_GOTOBOTTOM
Armor/AFV
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
NEWS
Dragon - First in the Family
SgtRam
Staff MemberContributing Writer
AEROSCALE
#197
Visit this Community
Ontario, Canada
Joined: March 06, 2011
KitMaker: 3,971 posts
Armorama: 2,859 posts
Posted: Friday, July 13, 2012 - 01:30 AM UTC
Dragon has announced the first variant in a popular Panzer family. They also have a new figure set.

Link to Item

If you have comments or questions please post them here.

Thanks!
simon2301
Visit this Community
United Kingdom
Joined: January 02, 2011
KitMaker: 23 posts
Armorama: 18 posts
Posted: Friday, July 13, 2012 - 02:45 AM UTC
Just wish they would crack on with some very early Pz.KpfW Mk IIIs. This though is a very welcome kit even if I only concentrate on British WW2 subjects. I do have a soft spot for campaigns in 1939-40 though and I may even save some pennies and shell out on one of these.


Quoted Text

Dragon has announced the first variant in a popular Panzer family. They also have a new figure set.

Link to Item

If you have comments or questions please post them here.

Thanks!

bill_c
Staff MemberCampaigns Administrator
MODEL SHIPWRIGHTS
Visit this Community
New Jersey, United States
Joined: January 09, 2008
KitMaker: 10,553 posts
Armorama: 8,109 posts
Posted: Friday, July 13, 2012 - 03:40 AM UTC

Quoted Text

Just wish they would crack on with some very early Pz.KpfW Mk IIIs.


The problem is the Pz. III Ausf. A-D is a VERY different vehicle from the E onward (see this thread). Instead of the torsion bar suspension, for example, it has leaf springs, so there would be a LOT of retooling.

And it's a tank that saw limited action in those early iterations, something like 70 total produced, so Dragon might be wondering how many kits they'd sell. The early IVs don't involve so much retooling from later kits.
SgtRam
Staff MemberContributing Writer
AEROSCALE
#197
Visit this Community
Ontario, Canada
Joined: March 06, 2011
KitMaker: 3,971 posts
Armorama: 2,859 posts
Posted: Friday, July 13, 2012 - 03:46 AM UTC
This early Panzer IV is tempting me, but I have so much I want to build, never seems to be enough time.....
bill_c
Staff MemberCampaigns Administrator
MODEL SHIPWRIGHTS
Visit this Community
New Jersey, United States
Joined: January 09, 2008
KitMaker: 10,553 posts
Armorama: 8,109 posts
Posted: Friday, July 13, 2012 - 03:53 AM UTC

Quoted Text

This early Panzer IV is tempting me, but I have so much I want to build, never seems to be enough time.....


Shhh, that's how resellers make their living: from modeler/hoarders.

One guy I know said he gets his kit from the "three Ds."

Death

Divorce

Debt

simon2301
Visit this Community
United Kingdom
Joined: January 02, 2011
KitMaker: 23 posts
Armorama: 18 posts
Posted: Friday, July 13, 2012 - 06:41 AM UTC
Guaranteed they were very different but Brach Models have done a Pz IIIB in resin and I think I recall Coree Models did an early PzIII too. If DML/Cyber Hobby can hammer out all the Neubaufahrzeugs as new tools, then a Pz III A,B,C or D shouldn't present any undue problems AND there were more of them than the Neubaufahrzeugs!


Quoted Text


Quoted Text

Just wish they would crack on with some very early Pz.KpfW Mk IIIs.


The problem is the Pz. III Ausf. A-D is a VERY different vehicle from the E onward (see this thread). Instead of the torsion bar suspension, for example, it has leaf springs, so there would be a LOT of retooling.

And it's a tank that saw limited action in those early iterations, something like 70 total produced, so Dragon might be wondering how many kits they'd sell. The early IVs don't involve so much retooling from later kits.

bill_c
Staff MemberCampaigns Administrator
MODEL SHIPWRIGHTS
Visit this Community
New Jersey, United States
Joined: January 09, 2008
KitMaker: 10,553 posts
Armorama: 8,109 posts
Posted: Friday, July 13, 2012 - 07:14 AM UTC
Simon, there's no question DML CAN do an early III, but that doesn't mean they think there's enough of a market to justify the tooling cost.
panzerbob01
Visit this Community
Louisiana, United States
Joined: March 06, 2010
KitMaker: 3,128 posts
Armorama: 2,959 posts
Posted: Friday, July 13, 2012 - 04:56 PM UTC
I can't say I am really sent by seeing this come out - I like the IV, but - I'm probably "blind" but it doesn't look much different to me compared to that CyberHobby IV-B kit. I'm sure I'm missing something here - just not sure what!

Still... it does complete the IV family, and now we do have the option, so...!

I'd echo all who wish that there would appear a III A, B or C kit... Now THAT would be a little more interesting! Meanwhile, the D and CH have offered a III G and another III J kit. Yawn.

@Bill C.;

You aren't suggesting that the number actually built matters, are you? There were all of what? 2 Dicker Max, only one of that rather cool new "LeFH 18/40/2 (sf) auf GW Pz Kpfw III/IV Dragon just kitted, perhaps 40 IV B, etc. etc. etc. And there were but one of each of those named Tigers Dragon has been so fond of! Rare never seemed to phase the D in the past - why now?! Hey, there were perhaps 35 of these "A" built.

Given the numbers of folks I've seen posting something about wanting an early III, I'd bet the D could sell as many of those as he will these IV-A kits!

Cheers!

Bob
TheFaust
Visit this Community
Alaska, United States
Joined: February 06, 2007
KitMaker: 3 posts
Armorama: 1 posts
Posted: Friday, July 13, 2012 - 09:57 PM UTC
Well, at least its not another prototype paper panzer.
wbill76
Visit this Community
Texas, United States
Joined: May 02, 2006
KitMaker: 5,425 posts
Armorama: 4,659 posts
Posted: Saturday, July 14, 2012 - 10:24 AM UTC
Now this raises an interesting possibility...by tooling a Pz IV Ausf A as a "Smart Kit", I wonder if this means that DML is setting plans to offer "Smart Kit" variants of the B-E "Super Kits"? Only time will tell I guess, but it does expand the Smart Kit line into the earlier variants where previously it had stopped at the F.

For the curious, the A had many different features that were unique vs. the B (drum-style cupola, square-style vision flaps on the turret front, split hatches for the driver and radio operator, the angled front hull with the ball MG mount, that funky hull-side AA MG swing-mount, etc.) so it will stand out on its own as a result I think. Will have to add this one to the list of kits to keep an eye on for the future.
bill_c
Staff MemberCampaigns Administrator
MODEL SHIPWRIGHTS
Visit this Community
New Jersey, United States
Joined: January 09, 2008
KitMaker: 10,553 posts
Armorama: 8,109 posts
Posted: Sunday, July 15, 2012 - 05:02 AM UTC

Quoted Text

@Bill C.; You aren't suggesting that the number actually built matters, are you? There were all of what? 2 Dicker Max, only one of that rather cool new "LeFH 18/40/2 (sf) auf GW Pz Kpfw III/IV Dragon just kitted, perhaps 40 IV B, etc. etc. etc. And there were but one of each of those named Tigers Dragon has been so fond of! Rare never seemed to phase the D in the past - why now?! Hey, there were perhaps 35 of these "A" built.


Bob, the number built I think in this case will have a bearing on Dragon's thinking. They have had such a success with later versions of the III that work off the same basic tooling. Paper panzers and limited vehicles don't necessarily compare here. That's because the scarce or theoretical items like the Dicker Max are cool-looking, whereas the early III isn't that different in general physical outlines from the later versions. As for Tigers, there seems to be no limit to the number of them modelers will buy....

And while I don't mean to be disrespectful, the small handful of modelers saying "I want a Pz. III A-D" is tiny compared to the number of kits DML would have to sell to justify the investment. Far more likely will be the lobbying that goes on among Chinese bloggers than the few of us who would post something here.

Your mileage may vary.
Nito74
Visit this Community
Lisboa, Portugal
Joined: March 04, 2008
KitMaker: 5,386 posts
Armorama: 4,727 posts
Posted: Sunday, July 15, 2012 - 05:08 AM UTC
Gonna get this one for sure... and build it too ..
chumpo
Visit this Community
United States
Joined: August 30, 2010
KitMaker: 749 posts
Armorama: 521 posts
Posted: Sunday, July 15, 2012 - 07:41 AM UTC
seems like the smart kits cost so much that sometimes its better to buy the super kits.
AFVFan
Visit this Community
North Carolina, United States
Joined: May 17, 2012
KitMaker: 1,980 posts
Armorama: 1,571 posts
Posted: Sunday, July 15, 2012 - 09:34 AM UTC
This is really hi-jacking the main point of the thread, but I'm going to jump in. A few weeks back I started a thread about the early III models. A lot of the points mentioned here were brought up on it. I, too, am one who would jump at the chance to build one of them (or 2, or 3....). I would think that a German tank with documented real world history would definitely have better sales numbers than any of the "paper panzers".

The III has already proven to be an "in demand" vehicle. Why else would so many companies keep puttting out so many variants? Instead of just another common variant, what kind of small goldmine would a completely new III be?

As Bill mentioned, R&D costs would be a possible problem, but would they be any more than those for any other new model a company brings out? If it were truly that bad, how could the smaller companies, like Mirage and RPM (just to name a couple) do it? Granted, their models lack a lot of the refinements of the bigger names, They do make them though, and they do it at 30% to 50% of what the big companies charge?

In the other thread someone asked if I had written the companies to let them know of my wish. I have since contacted the "big 4" and will be doing so with others. I encourage any one interested in seeing an early III on the market, at a reasonable price, to do the same.
Removed by original poster on 07/16/12 - 04:13:10 (GMT).
 _GOTOTOP