Armor/AFV
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
Hosted by Darren Baker, Mario Matijasic
News
Bronco: North Africa StuG III Ausf. Dvaranusk
Managing Editor
Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain / España
Joined: July 04, 2013
KitMaker: 1,288 posts
Armorama: 942 posts
Joined: July 04, 2013
KitMaker: 1,288 posts
Armorama: 942 posts
Posted: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 - 04:38 PM UTC
There is a new upcoming StuG III variant from Bronco, the Ausf. D as was operated in North Africa.
Read the Full News Story
If you have comments or questions please post them here.
Thanks!
AOS
Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
Joined: September 29, 2005
KitMaker: 75 posts
Armorama: 74 posts
Joined: September 29, 2005
KitMaker: 75 posts
Armorama: 74 posts
Posted: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 - 06:17 PM UTC
Great News, I always wanted to build one of these StuGs with the additional air filters ! Definitely on my list.
By the way - there is a little detail to distinguish Ausf.C and D. They should have different locks on the transmission hatches. You get both parts in the DML StuG III C/D kit (no.6009 , parts C15 and C24).
By the way - there is a little detail to distinguish Ausf.C and D. They should have different locks on the transmission hatches. You get both parts in the DML StuG III C/D kit (no.6009 , parts C15 and C24).
hanb7323
Daejeon, Korea / 대한민국
Joined: October 06, 2014
KitMaker: 408 posts
Armorama: 407 posts
Joined: October 06, 2014
KitMaker: 408 posts
Armorama: 407 posts
Posted: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 - 06:29 PM UTC
Dragon would announce DAK stug.
Bizarre
Akershus, Norway
Joined: July 20, 2010
KitMaker: 1,709 posts
Armorama: 1,581 posts
Joined: July 20, 2010
KitMaker: 1,709 posts
Armorama: 1,581 posts
Posted: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 - 09:14 PM UTC
cool
Posted: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 - 10:26 PM UTC
I gotta admit that I am not very interested in limited-use subjects, but Sonderverband 288 StuGs are interesting - all three of them! I'll order one of these.
Tojo72
North Carolina, United States
Joined: June 06, 2006
KitMaker: 4,691 posts
Armorama: 3,509 posts
Joined: June 06, 2006
KitMaker: 4,691 posts
Armorama: 3,509 posts
Posted: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 - 11:11 PM UTC
I like it,especially the workable tracks.
bill_c
Campaigns Administrator
New Jersey, United States
Joined: January 09, 2008
KitMaker: 10,553 posts
Armorama: 8,109 posts
Joined: January 09, 2008
KitMaker: 10,553 posts
Armorama: 8,109 posts
Posted: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 - 11:19 PM UTC
Glad to see they are expanding the III chassis franchise begun with the Pz. III A.
knewton
New Zealand
Joined: June 19, 2013
KitMaker: 1,217 posts
Armorama: 1,092 posts
Joined: June 19, 2013
KitMaker: 1,217 posts
Armorama: 1,092 posts
Posted: Thursday, July 21, 2016 - 12:05 AM UTC
Yep, as much as I like my 'E', I would have brought this instead had I of known. But then, two StuGs are better than one...
bilbobee
Minnesota, United States
Joined: February 28, 2015
KitMaker: 414 posts
Armorama: 406 posts
Joined: February 28, 2015
KitMaker: 414 posts
Armorama: 406 posts
Posted: Thursday, July 21, 2016 - 02:30 AM UTC
This is good news, thanks bronco, workable tracks!
bill_c
Campaigns Administrator
New Jersey, United States
Joined: January 09, 2008
KitMaker: 10,553 posts
Armorama: 8,109 posts
Joined: January 09, 2008
KitMaker: 10,553 posts
Armorama: 8,109 posts
Posted: Thursday, July 21, 2016 - 02:42 AM UTC
And guys, next time Dragon or Trumpy brings out a vehicle that had 2-3 produced, let's not be quite so hard on them. Only three of these saw service, that's pretty specialized.
johhar
Alabama, United States
Joined: September 22, 2008
KitMaker: 476 posts
Armorama: 447 posts
Joined: September 22, 2008
KitMaker: 476 posts
Armorama: 447 posts
Posted: Thursday, July 21, 2016 - 03:08 AM UTC
This is a hard model not to like. Rare subject may be a turn-off for some, but at least it was real. Cool looking exterior with all the jerry cans, road wheels, etc. Bronco quality and detail. Workable tracks. I could go on. I'm betting there is at least Dragon level interior, if not more. Whether it's anyone's cup of tea or not, it's a strong product. And, let's face, you can never build too many StuGs.
Bravo1102
New Jersey, United States
Joined: December 08, 2003
KitMaker: 2,864 posts
Armorama: 2,497 posts
Joined: December 08, 2003
KitMaker: 2,864 posts
Armorama: 2,497 posts
Posted: Thursday, July 21, 2016 - 05:08 AM UTC
Poor Dragon went too far afield to find German one-offs and skipped some cooler subjects. But the Dragon has been sidestepping early Stug III for some reason.
ULIX-VM
Puerto Rico
Joined: February 22, 2016
KitMaker: 834 posts
Armorama: 649 posts
Joined: February 22, 2016
KitMaker: 834 posts
Armorama: 649 posts
Posted: Thursday, July 21, 2016 - 05:40 AM UTC
bronco from china but design ww2 german armor.
WAYNEO
Nelson, New Zealand
Joined: January 24, 2016
KitMaker: 42 posts
Armorama: 40 posts
Joined: January 24, 2016
KitMaker: 42 posts
Armorama: 40 posts
Posted: Thursday, July 21, 2016 - 11:29 AM UTC
Hey on the bright side its a nice new AusfC/D ,remove all the trop add on stuff and bingo you have c/d sug and dragon hasnt touched that one yet,not counting the old one. So it is not really limited to just 3 vehicles is it. Now watch how fast we see one from Dragon.Now if Bronco would just shrink it 48th then we are talking. Have fun Wayne
M4A1Sherman
New York, United States
Joined: May 02, 2013
KitMaker: 4,403 posts
Armorama: 4,078 posts
Joined: May 02, 2013
KitMaker: 4,403 posts
Armorama: 4,078 posts
Posted: Thursday, July 21, 2016 - 10:26 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Poor Dragon went too far afield to find German one-offs and skipped some cooler subjects. But the Dragon has been sidestepping early Stug III for some reason.
I wouldn't expect any earlier StuG-types from DRAGON; why would they make any effort to do something entirely new, when they only have to bring out a "NEW!!!" kit by switching a few parts around..? Doing otherwise would require too much thought...
Hang on to your hats, friends- MINIART showed "early" and initial StuGs in their 2016 line-up just this last Winter. TWO new kits- an "A0" and some other type, of which the designation escapes me at the moment. Sorry, I'm not "hard-wired" for German WWII stuff...
PS- "POOR DRAGON"..? Those bone-heads have only themselves to blame for the ever-growing ranks of modellers who are becoming disenchanted with their wares... Read the forum regarding DRAGON's new M60...
Posted: Friday, July 22, 2016 - 12:07 AM UTC
Badass stance on that puppy, looks like a fun build...
M4A1Sherman
New York, United States
Joined: May 02, 2013
KitMaker: 4,403 posts
Armorama: 4,078 posts
Joined: May 02, 2013
KitMaker: 4,403 posts
Armorama: 4,078 posts
Posted: Friday, July 22, 2016 - 04:45 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Glad to see they are expanding the III chassis franchise begun with the Pz. III A.
Hi, Bill! How are you coming along with that Pz.III "A", anyway..? Haven't even started mine, yet...
Wierdy
Ukraine / Україна
Joined: January 26, 2010
KitMaker: 570 posts
Armorama: 553 posts
Joined: January 26, 2010
KitMaker: 570 posts
Armorama: 553 posts
Posted: Friday, July 22, 2016 - 06:34 PM UTC
bill_c
Campaigns Administrator
New Jersey, United States
Joined: January 09, 2008
KitMaker: 10,553 posts
Armorama: 8,109 posts
Joined: January 09, 2008
KitMaker: 10,553 posts
Armorama: 8,109 posts
Posted: Monday, July 25, 2016 - 02:14 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Hi, Bill! How are you coming along with that Pz.III "A", anyway..? Haven't even started mine, yet...
The kit was missing the commander's cupola, so it is in transit to me from the UK. Once I get it, the kit will be finished. It needed some filling where the rear deck pieces don't fit properly, just like the MiniArt kits it is likely derived from.
Tojo72
North Carolina, United States
Joined: June 06, 2006
KitMaker: 4,691 posts
Armorama: 3,509 posts
Joined: June 06, 2006
KitMaker: 4,691 posts
Armorama: 3,509 posts
Posted: Monday, July 25, 2016 - 03:22 AM UTC
Magic Tracks and DS uniforms,cool.Like everything else,reviews and price matter,because Bronco kits are no bargain neither.So I'll see which one look better.
Bravo1102
New Jersey, United States
Joined: December 08, 2003
KitMaker: 2,864 posts
Armorama: 2,497 posts
Joined: December 08, 2003
KitMaker: 2,864 posts
Armorama: 2,497 posts
Posted: Monday, July 25, 2016 - 05:13 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Quoted TextPoor Dragon went too far afield to find German one-offs and skipped some cooler subjects. But the Dragon has been sidestepping early Stug III for some reason.
I wouldn't expect any earlier StuG-types from DRAGON; why would they make any effort to do something entirely new, when they only have to bring out a "NEW!!!" kit by switching a few parts around..? Doing otherwise would require too much thought...
Hang on to your hats, friends- MINIART showed "early" and initial StuGs in their 2016 line-up just this last Winter. TWO new kits- an "A0" and some other type, of which the designation escapes me at the moment. Sorry, I'm not "hard-wired" for German WWII stuff...
PS- "POOR DRAGON"..? Those bone-heads have only themselves to blame for the ever-growing ranks of modellers who are becoming disenchanted with their wares... Read the forum regarding DRAGON's new M60
Please it's too painful to read that again. Sheer apathy. Real rush job with little concern for anything. They've regressed back to their kits from 25 years ago.
My Sarcasm didn't translate well. Never have such opportunities for excellence been squandered.
I'm reminded of their Sherman V/M4A4 that took them four tries to get "mostly" right. Maybe 10 years down the road we'll see a "premium " re-release with a few more half-arsed attempts at correction.