From Flikr.com
Baghdad turret bunker
Frenchy
Hosted by Darren Baker
Interesting use for a spare T72 turret
Frenchy
Rhone, France
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Posted: Friday, June 29, 2007 - 04:38 AM UTC
ginge82
England - North West, United Kingdom
Joined: May 16, 2007
KitMaker: 65 posts
Armorama: 61 posts
Joined: May 16, 2007
KitMaker: 65 posts
Armorama: 61 posts
Posted: Friday, June 29, 2007 - 04:42 AM UTC
Ha! Ha! Do you think that would actually rotate? Or is it more of an ornament?
mark197205
England - East Midlands, United Kingdom
Joined: November 10, 2003
KitMaker: 1,593 posts
Armorama: 1,465 posts
Joined: November 10, 2003
KitMaker: 1,593 posts
Armorama: 1,465 posts
Posted: Friday, June 29, 2007 - 05:17 AM UTC
Interesting pic Frenchy, thanks for posting it.
Frenchy
Rhone, France
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Posted: Friday, June 29, 2007 - 05:49 AM UTC
I'm not sure it can rotate, but at least it seems to have air-conditioning
Frenchy
Frenchy
Posted: Friday, June 29, 2007 - 06:45 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Do you think that would actually rotate?
Well, you can see that it's on a metal structure and it is airconditioned. I would bet that it rotates just fine. Now, I'd also say that it's more than a bit of overkill as well as not being terribly effective. The mounting appears to be on a bridge or causeway elevated above the surroundings. As the T-72 is not renowned for its ability to depress its barrel much, I can't see how that thing would actually engage anything not on the bridge. Also, with the lack of a co-ax, your only options are to do nothing or to blow any target to it's component atoms with the 125mm. Seems disproportionate, somehow. If you are firing on a suicide bomber in a vehicle, the 125 will definitely initiate whatever the bomber might be transporting. An MG or smaller calibre autocanon might not.
If I was a rational person, pointing the big honkin' gun at me would make me stop whatever I was doing at the time. Suicide bombers are, by definition, at least partially irrational and can't be expeted to react in a predictable manner.
Cool modern pantherturm, though!
Paul
MikeMummey
New Mexico, United States
Joined: February 09, 2005
KitMaker: 672 posts
Armorama: 653 posts
Joined: February 09, 2005
KitMaker: 672 posts
Armorama: 653 posts
Posted: Friday, June 29, 2007 - 02:18 PM UTC
Howdy Paul, how can you tell that the COAX is missing? Looking at the rest of the pictures it appears as if no vehicles would be able to to approach the positon. It looks like a nice comfortable sniper resistant OP to me. "Tanks" for posting the link Frenchy. Out here. Mike sends . . .
LeoCmdr
Alberta, Canada
Joined: January 19, 2005
KitMaker: 4,085 posts
Armorama: 3,917 posts
Joined: January 19, 2005
KitMaker: 4,085 posts
Armorama: 3,917 posts
Posted: Friday, June 29, 2007 - 04:05 PM UTC
Impossible to tell if the coax is not mounted from the images....but there is no AA 12.7mm...is that what you meant Paul?
Here is another image....it looks like it is positioned on a roof top of a building not a roadway.
I would think that it can traverse as it looks like it is on a turret stand.
Really cool little vignette potential.
http://flickr.com/photos/75031815@N00/250765023/in/photostream/
Here is another image....it looks like it is positioned on a roof top of a building not a roadway.
I would think that it can traverse as it looks like it is on a turret stand.
Really cool little vignette potential.
http://flickr.com/photos/75031815@N00/250765023/in/photostream/
Frenchy
Rhone, France
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Posted: Friday, June 29, 2007 - 05:06 PM UTC
Quoted Text
it looks like it is positioned on a roof top of a building not a roadway.
According to another picture caption, it is put on the top of a Iraq Civil Defense Corp bunker...
Frenchy
Posted: Friday, June 29, 2007 - 06:17 PM UTC
Very interesting picture - could be a funny conversion.
I must agree with previous points. Not the most effective placement of bunker I have seen......
Thanks for sharing
I must agree with previous points. Not the most effective placement of bunker I have seen......
Thanks for sharing
mat
Limburg, Netherlands
Joined: November 18, 2003
KitMaker: 894 posts
Armorama: 643 posts
Joined: November 18, 2003
KitMaker: 894 posts
Armorama: 643 posts
Posted: Friday, June 29, 2007 - 08:40 PM UTC
so what happens if they fire that thing? I hope they secured it really well to the roof top it's on.
MSGsummit
Tennessee, United States
Joined: November 16, 2002
KitMaker: 751 posts
Armorama: 545 posts
Joined: November 16, 2002
KitMaker: 751 posts
Armorama: 545 posts
Posted: Saturday, June 30, 2007 - 01:53 AM UTC
Those are Pictures of an ICDC (Iraqi Civil Defence Corp) bunker at what used to be Firebase Melody in Baghdad. It was fully functional but was really a kind of "show of force" and utilized as an armored OP which overlooked a highway on that side of the firebase. If I remember correctly we called the Highway "Canal road" Firebase Melody was an old college dormitory complex and was occupied by Task Force 1-36 Infantry. I spent nearly a year there. After Task Force 1-36 was rotated out the firebase was returned to the college. It is my understanding that after we left the ICDC and Iraqi police actually got into a gun fight looting the place. What a shame. I have no idea how former firebase melody is being used today.
MSGsummit
Tennessee, United States
Joined: November 16, 2002
KitMaker: 751 posts
Armorama: 545 posts
Joined: November 16, 2002
KitMaker: 751 posts
Armorama: 545 posts
Posted: Saturday, June 30, 2007 - 06:15 AM UTC
Something I forgot.... The Turret would rotate 360. As far as the main gun it was never fired. I think it would have blown itself clean off the top of the bunker if it had. Unfortunatley I don't remember if the co-ax was still in it. Like I said more of a show of force and something for the ICDC to take some pride in than anything else.
bulivyf
Vendor
Praha, Czech Republic
Joined: April 03, 2006
KitMaker: 2,450 posts
Armorama: 2,409 posts
Joined: April 03, 2006
KitMaker: 2,450 posts
Armorama: 2,409 posts
Posted: Saturday, June 30, 2007 - 07:16 AM UTC
Hm, Very good scarecrow, but we t scarecrow install on field to spook bird.
Miloslav
Miloslav
LeoCmdr
Alberta, Canada
Joined: January 19, 2005
KitMaker: 4,085 posts
Armorama: 3,917 posts
Joined: January 19, 2005
KitMaker: 4,085 posts
Armorama: 3,917 posts
Posted: Saturday, June 30, 2007 - 08:36 AM UTC
There would be no large rate of fire.
Without the auto-loader components the main gun can still be loaded manually but I wouldn't want two piece ammunition laying around only protected by sandbags.
Without the auto-loader components the main gun can still be loaded manually but I wouldn't want two piece ammunition laying around only protected by sandbags.
Shadowfax
Michigan, United States
Joined: November 02, 2006
KitMaker: 389 posts
Armorama: 351 posts
Joined: November 02, 2006
KitMaker: 389 posts
Armorama: 351 posts
Posted: Saturday, June 30, 2007 - 10:33 AM UTC
It's good to see old ideas still have good uses. I like the added feature of the air conditioning unit stuffed into the sand bags!