World War, and wanted to know if there was something that needed to be added.
chefchris
Visit this Community
North Carolina, United States
Joined: February 06, 2006
KitMaker: 1,544 posts
Armorama: 1,464 posts
Posted: Thursday, September 03, 2009 - 08:26 AM UTC
They did indeed use all Firefly marks. Initially the Vc was the most common, but by the war's end the M4 based Firefly was the most popular - there were even some with the oval loaders hatch and commanders all around vision cuploas.
AlanL
Visit this Community
England - East Anglia, United Kingdom
Joined: August 12, 2005
KitMaker: 14,499 posts
Armorama: 11,675 posts
Posted: Thursday, September 03, 2009 - 08:30 AM UTC
Hi Joe,

Yes, it gets confusing with the British stuff. Also wasn't sure if it was MTO or NWE Q was after.

Good point to clarify it.

Al
jjumbo
Visit this Community
British Columbia, Canada
Joined: August 27, 2006
KitMaker: 2,012 posts
Armorama: 1,949 posts
Posted: Thursday, September 03, 2009 - 11:15 AM UTC
Hi guys,
IIRC, Canadian Armoured Regiments drew their equipment from British depots and the primary tank was the Sherman V (M4A4).
Some CAR's in the MTO received older used vehicles that were from the British 8th Army including the Sherman I (M4), Sherman II (M4A1) and Sherman III (M4A2).
Those vehicles were replaced by Sherman V's as they wore out.
Most CAR's in Engand, prior to D-Day, had been reequipped with Sherman V's.
Some units like the Sherbrooke Fusiliers were reequipped with Sherman III's, others had Sherman I's and II's.
A good little booklet to pick up on the subject is The Sherman in Canadian Service
It details what types of Shermans some CAR's received in the ETO and MTO.
Cheers

jjumbo
Totalize
Visit this Community
Ontario, Canada
Joined: February 04, 2009
KitMaker: 743 posts
Armorama: 549 posts
Posted: Thursday, September 03, 2009 - 11:59 AM UTC
Here's a Canadian Firefly IC. This is the M4 welded version. Like Al said if you want to do this one you have to do a kit bash of an M4 with the proper firefly turret and 17 pounder.

Note the cast transmission cover that distinguished the IC an IC hybrid versions from the VC's which had the 3 piece transmission cover. Interestingly, also note the tracks. This particular tank is outfitted with the T54E1 steel chevron tracks but carries the T62 type as spares on the transmission cover.

GeraldOwens
Visit this Community
Florida, United States
Joined: March 30, 2006
KitMaker: 3,736 posts
Armorama: 3,697 posts
Posted: Saturday, September 05, 2009 - 01:58 AM UTC

Quoted Text

Here's a Canadian Firefly IC. This is the M4 welded version. Like Al said if you want to do this one you have to do a kit bash of an M4 with the proper firefly turret and 17 pounder.

Note the cast transmission cover that distinguished the IC an IC hybrid versions from the VC's which had the 3 piece transmission cover. Interestingly, also note the tracks. This particular tank is outfitted with the T54E1 steel chevron tracks but carries the T62 type as spares on the transmission cover.



This particular one is apparently a Baldwin built M4, which will require a tad more work to duplicate using existing kits. Unlike other M4 tanks, the Baldwin products had a vertical upper tail plate (on other M4's, they were slanted at about ten degrees), and this plant never switched from the direct vision ports to the larger hoods with periscopes when the other factories did. Look closely and you'll see the driver's hoods are small and round, and the applique armor isn't spaced as far away from the glacis. These tanks did get the later cast transmission housings, though, as well as the later suspension types, which explains the tank's apparent mix of early and late features.
That said, other Sherman IC tanks were based on more common M4 hulls, so the Dragon M4 "Normandy Sherman" would be a sensible starting point. The Tamiya M4 is not as useful, as the cast parts on the glacis are more suitable for an M4A3 or M4A4.
M4A2Sherman
Visit this Community
Canada
Joined: December 29, 2008
KitMaker: 316 posts
Armorama: 264 posts
Posted: Monday, September 07, 2009 - 10:36 AM UTC
Wow, that's a lot of info! Thanks to everyone!

M4A2Sherman
NebLWeffah
Visit this Community
Alberta, Canada
Joined: October 13, 2004
KitMaker: 1,683 posts
Armorama: 1,248 posts
Posted: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 - 04:12 PM UTC
Hi folks
I just love watching how discussions about Shermans and variants unfold into becoming a veritible gold mine of information. You guys are the best!! I'm a complete Sherman noob and I've only just begun my first foray into 'Sherman-town' by starting on Tasca's Vc Firefly (kit 35-009).

So far it's a great kit and going together really well and I'm having lots of fun. I want to build a Canadian Vc on or shortly after D-Day but I'm finding a hard time getting info about markings and finding reference pics online. I have a fair amount collected so far on British tanks but comparitively fewer on Canadian ones. I have in my mind that I'd like to build a Sherbrooke Fusiliers tank, a Strathcona's tank or a 1st Hussars tank. Maybe the Hussars tank that took out 5 or 6 panthers a few days afere D-day, I don't know. I'd appreciate some ideas and hints before I get far into the build. I have a reference book on the way, the Vanguard book on the Sherman Firefly, but I don't want to run out and buy more books if I can help it. I also have the Panda Plastics T54E1 tracks and a set of duckbills as the few pictures of Canadian tanks I've seen seem to have these tracks fitted. I also have the Aber basic set and the fender set for this kit as I see that Canadian Vc's seem to have had the front and rear sand shield fitted but with usually the middle one missing. Also, the Aber set has lots of fittings for the 'boathouse' deception add-on but I don't think Canadian tanks ever used this set up, correct?

Any help, guidance and reference pics would be appreciated. Please educate me...

Thanks very much fellow modellers and reference hogs!!

cheers

Bob
jjumbo
Visit this Community
British Columbia, Canada
Joined: August 27, 2006
KitMaker: 2,012 posts
Armorama: 1,949 posts
Posted: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 - 06:53 PM UTC
Hey Bob,
If you're looking for markings, Ultracast makes a set of water slide decals for Shermans and Fireflys with the Lord Strathcona's Horse
Unfortunately, their set for the Sherbrooke Fusiliers and the set for the 1st Hussars are OOP.
I believe the blue/green 51 AoS marking for the LSH is inaccurate, the red 51 is the correct one according to this site: Lord Strathcona's Horse markings
And I have a spare set of 1st Hussars and Sherbrooke Fusiliers decals if you're interested.
Cheers

jjumbo
rolf
Visit this Community
Washington, United States
Joined: August 17, 2004
KitMaker: 301 posts
Armorama: 250 posts
Posted: Thursday, October 01, 2009 - 04:31 AM UTC
Now if some one could find and post some good clear pics of 28th BCR Sherman Vs during Totalize (before going up the hill, or of the survivors), I for one would be very happy. Still hoping.

Roy
NebLWeffah
Visit this Community
Alberta, Canada
Joined: October 13, 2004
KitMaker: 1,683 posts
Armorama: 1,248 posts
Posted: Thursday, October 01, 2009 - 07:08 AM UTC
Hi John

I'd be very interested in acquiring your spare decals for the Hussars and Fusiliers. I've pm's you.

many thanks

Bob
jjumbo
Visit this Community
British Columbia, Canada
Joined: August 27, 2006
KitMaker: 2,012 posts
Armorama: 1,949 posts
Posted: Thursday, October 01, 2009 - 07:26 AM UTC

Quoted Text

Hi John

I'd be very interested in acquiring your spare decals for the Hussars and Fusiliers. I've pm's you.

many thanks

Bob



Hey Bob,
Your PM was received and one sent to you.
Cheers

jjumbo
jjumbo
Visit this Community
British Columbia, Canada
Joined: August 27, 2006
KitMaker: 2,012 posts
Armorama: 1,949 posts
Posted: Thursday, October 01, 2009 - 07:50 AM UTC

Quoted Text

Now if some one could find and post some good clear pics of 28th BCR Sherman Vs during Totalize (before going up the hill, or of the survivors), I for one would be very happy. Still hoping.

Roy



Hey Roy,
The British Columbia Regiment is located here in Vancouver.
They have a large collection of photos in their upstairs museum, a friend of mine was their unofficial curator about 20 years ago.
You might want to contact them directly British Columbia Regiment
Here's a picture of the Ram Mk. II gate guard outside the Beatty Street Armoury:



There's a M4A2 HVSS Sherman there too but I can't a photo.
Cheers

jjumbo
Totalize
Visit this Community
Ontario, Canada
Joined: February 04, 2009
KitMaker: 743 posts
Armorama: 549 posts
Posted: Thursday, October 01, 2009 - 08:12 AM UTC

Quoted Text


Quoted Text

Here's a Canadian Firefly IC. This is the M4 welded version. Like Al said if you want to do this one you have to do a kit bash of an M4 with the proper firefly turret and 17 pounder.

Note the cast transmission cover that distinguished the IC an IC hybrid versions from the VC's which had the 3 piece transmission cover. Interestingly, also note the tracks. This particular tank is outfitted with the T54E1 steel chevron tracks but carries the T62 type as spares on the transmission cover.



This particular one is apparently a Baldwin built M4, which will require a tad more work to duplicate using existing kits. Unlike other M4 tanks, the Baldwin products had a vertical upper tail plate (on other M4's, they were slanted at about ten degrees), and this plant never switched from the direct vision ports to the larger hoods with periscopes when the other factories did. Look closely and you'll see the driver's hoods are small and round, and the applique armor isn't spaced as far away from the glacis. These tanks did get the later cast transmission housings, though, as well as the later suspension types, which explains the tank's apparent mix of early and late features.
That said, other Sherman IC tanks were based on more common M4 hulls, so the Dragon M4 "Normandy Sherman" would be a sensible starting point. The Tamiya M4 is not as useful, as the cast parts on the glacis are more suitable for an M4A3 or M4A4.



Gerald, interesting observation. Looking at the driver's hood area on the right hand side near the armour plate I can see what looks like the edge of one of the direct vision ports.
The driver's hoods indeed look like those of a DV hull.
In this case Formations makes a M4 DV hull conversion if one wanted to perhaps model this tank. It's pretty pricey though at $30.

https://secure.websitepros.com/formationsmodels.com/281340.html
 _GOTOTOP