Any more pics of the T-44 100 prototype with the DSHK on the turret....hubba, hubba.

I keep looking at this photo- the guys standing right next to it are essentially as tall as the tank. This seem wrong. I would think any tank including the T-44 would be much taller than a person. Is it a 1/2 scale mock-up? Just asking the question...

Right ?!

MiniArt's release of the T 44 was my intro to it and she's quite a sexy gal .
I'm waiting for the 100's release

But then I see this huge rhino-beak 122mm on a T-44 in WOT and - no . NO .
No . wrong and hideous

So now - being a complete neophyte with Soviet armor - I am trying to figure out what is real and what isn't .

I can't tell from these pics , but even the wheel arrangements look different throughout.

I guess the "T-44" utilized several different turrets and had some significant hull mods .
To be expected for sure ...........

I just watched the video on YouTube, and it is not the same tank as in the first photo. The vision slot on the glacis plate is different, and the tank in the video doesn't have a muzzlebrake. The mystery continues...

There is still something fishy with that photo, regardless of what type of tank it is. The ammo sitting on the fender is got to be at least 3 feet long and it is much bigger than the height of the turret. I'm not an expert on Russian tanks- whatever it is, it is really small. Like I said earlier maybe a undersized mock-up...

I have this photo in a book by Maxim Kolomiyets in bigger size. I beleive it's a real tank, not a maquette - a thing with sizes of people and tank hight is all about an angle from which a pictures has been taken and about depth of field. People are standing closer to photographer and a turret is further, being situated in the middle of a tank's hull.
122mm round is really that size - about 90cm and it's shell weighs about 25-30kg. That's why 122mm was unpractical for use on the medium tank - it was hard to play with it in a turret, and a tank could carry much less rounds.