See here:
http://www.www-legend.co.kr/01_afv01.html
Яusso-Soviэt Forum
Russian or Soviet vehicles/armor modeling forum.
Russian or Soviet vehicles/armor modeling forum.
Hosted by Darren Baker, Jacques Duquette
New from Legends: Type-69 & T-55AM2B
afv_rob
England - East Anglia, United Kingdom
Joined: October 09, 2005
KitMaker: 2,556 posts
Armorama: 2,199 posts
Joined: October 09, 2005
KitMaker: 2,556 posts
Armorama: 2,199 posts
Posted: Saturday, February 26, 2011 - 10:26 PM UTC
retiredyank
Arkansas, United States
Joined: June 29, 2009
KitMaker: 11,610 posts
Armorama: 7,843 posts
Joined: June 29, 2009
KitMaker: 11,610 posts
Armorama: 7,843 posts
Posted: Saturday, February 26, 2011 - 11:52 PM UTC
Isn't Legends great.?
sauceman
Ontario, Canada
Joined: September 28, 2006
KitMaker: 2,672 posts
Armorama: 2,475 posts
Joined: September 28, 2006
KitMaker: 2,672 posts
Armorama: 2,475 posts
Posted: Sunday, February 27, 2011 - 05:21 AM UTC
Yes Legends products are really top drawer, nice to see these being made, now for a proper T-54 1949...
cheers
cheers
spetsnazgru
Lebanon
Joined: March 05, 2009
KitMaker: 661 posts
Armorama: 652 posts
Joined: March 05, 2009
KitMaker: 661 posts
Armorama: 652 posts
Posted: Sunday, February 27, 2011 - 09:48 AM UTC
ecuse my ignorance, which armies used the T-55AM2B?
Frenchy
Rhone, France
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Posted: Sunday, February 27, 2011 - 10:13 AM UTC
Quoted Text
ecuse my ignorance, which armies used the T-55AM2B?
East Germany NVA used it :
http://www.primeportal.net/tanks/ulrich_wrede/t-55am2b/
HTH
Frenchy
zapper
Skåne, Sweden
Joined: October 18, 2005
KitMaker: 745 posts
Armorama: 734 posts
Joined: October 18, 2005
KitMaker: 745 posts
Armorama: 734 posts
Posted: Sunday, February 27, 2011 - 10:21 AM UTC
Nice!!!
Hopefully the hatches on the AM2 engine deck can be built open as well.
Cheers,
/E
Hopefully the hatches on the AM2 engine deck can be built open as well.
Cheers,
/E
bison126
Correze, France
Joined: June 10, 2004
KitMaker: 5,329 posts
Armorama: 5,204 posts
Joined: June 10, 2004
KitMaker: 5,329 posts
Armorama: 5,204 posts
Posted: Sunday, February 27, 2011 - 06:58 PM UTC
Both conversions are looking good. We need to see them in flesh or at least have a review of them.
From the pictures, I think the AM2B has better details than the CMK and the Real Models conversions. I can't speak for the Panzershop one. The laser rangefinder housing, the side skirts are much better than those of the two previous sets. Erik, the engine deck looks nice but in my opinion, it is definitely closed or Legend would have shown at least one picture of it open.
Olivier
From the pictures, I think the AM2B has better details than the CMK and the Real Models conversions. I can't speak for the Panzershop one. The laser rangefinder housing, the side skirts are much better than those of the two previous sets. Erik, the engine deck looks nice but in my opinion, it is definitely closed or Legend would have shown at least one picture of it open.
Olivier
nooplwb
Hong Kong S.A.R. / 繁體
Joined: April 12, 2005
KitMaker: 202 posts
Armorama: 195 posts
Joined: April 12, 2005
KitMaker: 202 posts
Armorama: 195 posts
Posted: Sunday, February 27, 2011 - 07:17 PM UTC
Yeah,great.....only if they're willing to solve the shrinkage problem........
arpikaszabo
Praha, Czech Republic
Joined: February 13, 2006
KitMaker: 674 posts
Armorama: 637 posts
Joined: February 13, 2006
KitMaker: 674 posts
Armorama: 637 posts
Posted: Sunday, February 27, 2011 - 07:48 PM UTC
Having almost finished building the CMK conversion I can say that this is definitely superior. I saw this kind of rear side skirts on NVA AM2Bs.
bison126
Correze, France
Joined: June 10, 2004
KitMaker: 5,329 posts
Armorama: 5,204 posts
Joined: June 10, 2004
KitMaker: 5,329 posts
Armorama: 5,204 posts
Posted: Sunday, February 27, 2011 - 10:06 PM UTC
Hi Arpad,
I have the CMK myself and found that the laser rangefinder was a bit undersized which generates a gap between the Tamiya turret and the resin part. Another issue is the skirts that are too short.
Maybe those problems are due to some shrinkage on my model but I fear it is common to all kits. I remember having seen the same problem in the Osprey book "Modelling the T-55".
Did you encounter such problems ? If yes, how did you fix the skirts ?
I consider the CMK kit a good one and better than the RM one. The PE sheet is a great addition even though it looks a bit tricky to shape (for example the engine deck mutli-parts covers). Any building feedback on this conversion would be appreciated. I intend to build a Czech tank not a NVA one.
TIA
Olivier
I have the CMK myself and found that the laser rangefinder was a bit undersized which generates a gap between the Tamiya turret and the resin part. Another issue is the skirts that are too short.
Maybe those problems are due to some shrinkage on my model but I fear it is common to all kits. I remember having seen the same problem in the Osprey book "Modelling the T-55".
Did you encounter such problems ? If yes, how did you fix the skirts ?
I consider the CMK kit a good one and better than the RM one. The PE sheet is a great addition even though it looks a bit tricky to shape (for example the engine deck mutli-parts covers). Any building feedback on this conversion would be appreciated. I intend to build a Czech tank not a NVA one.
TIA
Olivier
marcb
Overijssel, Netherlands
Joined: March 25, 2006
KitMaker: 1,244 posts
Armorama: 1,226 posts
Joined: March 25, 2006
KitMaker: 1,244 posts
Armorama: 1,226 posts
Posted: Sunday, February 27, 2011 - 10:26 PM UTC
Great to see how Legend is jumping into this market.
I'm just suprised that they don't include the chinese style IR gunner's sight in both their Type 59 and Type 69.
See here for an example:
http://www.primeportal.net/tanks/djiti_power/t-69/index.php?Page=5
Ditto for the chinese Type 54 machine gun. This can be ID'd by the lack of ribs on the barrel:
http://www.primeportal.net/tanks/greg_smith/t-69_iraqi/
I'm just suprised that they don't include the chinese style IR gunner's sight in both their Type 59 and Type 69.
See here for an example:
http://www.primeportal.net/tanks/djiti_power/t-69/index.php?Page=5
Ditto for the chinese Type 54 machine gun. This can be ID'd by the lack of ribs on the barrel:
http://www.primeportal.net/tanks/greg_smith/t-69_iraqi/
arpikaszabo
Praha, Czech Republic
Joined: February 13, 2006
KitMaker: 674 posts
Armorama: 637 posts
Joined: February 13, 2006
KitMaker: 674 posts
Armorama: 637 posts
Posted: Sunday, February 27, 2011 - 10:36 PM UTC
Olivier,
The CMK kit can be built up to modern standards, it just needs some work and a lot of love. The sensor size is almost correct, I think the master maker just did not care to make a good canvas cover. I dont consider myself a good modeller but was able to make something much better in one hour. Unfortunately I dont have the model with me right now, so no photos, but I will try to explain.
First, find a good reference photo where You have a view of the rangefinder, the barrel and their position compared to each other. Like this http://svsm.org/gallery/T-55AM2/IMGP4909 and this http://svsm.org/gallery/T-55AM2/IMGP0188. Here You can find a small walkaround for the Czech Kladivo http://modelari-cheb.valka.cz/pages/rokycany_modern.htm
Then shave off the resin canvas part off the rangefindef part, leave the box sensor part only.
Now assemble the Tamiya canvas acording to instructions.
Then make a corresponding hole on the TOP of the plastic Tamiya canvas part. Dry fit the resin sensor part into the hole just to get an idea of the proportions.
Now mix some epoxy putty, I used Green stuff, stuff it into the hole You made on the Tamiya canvas part, push the resin sensor box into it.
Now You have two hours to get the proportions right, remove the excess putty and shappe the folds on the canvas cover.
Add the remaining rivet details and so on.
Sorry for writing like for a retard, I have no photos. I made up this correction myself, it will look close enough, I was satisfied with it. Still, Legend got it nicer.
Anyway, I made up a cheap method for fixing the Tamiya barrel as well, if intersted I will explain.
And, I will not put side skirts on it, I will use some workable AM track. Now Trumpeter is releasing t72 tracks, I am interested about it.
Happy modelling,
Arpad
The CMK kit can be built up to modern standards, it just needs some work and a lot of love. The sensor size is almost correct, I think the master maker just did not care to make a good canvas cover. I dont consider myself a good modeller but was able to make something much better in one hour. Unfortunately I dont have the model with me right now, so no photos, but I will try to explain.
First, find a good reference photo where You have a view of the rangefinder, the barrel and their position compared to each other. Like this http://svsm.org/gallery/T-55AM2/IMGP4909 and this http://svsm.org/gallery/T-55AM2/IMGP0188. Here You can find a small walkaround for the Czech Kladivo http://modelari-cheb.valka.cz/pages/rokycany_modern.htm
Then shave off the resin canvas part off the rangefindef part, leave the box sensor part only.
Now assemble the Tamiya canvas acording to instructions.
Then make a corresponding hole on the TOP of the plastic Tamiya canvas part. Dry fit the resin sensor part into the hole just to get an idea of the proportions.
Now mix some epoxy putty, I used Green stuff, stuff it into the hole You made on the Tamiya canvas part, push the resin sensor box into it.
Now You have two hours to get the proportions right, remove the excess putty and shappe the folds on the canvas cover.
Add the remaining rivet details and so on.
Sorry for writing like for a retard, I have no photos. I made up this correction myself, it will look close enough, I was satisfied with it. Still, Legend got it nicer.
Anyway, I made up a cheap method for fixing the Tamiya barrel as well, if intersted I will explain.
And, I will not put side skirts on it, I will use some workable AM track. Now Trumpeter is releasing t72 tracks, I am interested about it.
Happy modelling,
Arpad
bison126
Correze, France
Joined: June 10, 2004
KitMaker: 5,329 posts
Armorama: 5,204 posts
Joined: June 10, 2004
KitMaker: 5,329 posts
Armorama: 5,204 posts
Posted: Monday, February 28, 2011 - 08:29 AM UTC
Thanks for the answer Arpad. I understand how you fixed the issue with the rangefinder housing. That would be great if you posted some pictures of your build too.
Could you also check on your model that the skirts are the right length or too short like on my model ?
Olivier
Could you also check on your model that the skirts are the right length or too short like on my model ?
Olivier
arpikaszabo
Praha, Czech Republic
Joined: February 13, 2006
KitMaker: 674 posts
Armorama: 637 posts
Joined: February 13, 2006
KitMaker: 674 posts
Armorama: 637 posts
Posted: Monday, February 28, 2011 - 07:37 PM UTC
Olivier, I will send You some pics, but not before the easter holidays. Im busy with school and Im not going home for some time...
spiritwalker
England - North, United Kingdom
Joined: February 20, 2009
KitMaker: 99 posts
Armorama: 97 posts
Joined: February 20, 2009
KitMaker: 99 posts
Armorama: 97 posts
Posted: Monday, February 28, 2011 - 08:00 PM UTC
Hi Guys
We have, well i have always wanted a good conversion to build a Type 69. It seems with this release from Legends we now will have 2 to choose from. Not including the awful one from AEF a few years ago.
However it seems quite a few incorrect parts and details are included or emitted from the Legend Type 69 set....not sure what Legend deem a Type 59....it certainly isnt the the one they are passing off on their site..
A few things i have noticed that are incorrect on first glance...
Zip boxes
commanders gun sight
Mantlet
Main search lamp bracket location where it is attached to mantlet...and unit sat too high
Commanders cupola
Antenna tube depicted....this is for command tank
No generator or comms box on rear plate[ if depicting command tank]
AAMG wrong type
Not sure what the boxes are on the boom shields
Front lifting hooks on turret in wrong position
No glacis plate mg hole present
Good points
Boom shields around turret look pretty good
Engine deck from what i can see looks correct, although exhaust part is incorrect
I am sure this set will yeild other usable parts and although would be quite expensive to possibly utilize both this set and another one soon to be available from a Major aftermarket company...
Andy
We have, well i have always wanted a good conversion to build a Type 69. It seems with this release from Legends we now will have 2 to choose from. Not including the awful one from AEF a few years ago.
However it seems quite a few incorrect parts and details are included or emitted from the Legend Type 69 set....not sure what Legend deem a Type 59....it certainly isnt the the one they are passing off on their site..
A few things i have noticed that are incorrect on first glance...
Zip boxes
commanders gun sight
Mantlet
Main search lamp bracket location where it is attached to mantlet...and unit sat too high
Commanders cupola
Antenna tube depicted....this is for command tank
No generator or comms box on rear plate[ if depicting command tank]
AAMG wrong type
Not sure what the boxes are on the boom shields
Front lifting hooks on turret in wrong position
No glacis plate mg hole present
Good points
Boom shields around turret look pretty good
Engine deck from what i can see looks correct, although exhaust part is incorrect
I am sure this set will yeild other usable parts and although would be quite expensive to possibly utilize both this set and another one soon to be available from a Major aftermarket company...
Andy
afv_rob
England - East Anglia, United Kingdom
Joined: October 09, 2005
KitMaker: 2,556 posts
Armorama: 2,199 posts
Joined: October 09, 2005
KitMaker: 2,556 posts
Armorama: 2,199 posts
Posted: Monday, February 28, 2011 - 09:18 PM UTC
Quoted Text
I am sure this set will yeild other usable parts and although would be quite expensive to possibly utilize both this set and another one soon to be available from a Major aftermarket company...
Andy
I guess thats the Verlinden one you are referring to Andy? (your kit reworked by Charlie Pritchett) That to me looks to be the best so far, based on Charlies pics and of course the initial Airdale castings kit.
18Bravo
Colorado, United States
Joined: January 20, 2005
KitMaker: 7,219 posts
Armorama: 6,097 posts
Joined: January 20, 2005
KitMaker: 7,219 posts
Armorama: 6,097 posts
Posted: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 - 04:24 PM UTC
Perhaps I can post up some more photos soon, but here are the instruction sheets for now. I can answer a few questions though. Olivier, you are correct, the rear engine hatches do not open. As for the side skirts, there appears to be no shrinkage problem at all as they fit perfectly.
As I have not built the CMK version, I can't say much about it, other than I've found their other kits very pleasurable to build. The Legend kit does come with their fuel line plumbing parts, and yes, a few of the hoses diamaters are a little off. That's what modelling is about.
I can't wait to finish this particular conversion. I've always loved NVA armor, having spent about 10% of my life surrounded by it.
As I have not built the CMK version, I can't say much about it, other than I've found their other kits very pleasurable to build. The Legend kit does come with their fuel line plumbing parts, and yes, a few of the hoses diamaters are a little off. That's what modelling is about.
I can't wait to finish this particular conversion. I've always loved NVA armor, having spent about 10% of my life surrounded by it.
guni-kid
Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
Joined: July 21, 2007
KitMaker: 521 posts
Armorama: 514 posts
Joined: July 21, 2007
KitMaker: 521 posts
Armorama: 514 posts
Posted: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 - 07:42 PM UTC
Well, what I see in your pics looks much better than the CMK-kit (which is in its age by now). Not that the CMK-kit is bad (because it's not), but this one looks just way better!
Spiderfrommars
Milano, Italy
Joined: July 13, 2010
KitMaker: 3,845 posts
Armorama: 3,543 posts
Joined: July 13, 2010
KitMaker: 3,845 posts
Armorama: 3,543 posts
Posted: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 - 10:42 PM UTC
It looks simply amazing!
Derevyankin
St. Petersburg, Russia
Joined: February 07, 2009
KitMaker: 40 posts
Armorama: 37 posts
Joined: February 07, 2009
KitMaker: 40 posts
Armorama: 37 posts
Posted: Wednesday, April 06, 2011 - 06:51 PM UTC
Spiderfrommars
Milano, Italy
Joined: July 13, 2010
KitMaker: 3,845 posts
Armorama: 3,543 posts
Joined: July 13, 2010
KitMaker: 3,845 posts
Armorama: 3,543 posts
Posted: Wednesday, April 06, 2011 - 07:23 PM UTC
Thanks a milion Dmitry!
I LOVE that site!
vonHengest
Texas, United States
Joined: June 29, 2010
KitMaker: 5,854 posts
Armorama: 4,817 posts
Joined: June 29, 2010
KitMaker: 5,854 posts
Armorama: 4,817 posts
Posted: Thursday, April 07, 2011 - 04:38 PM UTC
I really dig Legend's conversions, but have never really had the chance to work with them. Based on all of the comments I've seen on this site, I'm guessing that I'm in for a treat?
rolf
Washington, United States
Joined: August 17, 2004
KitMaker: 301 posts
Armorama: 250 posts
Joined: August 17, 2004
KitMaker: 301 posts
Armorama: 250 posts
Posted: Thursday, April 07, 2011 - 05:45 PM UTC
I'm interested in the Enigma. I have seen that Verlinden is releaseing a Type 69-II conversion also and the rumor is it is the Airedale molds for most of the parts and added some P.E. If true this is the one I will be getting as those were mastered by Andy Taylor I believe. But it appears they too left out the Type 54 HMG. Oh well I'll still get it if the price is right.
Roy
Roy