And someone was saying that they fixed the engine deck on the Egyptian Sherman... Hope they release it soon.
Hisham
Armor/AFV
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
Hosted by Darren Baker, Mario Matijasic
Dragon's IDF M3 Halftrack
Hisham
Al Qahirah, Egypt / لعربية
Joined: July 23, 2004
KitMaker: 6,856 posts
Armorama: 6,363 posts
Joined: July 23, 2004
KitMaker: 6,856 posts
Armorama: 6,363 posts
Posted: Friday, September 23, 2016 - 04:40 AM UTC
Hisham
Al Qahirah, Egypt / لعربية
Joined: July 23, 2004
KitMaker: 6,856 posts
Armorama: 6,363 posts
Joined: July 23, 2004
KitMaker: 6,856 posts
Armorama: 6,363 posts
Posted: Friday, September 23, 2016 - 04:43 AM UTC
MikeyBugs95
New York, United States
Joined: May 27, 2013
KitMaker: 2,210 posts
Armorama: 1,712 posts
Joined: May 27, 2013
KitMaker: 2,210 posts
Armorama: 1,712 posts
Posted: Friday, September 23, 2016 - 04:47 AM UTC
Is that a new T95 in the bottom right corner? If it is I hope it's better than the current one.
laikneth
Singapore / 新加坡
Joined: September 24, 2013
KitMaker: 75 posts
Armorama: 63 posts
Joined: September 24, 2013
KitMaker: 75 posts
Armorama: 63 posts
Posted: Friday, September 23, 2016 - 05:05 AM UTC
Hey there's a pic of the t95 on their facebook page.
https://www.facebook.com/dragonmodels/photos/pcb.1478488415510973/1478488182177663/?type=3&theater
https://www.facebook.com/dragonmodels/photos/pcb.1478488415510973/1478488182177663/?type=3&theater
avenue
Philippines
Joined: May 25, 2013
KitMaker: 544 posts
Armorama: 542 posts
Joined: May 25, 2013
KitMaker: 544 posts
Armorama: 542 posts
Posted: Friday, September 23, 2016 - 06:28 AM UTC
surely,dragon should include the military figure to go with it!
Bravo1102
New Jersey, United States
Joined: December 08, 2003
KitMaker: 2,864 posts
Armorama: 2,497 posts
Joined: December 08, 2003
KitMaker: 2,864 posts
Armorama: 2,497 posts
Posted: Friday, September 23, 2016 - 07:17 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Is that a new T95 in the bottom right corner? If it is I hope it's better than the current one.
It is the current one, just with a what-if, World of Tanks gun tube.
In the real world the T95 and T28 were just different nomenclature for the same vehicle because the Army couldn't decide whether a turret less tank was a tank or a gun motor carriage. In the what-if world it has a different gun tube that neither of the prototypes had. So it's an Allied paper panzer.
MikeyBugs95
New York, United States
Joined: May 27, 2013
KitMaker: 2,210 posts
Armorama: 1,712 posts
Joined: May 27, 2013
KitMaker: 2,210 posts
Armorama: 1,712 posts
Posted: Friday, September 23, 2016 - 11:25 AM UTC
Yeah I see. I just noticed that it has a 155mm gun on it. Rats I was really hoping for a retooled. Oh well, I'll just settle for the current if I ever get it.
Hisham
Al Qahirah, Egypt / لعربية
Joined: July 23, 2004
KitMaker: 6,856 posts
Armorama: 6,363 posts
Joined: July 23, 2004
KitMaker: 6,856 posts
Armorama: 6,363 posts
Posted: Saturday, September 24, 2016 - 02:51 PM UTC
avenue
Philippines
Joined: May 25, 2013
KitMaker: 544 posts
Armorama: 542 posts
Joined: May 25, 2013
KitMaker: 544 posts
Armorama: 542 posts
Posted: Saturday, September 24, 2016 - 03:39 PM UTC
How come there's no syrian (or even egyptian) T-34/85?(or even SU-100)
GaryKato
California, United States
Joined: December 06, 2004
KitMaker: 3,694 posts
Armorama: 2,693 posts
Joined: December 06, 2004
KitMaker: 3,694 posts
Armorama: 2,693 posts
Posted: Saturday, September 24, 2016 - 05:08 PM UTC
I hope Dragon corrected the other errors in the M3A1 half-track.
Cantstopbuyingkits
European Union
Joined: January 28, 2015
KitMaker: 2,099 posts
Armorama: 1,920 posts
Joined: January 28, 2015
KitMaker: 2,099 posts
Armorama: 1,920 posts
Posted: Saturday, September 24, 2016 - 06:17 PM UTC
Is the AMX Sherman still using their 90s era M4A4 parts?
JavierDeLuelmo
Spain / Espaņa
Joined: February 29, 2016
KitMaker: 189 posts
Armorama: 186 posts
Joined: February 29, 2016
KitMaker: 189 posts
Armorama: 186 posts
Posted: Saturday, September 24, 2016 - 06:23 PM UTC
Would be great if they continue the saga and make also the final GM diesel-engined version with the new armour, exhausts, fuel tanks, etc.
davejr
Rhode Island, United States
Joined: October 30, 2005
KitMaker: 91 posts
Armorama: 80 posts
Joined: October 30, 2005
KitMaker: 91 posts
Armorama: 80 posts
Posted: Saturday, September 24, 2016 - 07:04 PM UTC
Quoted Text
what are the problems with dragons m3 half tracks ?I hope Dragon corrected the other errors in the M3A1 half-track.
MikeyBugs95
New York, United States
Joined: May 27, 2013
KitMaker: 2,210 posts
Armorama: 1,712 posts
Joined: May 27, 2013
KitMaker: 2,210 posts
Armorama: 1,712 posts
Posted: Monday, September 26, 2016 - 11:49 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Quoted Textwhat are the problems with dragons m3 half tracks ?I hope Dragon corrected the other errors in the M3A1 half-track.
I know there's small things but if there's any large problems, I too would like to know.
Also, on the T95 w/ 155mm gun. The gun looks a bit short compared to the version WOT has... I don't know if that's of any significance since this is a fantasy version, but I thought I might as well put it out there.
GaryKato
California, United States
Joined: December 06, 2004
KitMaker: 3,694 posts
Armorama: 2,693 posts
Joined: December 06, 2004
KitMaker: 3,694 posts
Armorama: 2,693 posts
Posted: Monday, September 26, 2016 - 12:04 PM UTC
Here's Chris Hughes' review of the Dragon 1/35 M3A1 Half-Track. To me, One of the glaring errors was the rivets instead of screw heads on the armor, but you might not care. Another thing was the mount for the fuel can on the front superstructure. Dragon made a wedge of armor stick out instead of the correct mount, but again, you might not notice it.
Cantstopbuyingkits
European Union
Joined: January 28, 2015
KitMaker: 2,099 posts
Armorama: 1,920 posts
Joined: January 28, 2015
KitMaker: 2,099 posts
Armorama: 1,920 posts
Posted: Monday, September 26, 2016 - 10:42 PM UTC
Fixing the rivet issue would require retooling the entire hull except for the back plate. I don't think Dragon would consider the expenditure worthwhile for a detail you already explained modeller's might not care about,
GeraldOwens
Florida, United States
Joined: March 30, 2006
KitMaker: 3,736 posts
Armorama: 3,697 posts
Joined: March 30, 2006
KitMaker: 3,736 posts
Armorama: 3,697 posts
Posted: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 - 02:45 AM UTC
Yes, it looks good, now. When I saw the original CAD drawings, I was alarmed, so I sent every Internet photo I had of the Latrun Sherman AMX to Pawel, who kindly forwarded them to Dragon (I suspect others may also have sent them Latrun pix, but I hope my little contribution may have may have resulted in a more accurate kit). I also included information gleaned from Vasko Barbic's excellent articles on Egyptian Sherman modifications in Military Modelling Magazine back in the 1980's, which had detailed the Egyptian Army's changes, notably the conversion of the M4A4 hulls to use the twin diesel engines of the M4A2 (nobody but the British liked the Chrysler Multibank), and the details of the early FL-10 turrets.
The turret CAD images Dragon showed more recently still show the coaming on the upper turret for the canvas dust cover, which should be removed, but Dragon did add the rubber dust gasket seen on the earliest AMX-13's and the Egyptian turrets.
Hisham
Al Qahirah, Egypt / لعربية
Joined: July 23, 2004
KitMaker: 6,856 posts
Armorama: 6,363 posts
Joined: July 23, 2004
KitMaker: 6,856 posts
Armorama: 6,363 posts
Posted: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 - 03:07 AM UTC
Thank you, Gerald, for thinking of sending them pics of the correct engine deck.. and I'm glad they fixed it, because I do want to get one when it's released.
Hisham
Hisham