Яusso-Soviэt Forum
Russian or Soviet vehicles/armor modeling forum.
Russian or Soviet vehicles/armor modeling forum.
Hosted by Darren Baker, Jacques Duquette
What needs to be done to Tamiya T-55 to make
phantom8747
Alabama, United States
Joined: March 09, 2015
KitMaker: 281 posts
Armorama: 273 posts
Joined: March 09, 2015
KitMaker: 281 posts
Armorama: 273 posts
Posted: Monday, February 29, 2016 - 05:43 PM UTC
a Chinese T-59 tank?Thanks.
bison126
Correze, France
Joined: June 10, 2004
KitMaker: 5,329 posts
Armorama: 5,204 posts
Joined: June 10, 2004
KitMaker: 5,329 posts
Armorama: 5,204 posts
Posted: Monday, February 29, 2016 - 06:38 PM UTC
If I'm correct the Chinese Type-59 is basically a T-54 not a T-55.
So it shouldn't be a big deal to backdate the Tamiya kit.
Picture for discussion purpose only.
But if you intend to depict the version with slat armor, side skirts and more mods, you have a conversion by Legend.
Olivier
So it shouldn't be a big deal to backdate the Tamiya kit.
Picture for discussion purpose only.
But if you intend to depict the version with slat armor, side skirts and more mods, you have a conversion by Legend.
Olivier
Jacques
Minnesota, United States
Joined: March 04, 2003
KitMaker: 4,630 posts
Armorama: 4,498 posts
Joined: March 04, 2003
KitMaker: 4,630 posts
Armorama: 4,498 posts
Posted: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 - 12:00 AM UTC
Type 59 as in WoT? Different from most conversions available which build Iraqi Type-59's.
Type-59 is a copy of the T-54B, generally.
Type-59 is a copy of the T-54B, generally.
phantom8747
Alabama, United States
Joined: March 09, 2015
KitMaker: 281 posts
Armorama: 273 posts
Joined: March 09, 2015
KitMaker: 281 posts
Armorama: 273 posts
Posted: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 - 06:14 PM UTC
Thanks Jacques and Olivier.More civil answer than I receieved on another forum
Removed by original poster on 03/03/16 - 14:18:05 (GMT).
BornToDig
Maryland, United States
Joined: December 25, 2002
KitMaker: 345 posts
Armorama: 311 posts
Joined: December 25, 2002
KitMaker: 345 posts
Armorama: 311 posts
Posted: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 - 09:34 PM UTC
The a-hole quotient here is a good deal lower.
RLlockie
United Kingdom
Joined: September 06, 2013
KitMaker: 1,112 posts
Armorama: 938 posts
Joined: September 06, 2013
KitMaker: 1,112 posts
Armorama: 938 posts
Posted: Thursday, March 03, 2016 - 12:15 AM UTC
Such assessments are arguably matters of opinion rather than fact, wouldn't you say? And everyone is entitled to their opinion (in my opinion, anyway).
BornToDig
Maryland, United States
Joined: December 25, 2002
KitMaker: 345 posts
Armorama: 311 posts
Joined: December 25, 2002
KitMaker: 345 posts
Armorama: 311 posts
Posted: Thursday, March 03, 2016 - 01:16 AM UTC
Your opinion may be valid
Jacques
Minnesota, United States
Joined: March 04, 2003
KitMaker: 4,630 posts
Armorama: 4,498 posts
Joined: March 04, 2003
KitMaker: 4,630 posts
Armorama: 4,498 posts
Posted: Thursday, March 03, 2016 - 01:51 AM UTC
Again, it really depends on WHAT you are trying to represent. The Type-59 in WoT, which I will try to build some day for giggles, is not what we are most used to seeing, which is the Iraqi version with the bar-armor and such. It will take two totally different approaches to build either vehicle, which are both nominally called a Type-59. And there are other options than just those two I have mentioned.
So knowing what you want to replicate is the first, most important step.
So knowing what you want to replicate is the first, most important step.
chefchris
North Carolina, United States
Joined: February 06, 2006
KitMaker: 1,544 posts
Armorama: 1,464 posts
Joined: February 06, 2006
KitMaker: 1,544 posts
Armorama: 1,464 posts
Posted: Sunday, March 06, 2016 - 08:16 AM UTC
I guess now you could just wait for the Takom T69 II or the T54 that's just been announced!
vettejack
Florida, United States
Joined: November 23, 2012
KitMaker: 1,277 posts
Armorama: 1,254 posts
Joined: November 23, 2012
KitMaker: 1,277 posts
Armorama: 1,254 posts
Posted: Sunday, March 06, 2016 - 09:24 AM UTC
Buy a whole new kit that is T54?