Anyways.
New turret top for this one.
Supports for the ERA tiles.
ERA tiles.
The ERA tiles have the bolts.
Easy paint scheme here.
Also comes with a nice KTD laser range finder above the main gun.
Яusso-Soviэt Forum
Russian or Soviet vehicles/armor modeling forum.
Russian or Soviet vehicles/armor modeling forum.
Hosted by Darren Baker, Jacques Duquette
Trumpeter T-64MV
ComradeMP
#0
Joined: July 31, 2011
KitMaker: 472 posts
Armorama: 453 posts
Posted: Friday, October 26, 2012 - 06:07 PM UTC
Just got this one in the mail today. Don't know if I'll start it anytime soon. Still have the 62 mod.72 to finish, the T-64 and several KV's and my Type-74 Banchou what if project.......
Anyways.
New turret top for this one.
Supports for the ERA tiles.
ERA tiles.
The ERA tiles have the bolts.
Easy paint scheme here.
Also comes with a nice KTD laser range finder above the main gun.
Anyways.
New turret top for this one.
Supports for the ERA tiles.
ERA tiles.
The ERA tiles have the bolts.
Easy paint scheme here.
Also comes with a nice KTD laser range finder above the main gun.
SovietBoy22
Joined: September 04, 2011
KitMaker: 461 posts
Armorama: 452 posts
Posted: Friday, October 26, 2012 - 11:25 PM UTC
It looks great. I've gotta get one.
Thanks
Euan
Thanks
Euan
bison126
Joined: June 10, 2004
KitMaker: 5,329 posts
Armorama: 5,204 posts
Posted: Saturday, October 27, 2012 - 07:59 AM UTC
I guess the supports for the ERA bricks are PE parts or are they simply plastic?
The details on the ERA bricks are quite good.
Olivier
The details on the ERA bricks are quite good.
Olivier
KurtLaughlin
Joined: January 18, 2003
KitMaker: 2,402 posts
Armorama: 2,377 posts
Posted: Saturday, October 27, 2012 - 09:26 AM UTC
Why is the thread header "T-64MV"?
ComradeMP
#0
Joined: July 31, 2011
KitMaker: 472 posts
Armorama: 453 posts
Posted: Saturday, October 27, 2012 - 12:37 PM UTC
Oh, if the mods could please fix the title for me. Thanks.
The supports are plastic. Would have been nice if they were PE, but the plastic ones don't look to bad.
The supports are plastic. Would have been nice if they were PE, but the plastic ones don't look to bad.
Jacques
Joined: March 04, 2003
KitMaker: 4,630 posts
Armorama: 4,498 posts
Posted: Sunday, October 28, 2012 - 05:07 PM UTC
Never have been able to figure out how to change the title. It is NOT the T-64MV anyhow... 
The ERA looks to be VERY nice. Worth buying just for that.
The ERA looks to be VERY nice. Worth buying just for that.
kaleu
Joined: June 11, 2003
KitMaker: 123 posts
Armorama: 112 posts
Posted: Tuesday, October 30, 2012 - 06:18 AM UTC
Oh, another kit to add to the pile of shame. Does anyone have any pictures of it and what is the correct designation, if one exists?
Jacques
Joined: March 04, 2003
KitMaker: 4,630 posts
Armorama: 4,498 posts
Posted: Tuesday, October 30, 2012 - 03:22 PM UTC
The box top designation is correct. The THREAD title is INCORRECT. And no, as Moderator, I cannot change the title. But I tried.
And the ERA still looks freakin' cool.
And the ERA still looks freakin' cool.
ComradeMP
#0
Joined: July 31, 2011
KitMaker: 472 posts
Armorama: 453 posts
Posted: Tuesday, October 30, 2012 - 05:58 PM UTC
Yeah, mistype on my end... 
One can hope that the T-64 will get the same treatment. From the way things have been going in their releases, we might just see the T-64B and later the T-64BV. Man I really want a good T-64BV.
Built the skif kit, but doesn't quite look right.
One can hope that the T-64 will get the same treatment. From the way things have been going in their releases, we might just see the T-64B and later the T-64BV. Man I really want a good T-64BV.
Built the skif kit, but doesn't quite look right.
 |
WEB HOSTING BY
Copyright ©2021 Armorama and Kitmaker Network, a subsidiary of Silver Star Enterprises
All Rights Reserved. Please read our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.
All Rights Reserved. Please read our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.