MiniArt have just sent us details of their NEXT armor Release in 1/35th scale: 35092 - VALENTINE Mk.IV RED ARMY with CREW. The Image Report can be seen:
Link to Item
If you have comments or questions please post them here.
Thanks!
Armor/AFV
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
Hosted by Darren Baker, Mario Matijasic
NEWS
Red Valentine from MiniArt - Imagesjimbrae
Provincia de Lugo, Spain / España
Joined: April 23, 2003
KitMaker: 12,927 posts
Armorama: 9,486 posts
Joined: April 23, 2003
KitMaker: 12,927 posts
Armorama: 9,486 posts
Posted: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 - 03:27 AM UTC
Orangebarrelman
United States
Joined: October 31, 2009
KitMaker: 71 posts
Armorama: 56 posts
Joined: October 31, 2009
KitMaker: 71 posts
Armorama: 56 posts
Posted: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 - 05:09 AM UTC
Pity it only has individual link tracks as not all of us who like to build armor have the patience to do them.
Still interesting that they did a Red Army variant before a British Army one.
One question, is the anti aircraft machine gun a Vickers K or a Russian gun? I'm not enough of a expert to know which type of gun that is.
Still interesting that they did a Red Army variant before a British Army one.
One question, is the anti aircraft machine gun a Vickers K or a Russian gun? I'm not enough of a expert to know which type of gun that is.
bocurev
England - East Anglia, United Kingdom
Joined: March 23, 2010
KitMaker: 12 posts
Armorama: 9 posts
Joined: March 23, 2010
KitMaker: 12 posts
Armorama: 9 posts
Posted: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 - 05:57 AM UTC
I believe thats a Mk 2 Bren gun with the rarer 100 round drum magazine.
bill_c
Campaigns Administrator
New Jersey, United States
Joined: January 09, 2008
KitMaker: 10,553 posts
Armorama: 8,109 posts
Joined: January 09, 2008
KitMaker: 10,553 posts
Armorama: 8,109 posts
Posted: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 - 08:14 AM UTC
Individual links, thank God!
alanmac
United Kingdom
Joined: February 25, 2007
KitMaker: 3,033 posts
Armorama: 2,953 posts
Joined: February 25, 2007
KitMaker: 3,033 posts
Armorama: 2,953 posts
Posted: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 - 08:38 AM UTC
Hi
I don't have much knowledge of this tank but from the pictures shown it looks a great effort on Miniart's part and a lot of nice detail.
I note the way the upper hull has been created and wonder if this leaves the way open to create other vehicles on this chassis. Isn't there a self propelled gun that uses this chassis?
Great stuff.
Alan
I don't have much knowledge of this tank but from the pictures shown it looks a great effort on Miniart's part and a lot of nice detail.
I note the way the upper hull has been created and wonder if this leaves the way open to create other vehicles on this chassis. Isn't there a self propelled gun that uses this chassis?
Great stuff.
Alan
Halaci
Budapest, Hungary
Joined: October 05, 2005
KitMaker: 223 posts
Armorama: 215 posts
Joined: October 05, 2005
KitMaker: 223 posts
Armorama: 215 posts
Posted: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 - 09:11 AM UTC
Yes, there were two of them, the Bishop with a 25pdr field gun and the Archer with the 17pdr AT gun. As the 17pdr has just been announced by Bronco and previously there were connection between the companies, we can hope that at least the Archer will hit the shelves soon.
Jmarles
British Columbia, Canada
Joined: November 02, 2008
KitMaker: 1,138 posts
Armorama: 953 posts
Joined: November 02, 2008
KitMaker: 1,138 posts
Armorama: 953 posts
Posted: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 - 09:22 AM UTC
Cool, MiniArt does it again - a fresh and interesting release. Looks pretty nice. No markings though? Was this normal or maybe Archer or someone will come up with some decals.
oh, if only I could afford some new kits.
oh, if only I could afford some new kits.
dr_mazgan
Jerusalem, Israel
Joined: November 26, 2009
KitMaker: 48 posts
Armorama: 44 posts
Joined: November 26, 2009
KitMaker: 48 posts
Armorama: 44 posts
Posted: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 - 09:27 AM UTC
what is so red army about it? what stops it being a british tank with different decals?
D_J_W
Hamilton, New Zealand
Joined: December 30, 2005
KitMaker: 436 posts
Armorama: 367 posts
Joined: December 30, 2005
KitMaker: 436 posts
Armorama: 367 posts
Posted: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 - 10:27 AM UTC
Oh my poor bank account.
It's nice to see optional stowage bins and some interior detail.
cheers
David
It's nice to see optional stowage bins and some interior detail.
cheers
David
jimbrae
Provincia de Lugo, Spain / España
Joined: April 23, 2003
KitMaker: 12,927 posts
Armorama: 9,486 posts
Joined: April 23, 2003
KitMaker: 12,927 posts
Armorama: 9,486 posts
Posted: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 - 10:56 AM UTC
Quoted Text
what is so red army about it? what stops it being a british tank with different decals?
Perhaps something to do with the fact that quite a number were sent to the Soviet Union under Lend-Lease?
ericadeane
Michigan, United States
Joined: October 28, 2002
KitMaker: 4,021 posts
Armorama: 3,947 posts
Joined: October 28, 2002
KitMaker: 4,021 posts
Armorama: 3,947 posts
Posted: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 - 06:27 PM UTC
It's no surprise that it's being marketed as the Russian version first. It's a common strategy. Look at the long awaited Centurion. When released by AFV Club, they issued it as a RAAC version. Of course NATO, UK and IDF usage of the Centurion was far greater. But if they had released an IDF version first, how many Aussie Centurions would have been sold? By selling the Aussie version first, many people grabbed it just b/c it was a new tooled Centurion. Later they bought an IDF or NATO version -- but probably wouldn't have gotten the RAAC version after an IDF or NATO version.
Look @ the DML Panzer Mk IV ausf H --the most numerous version -- finally getting released. DML did the others first -- held this one back. Same rationale.
Look @ the DML Panzer Mk IV ausf H --the most numerous version -- finally getting released. DML did the others first -- held this one back. Same rationale.
jimbrae
Provincia de Lugo, Spain / España
Joined: April 23, 2003
KitMaker: 12,927 posts
Armorama: 9,486 posts
Joined: April 23, 2003
KitMaker: 12,927 posts
Armorama: 9,486 posts
Posted: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 - 08:37 PM UTC
Quoted Text
It's no surprise that it's being marketed as the Russian version first. It's a common strategy.
It certainly is from MiniArt! Being fortunate enough to know the MiniArt team personally, from the word go, they always understood the importance of maximizing their moulds. In that, that has been the reason for the delay in of their YC-12 tractor: they simply couldn't find as much documentation of the vehicle in German service (which allows them to sell more examples).
As a business model it's been imaginative strategy which is great for modelers - the more succesful they are, the more highly innovative releases we can expect!
PadrePete
Ontario, Canada
Joined: May 18, 2010
KitMaker: 219 posts
Armorama: 213 posts
Joined: May 18, 2010
KitMaker: 219 posts
Armorama: 213 posts
Posted: Wednesday, May 19, 2010 - 01:36 PM UTC
Nice to hear. Fell in love with their WLA, and Dingo. I'll wait for the Desert version, which I hope is the next one.
Posted: Wednesday, May 19, 2010 - 06:00 PM UTC
More excellent news, looks like a grand kit.
Al
Al
dr_mazgan
Jerusalem, Israel
Joined: November 26, 2009
KitMaker: 48 posts
Armorama: 44 posts
Joined: November 26, 2009
KitMaker: 48 posts
Armorama: 44 posts
Posted: Friday, May 21, 2010 - 05:39 AM UTC
Sarcasm lowest form of wit.
You could just answer my question, does it have russian specific changes to hull / armorment/ radio equipment is what i was suggesting.
Instead it seems you do not know.
You could just answer my question, does it have russian specific changes to hull / armorment/ radio equipment is what i was suggesting.
Instead it seems you do not know.
jimbrae
Provincia de Lugo, Spain / España
Joined: April 23, 2003
KitMaker: 12,927 posts
Armorama: 9,486 posts
Joined: April 23, 2003
KitMaker: 12,927 posts
Armorama: 9,486 posts
Posted: Friday, May 21, 2010 - 05:59 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Sarcasm lowest form of wit.
You could just answer my question, does it have russian specific changes to hull / armorment/ radio equipment is what i was suggesting.
Instead it seems you do not know.
No sarcasm. Asking a specific question usually gets a specific answer... You didn't, so I didn't either..
This post was removed.
Tarok
Victoria, Australia
Joined: July 28, 2004
KitMaker: 10,889 posts
Armorama: 3,245 posts
Joined: July 28, 2004
KitMaker: 10,889 posts
Armorama: 3,245 posts
Posted: Friday, May 21, 2010 - 09:53 AM UTC
Quoted Text
what is so red army about it? what stops it being a british tank with different decals?
Hi there,
I'm not sure why nobody understood your question, I sure did, and I have been wondering the same thing: was there any difference between the Red Army vehicle and the British issue apart from the markings?
I found the answer on Missing-Lynx: http://www.network54.com/Forum/47208/message/1274239617/Re-+can+you+build+it+as+a+British+and+Commonwealth+tank+too
HTH
R~