I built this Bradley before the announcement about the M2A2 ODS from Tamiya.
The "Dog House" sun visor was scratched built using pictures taken from Rob(SABOT) and my memmory of the Bradley's I worked on. I also corrected the gun mantlet cover.
So what do you all think??????
Constructive Feedback
For in-progress or completed build photos. Give and get contructive feedback!
For in-progress or completed build photos. Give and get contructive feedback!
Hosted by Darren Baker, Dave O'Meara
Bradley, Part 2 - IFOR This Time!
Epi
Texas, United States
Joined: December 22, 2001
KitMaker: 3,586 posts
Armorama: 2,556 posts
Joined: December 22, 2001
KitMaker: 3,586 posts
Armorama: 2,556 posts
Posted: Monday, November 17, 2003 - 05:45 PM UTC
Major_Goose
Kikladhes, Greece / Ελλάδα
Joined: September 30, 2003
KitMaker: 6,871 posts
Armorama: 2,071 posts
Joined: September 30, 2003
KitMaker: 6,871 posts
Armorama: 2,071 posts
Posted: Monday, November 17, 2003 - 06:22 PM UTC
it looks......very nice though the pictures i believe hide some of the cromatic detail and the weathering but as fas i can see looks nice build and nicely detailed
Congrats buddy
Congrats buddy
RotorHead67
Virginia, United States
Joined: May 07, 2003
KitMaker: 1,174 posts
Armorama: 772 posts
Joined: May 07, 2003
KitMaker: 1,174 posts
Armorama: 772 posts
Posted: Monday, November 17, 2003 - 06:40 PM UTC
EPI,
Beautiful piece. Nice execution of the color scheme, although the tric-color versus sand hides the detail in the pics. Great detailing too. Todd
Beautiful piece. Nice execution of the color scheme, although the tric-color versus sand hides the detail in the pics. Great detailing too. Todd
Epi
Texas, United States
Joined: December 22, 2001
KitMaker: 3,586 posts
Armorama: 2,556 posts
Joined: December 22, 2001
KitMaker: 3,586 posts
Armorama: 2,556 posts
Posted: Monday, November 17, 2003 - 06:48 PM UTC
Thanks Todd and Goose, but like Goos said, the picture taken could of been better. I am using a new camera and I havnt gotten use to it.
By the way, I just added the picture of the Engine compartment. I forgot that one.
By the way, I just added the picture of the Engine compartment. I forgot that one.
LaTtEX
Metro Manila, Philippines
Joined: May 13, 2003
KitMaker: 292 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: May 13, 2003
KitMaker: 292 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Monday, November 17, 2003 - 07:37 PM UTC
You should try taking pictures of it outdoors in sunlight
ptruhe
Texas, United States
Joined: March 05, 2003
KitMaker: 2,092 posts
Armorama: 1,607 posts
Joined: March 05, 2003
KitMaker: 2,092 posts
Armorama: 1,607 posts
Posted: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 - 04:02 AM UTC
Looks great. What are those two panel things on the front of the turret?
I like how you put some of the bottom panels in the inverted position. Do you know why this done?
Any pre-paint photos?
http://www.defenselink.mil/photos/Jan1996/951231-F-8381L-001.jpg
Paul
I like how you put some of the bottom panels in the inverted position. Do you know why this done?
Any pre-paint photos?
http://www.defenselink.mil/photos/Jan1996/951231-F-8381L-001.jpg
Paul
Epi
Texas, United States
Joined: December 22, 2001
KitMaker: 3,586 posts
Armorama: 2,556 posts
Joined: December 22, 2001
KitMaker: 3,586 posts
Armorama: 2,556 posts
Posted: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 - 05:46 AM UTC
Paul,
I'm not sure what those panels on the turret are for. Those came after I got out of active duty and we dont have them in the National Guard. I wonder if they are in the same line as the panels on the front of the turret of the M1A1. This seems like a good question for Rob(SABOT). They might even be CIP/IFF panels too.
The side skirts are inverted to avoid mud from clumping up in the road wheels and drive sprocket to avoid throwing a track. The same is done on the M1A1 and M113. Notice the last skirt on the M1A1 is aslways missing. On some M113, the rubber skirt is sometimes missing too.
I'm not sure what those panels on the turret are for. Those came after I got out of active duty and we dont have them in the National Guard. I wonder if they are in the same line as the panels on the front of the turret of the M1A1. This seems like a good question for Rob(SABOT). They might even be CIP/IFF panels too.
The side skirts are inverted to avoid mud from clumping up in the road wheels and drive sprocket to avoid throwing a track. The same is done on the M1A1 and M113. Notice the last skirt on the M1A1 is aslways missing. On some M113, the rubber skirt is sometimes missing too.
turrettoad13
Mississippi, United States
Joined: February 26, 2003
KitMaker: 607 posts
Armorama: 490 posts
Joined: February 26, 2003
KitMaker: 607 posts
Armorama: 490 posts
Posted: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 - 08:49 AM UTC
Great job , not to be a mud slingin tanker , but i think that the arm to the right of the 25 mm is suposed to be attached to the gun mount (right ?) I like the name on the TOW launcher . You being from Texas I take that to be a Stevie Ray Vaughn tribute . (just a guess) I named my M1A1 the same thing D-22 = "double-trouble " . Keep up the great work -toad-13 out
SEDimmick
New Jersey, United States
Joined: March 15, 2002
KitMaker: 1,745 posts
Armorama: 1,483 posts
Joined: March 15, 2002
KitMaker: 1,745 posts
Armorama: 1,483 posts
Posted: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 - 10:03 AM UTC
The panels on the front of the turret are the same thing as whats on the M1A1...CIP/IFF panels
I have some photos I took while in Bosina over on Track Link that shows them...
I have some photos I took while in Bosina over on Track Link that shows them...
Epi
Texas, United States
Joined: December 22, 2001
KitMaker: 3,586 posts
Armorama: 2,556 posts
Joined: December 22, 2001
KitMaker: 3,586 posts
Armorama: 2,556 posts
Posted: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 - 05:58 PM UTC
Turrettoad,
You are correct. Also the round ejector port right under that arm is missing too. I didnt bother with changing and adding that.
Actually, I got this track idea from the Concord book on the Bradley. A picture of this one was in it during service in Bosnia.
You are correct. Also the round ejector port right under that arm is missing too. I didnt bother with changing and adding that.
Actually, I got this track idea from the Concord book on the Bradley. A picture of this one was in it during service in Bosnia.
sgtreef
Oklahoma, United States
Joined: March 01, 2002
KitMaker: 6,043 posts
Armorama: 4,347 posts
Joined: March 01, 2002
KitMaker: 6,043 posts
Armorama: 4,347 posts
Posted: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 - 11:09 PM UTC
Nice job Pete so is the motor a resin thing or scratched overall great job and a fast build. (++) (:-)
Graywolf
Senior Editor
Izmir, Turkey / Türkçe
Joined: December 01, 2001
KitMaker: 6,405 posts
Armorama: 1,850 posts
Joined: December 01, 2001
KitMaker: 6,405 posts
Armorama: 1,850 posts
Posted: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 - 11:36 PM UTC
very nice modelling,painting and weathering...photographs are also great....congrats Pete
Epi
Texas, United States
Joined: December 22, 2001
KitMaker: 3,586 posts
Armorama: 2,556 posts
Joined: December 22, 2001
KitMaker: 3,586 posts
Armorama: 2,556 posts
Posted: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 - 03:14 PM UTC
Sgt Reef,
The engine compartment is from Real Models.
Thanks again guys for your comments.
The engine compartment is from Real Models.
Thanks again guys for your comments.