_GOTOBOTTOM
Яusso-Soviэt Forum
Russian or Soviet vehicles/armor modeling forum.
T-34/76 Mod 1940 Rear Hull Question
VMIVince
Visit this Community
North Dakota, United States
Joined: September 28, 2009
KitMaker: 42 posts
Armorama: 36 posts
Posted: Wednesday, February 14, 2018 - 04:02 AM UTC
Gents,

I'm working on the Dragon 1/35 T-34/76 Mod 1940, and I've noticed that there are two small square gaps where the rear hull plate, the fenders, and the transmission cover meet. Here's what I'm talking about:



I've seen some T-34/76 photos on the internet that depict this gap, but others that do not. Can anyone enlighten me on this?

MCR
Visit this Community
Arizona, United States
Joined: July 15, 2004
KitMaker: 464 posts
Armorama: 407 posts
Posted: Thursday, February 15, 2018 - 07:54 PM UTC
I don't have any reference photos at the moment but for a Model '40 (and earlier Model '41's) those gaps should not be there. The hull sides were machined in such a way as there was a pretty tight fit between the hull sides and upper rear plate. Later that changed in order to reduce the amount of precision work needed to make T-34 hulls and to save time.

If you do an on-line search for "AGP T-34 Model '41 photos" and scroll down a bit you should find a good photo of the rear of that early F-34 gunned tank. You may also see a detail or two you want to correct in the DML kit.
VMIVince
Visit this Community
North Dakota, United States
Joined: September 28, 2009
KitMaker: 42 posts
Armorama: 36 posts
Posted: Friday, February 16, 2018 - 01:55 AM UTC
Mark,

Thanks for the response. I suppose it's time to break out the styrene strip.

KurtLaughlin
Visit this Community
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: January 18, 2003
KitMaker: 2,402 posts
Armorama: 2,377 posts
Posted: Saturday, February 17, 2018 - 08:30 AM UTC
Photo of an M1940. The hull side plate should be taller to fill the corner, but the joint stays visible.



KL
MCR
Visit this Community
Arizona, United States
Joined: July 15, 2004
KitMaker: 464 posts
Armorama: 407 posts
Posted: Saturday, February 17, 2018 - 06:37 PM UTC
Good photo, Kurt. Shows exactly what I was trying to describe.
BTW, that's a very early production Model '40. Do you know of any images of this one showing the front?

Mark
KurtLaughlin
Visit this Community
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: January 18, 2003
KitMaker: 2,402 posts
Armorama: 2,377 posts
Posted: Sunday, February 18, 2018 - 04:21 AM UTC

Quoted Text


BTW, that's a very early production Model '40. Do you know of any images of this one showing the front?



What makes it an early M1940 rather than just an M1940?

This tank was in Leshnev, Lvov region, and belonged to the 12th Tank Division of the 8th Mechanized Corps.




KL
MCR
Visit this Community
Arizona, United States
Joined: July 15, 2004
KitMaker: 464 posts
Armorama: 407 posts
Posted: Sunday, February 18, 2018 - 07:50 PM UTC
Ah! I actually have photos 2 and 4 plus another from a slightly different angle. I just didn't recognize it.
"Very early" was a bit of a swing and a miss on my part. It was based on the early track type this one was wearing and I was betting that it might be one of the rare pre-production A-34/T-34's with the single piece front ends. Nope, it is an earlier tank but a standard production one.

Mark
 _GOTOTOP