Dioramas
Do you love dioramas & vignettes? We sure do.
Do you love dioramas & vignettes? We sure do.
Hosted by Darren Baker, Mario Matijasic
What do you think of this dio?
plasticman
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: June 06, 2006
KitMaker: 152 posts
Armorama: 129 posts
Joined: June 06, 2006
KitMaker: 152 posts
Armorama: 129 posts
Posted: Sunday, August 19, 2007 - 01:46 PM UTC
almost finished. 95% done. let me know if you want to see more photos. having trouble with camera. thanks
jimb
New York, United States
Joined: August 25, 2006
KitMaker: 2,539 posts
Armorama: 238 posts
Joined: August 25, 2006
KitMaker: 2,539 posts
Armorama: 238 posts
Posted: Sunday, August 19, 2007 - 01:48 PM UTC
That's pretty cool. Or should I say cold? Those soldiers better get out of that river pretty quick. I like it a lot. Did you make it?
Jim
Jim
plasticman
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: June 06, 2006
KitMaker: 152 posts
Armorama: 129 posts
Joined: June 06, 2006
KitMaker: 152 posts
Armorama: 129 posts
Posted: Sunday, August 19, 2007 - 01:59 PM UTC
yes I did Jim. Thanks for the positive feedback.
slodder
North Carolina, United States
Joined: February 22, 2002
KitMaker: 11,718 posts
Armorama: 7,138 posts
Joined: February 22, 2002
KitMaker: 11,718 posts
Armorama: 7,138 posts
Posted: Sunday, August 19, 2007 - 02:00 PM UTC
Wow, very cool. My one critique that jumps out at me is the guy standing still in the middle. He's to still, everyone else is 'under fire' he seems to relaxed. If he's dazzed, a better position would be rifle down. Or maybe you can title it "What's going on?????" That way there's no mistaking it, that this guy is a bit confuse having lost his cover and it team. I'd like to see more gloves too.
The water is great, splashes and all. The snow is good. The white wash is great.
More photos would be good.
The water is great, splashes and all. The snow is good. The white wash is great.
More photos would be good.
JeepLC
Virginia, United States
Joined: June 20, 2007
KitMaker: 510 posts
Armorama: 469 posts
Joined: June 20, 2007
KitMaker: 510 posts
Armorama: 469 posts
Posted: Sunday, August 19, 2007 - 02:05 PM UTC
Apsolutely awesome! Everything is done very very well. I would also have to agree about the guy in the middle, however. He is too still. Guys are getting hit all around him and he looks like he is just looking at butterflies. I would also like to adress the .50 cals. The one on the jeep does not have ammo belts or boxes. Other than that it is very well done!
-Mike
-Mike
gsmith
Kentucky, United States
Joined: August 11, 2007
KitMaker: 136 posts
Armorama: 117 posts
Joined: August 11, 2007
KitMaker: 136 posts
Armorama: 117 posts
Posted: Sunday, August 19, 2007 - 02:07 PM UTC
Great job, i love any diorama where water is used well. i hate to see someone walking or running in water with no splash, you did a great job, i would love to see more pictures of this if you can post more or send them to me if you don't want to post more.
thanks for sharing,
Gary
thanks for sharing,
Gary
plasticman
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: June 06, 2006
KitMaker: 152 posts
Armorama: 129 posts
Joined: June 06, 2006
KitMaker: 152 posts
Armorama: 129 posts
Posted: Sunday, August 19, 2007 - 02:14 PM UTC
thanks for all the comments. the guy that is standing still is in shock after the guy in the jeep is hit. In fact, the kit comes from verlinden titled HIT. As you can see, the man is hit, while the other is stunned.
The water effect does have some splashes, I know they are hard to see. Maybe, not enough splashes huh?
And the machine gun I know is not finished. I am about 95% done on this dio. Also, the jeep is missing the JERRY CAN. Had no time to add it.
The water effect does have some splashes, I know they are hard to see. Maybe, not enough splashes huh?
And the machine gun I know is not finished. I am about 95% done on this dio. Also, the jeep is missing the JERRY CAN. Had no time to add it.
plasticman
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: June 06, 2006
KitMaker: 152 posts
Armorama: 129 posts
Joined: June 06, 2006
KitMaker: 152 posts
Armorama: 129 posts
Posted: Sunday, August 19, 2007 - 02:29 PM UTC
more photos, sorry for the blurry ones. more on the way. can only download a couple at a time.
plasticman
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: June 06, 2006
KitMaker: 152 posts
Armorama: 129 posts
Joined: June 06, 2006
KitMaker: 152 posts
Armorama: 129 posts
Posted: Sunday, August 19, 2007 - 02:43 PM UTC
more photo's
hogarth
Maryland, United States
Joined: June 02, 2006
KitMaker: 672 posts
Armorama: 592 posts
Joined: June 02, 2006
KitMaker: 672 posts
Armorama: 592 posts
Posted: Sunday, August 19, 2007 - 02:50 PM UTC
Quite nice. Good use of the water, nice figs.
A couple of things that jump out at me, good things, include your painting of the figs, the water, the snow, all look great. Thanks for tying down the rear stowage on the Sherman.
Some criticisms:
1. There shouldn't be hull applique armor on an M4A3 75w.
2. The backpack on the side of the jeep, is it tied on? I can' t tell. It's also a British pack and unlikely to be on an American jeep.
3. You didn't fair in the spent shell port on the Sherman turret. There's still a big seam there, but it was all part of the turret casting.
4. The tank could use a few other tweaks such as the engine hatch rests on the upper hull and raised weld seams.
5. The snow on the top run of the Sherman....to me, it looks like it drove into the water, which means at some point that top run would've been on the bottom, and therefore that snow would have been wiped clean. I suppose it could have just slid sideways though, as I've seen in videos, so it might be okay as is.
6. I don't think I've ever seen US troops with white painted helmets. I've seen them covered in white pillowcases, but not painted. I'm sure it happened, but I can't ever remember seeing pics of such.
7. The figs all look kind of shiney to me. Always tough to get them dull enough, I know from my own experience.
8. Leggings (the kneeling aiming guy) were pretty rare by this point in the war.
9. The jeep has an antenna but no radio.
10. No ammo for the .50 on the jeep, so why was that guy manning it?
That's it. Seems like a lot, I'm sure, but these are all relatively minor things, which I've learned over time b/c other people have given me plenty of feedback just like this. Hope it helps and doesn't hurt your feelings or whatever. It really is a fine piece. To be honest, had you chosen an M5A1, half of my criticisms would not be here....I just happen to be a Shermaholic.
Great work.
Rob
A couple of things that jump out at me, good things, include your painting of the figs, the water, the snow, all look great. Thanks for tying down the rear stowage on the Sherman.
Some criticisms:
1. There shouldn't be hull applique armor on an M4A3 75w.
2. The backpack on the side of the jeep, is it tied on? I can' t tell. It's also a British pack and unlikely to be on an American jeep.
3. You didn't fair in the spent shell port on the Sherman turret. There's still a big seam there, but it was all part of the turret casting.
4. The tank could use a few other tweaks such as the engine hatch rests on the upper hull and raised weld seams.
5. The snow on the top run of the Sherman....to me, it looks like it drove into the water, which means at some point that top run would've been on the bottom, and therefore that snow would have been wiped clean. I suppose it could have just slid sideways though, as I've seen in videos, so it might be okay as is.
6. I don't think I've ever seen US troops with white painted helmets. I've seen them covered in white pillowcases, but not painted. I'm sure it happened, but I can't ever remember seeing pics of such.
7. The figs all look kind of shiney to me. Always tough to get them dull enough, I know from my own experience.
8. Leggings (the kneeling aiming guy) were pretty rare by this point in the war.
9. The jeep has an antenna but no radio.
10. No ammo for the .50 on the jeep, so why was that guy manning it?
That's it. Seems like a lot, I'm sure, but these are all relatively minor things, which I've learned over time b/c other people have given me plenty of feedback just like this. Hope it helps and doesn't hurt your feelings or whatever. It really is a fine piece. To be honest, had you chosen an M5A1, half of my criticisms would not be here....I just happen to be a Shermaholic.
Great work.
Rob
gsmith
Kentucky, United States
Joined: August 11, 2007
KitMaker: 136 posts
Armorama: 117 posts
Joined: August 11, 2007
KitMaker: 136 posts
Armorama: 117 posts
Posted: Sunday, August 19, 2007 - 02:53 PM UTC
I hope you weren't offended i guess i may have been unclear, i was complimenting your use of water, and the splashes. i was saying others didn't give the splash effect where you did, i think it's great.
gary
gary
plasticman
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: June 06, 2006
KitMaker: 152 posts
Armorama: 129 posts
Joined: June 06, 2006
KitMaker: 152 posts
Armorama: 129 posts
Posted: Sunday, August 19, 2007 - 02:54 PM UTC
And some more. Enjoy. Again, sorry for the blur.
plasticman
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: June 06, 2006
KitMaker: 152 posts
Armorama: 129 posts
Joined: June 06, 2006
KitMaker: 152 posts
Armorama: 129 posts
Posted: Sunday, August 19, 2007 - 03:15 PM UTC
1. There shouldn't be hull applique armor on an M4A3 75w.
2. The backpack on the side of the jeep, is it tied on? I can' t tell. It's also a British pack and unlikely to be on an American jeep.
3. You didn't fair in the spent shell port on the Sherman turret. There's still a big seam there, but it was all part of the turret casting.
4. The tank could use a few other tweaks such as the engine hatch rests on the upper hull and raised weld seams.
5. The snow on the top run of the Sherman....to me, it looks like it drove into the water, which means at some point that top run would've been on the bottom, and therefore that snow would have been wiped clean. I suppose it could have just slid sideways though, as I've seen in videos, so it might be okay as is.
6. I don't think I've ever seen US troops with white painted helmets. I've seen them covered in white pillowcases, but not painted. I'm sure it happened, but I can't ever remember seeing pics of such.
7. The figs all look kind of shiney to me. Always tough to get them dull enough, I know from my own experience.
8. Leggings (the kneeling aiming guy) were pretty rare by this point in the war.
9. The jeep has an antenna but no radio.
10. No ammo for the .50 on the jeep, so why was that guy manning it?
Hey Rob, thanks for the comments. I'll try to answers some of your questions.
1). Your right about the armor plating. This was a mistake made by the tamiya instructions.and should of not been on there. However, glue is not very forgiving. Did not know this until it was too late.
2). The back pack is tied on. Hard to see. I dont know about the british pack. This part was an add on from my stock pile. I have never done a british model. So, I dont know how I obtained it. I thought it came from an old testor's M7 kit.
3). I built this OOB. So, some detailing was left out. Not sure if know what your saying about the turret casting seam
4).Again, OOB. No more on detailing. Just a few ammo crates and a tarp.
5). You can say that the tank "slid" A little heavy on the snow. LOL
6). I believe the troops used the paint from the white washed tanks in the field.
7). Sprayed the hell out of them with dullcote. No luck. Also used flash on the pics.
8).Was not aware of the leggings period.
9). The jeep came with no radio. OOB. Again, still working on this.
10). Yes, again still working on the jeep. Machine gun not very detailed. But I need to fix an ammo box to it.
2. The backpack on the side of the jeep, is it tied on? I can' t tell. It's also a British pack and unlikely to be on an American jeep.
3. You didn't fair in the spent shell port on the Sherman turret. There's still a big seam there, but it was all part of the turret casting.
4. The tank could use a few other tweaks such as the engine hatch rests on the upper hull and raised weld seams.
5. The snow on the top run of the Sherman....to me, it looks like it drove into the water, which means at some point that top run would've been on the bottom, and therefore that snow would have been wiped clean. I suppose it could have just slid sideways though, as I've seen in videos, so it might be okay as is.
6. I don't think I've ever seen US troops with white painted helmets. I've seen them covered in white pillowcases, but not painted. I'm sure it happened, but I can't ever remember seeing pics of such.
7. The figs all look kind of shiney to me. Always tough to get them dull enough, I know from my own experience.
8. Leggings (the kneeling aiming guy) were pretty rare by this point in the war.
9. The jeep has an antenna but no radio.
10. No ammo for the .50 on the jeep, so why was that guy manning it?
Hey Rob, thanks for the comments. I'll try to answers some of your questions.
1). Your right about the armor plating. This was a mistake made by the tamiya instructions.and should of not been on there. However, glue is not very forgiving. Did not know this until it was too late.
2). The back pack is tied on. Hard to see. I dont know about the british pack. This part was an add on from my stock pile. I have never done a british model. So, I dont know how I obtained it. I thought it came from an old testor's M7 kit.
3). I built this OOB. So, some detailing was left out. Not sure if know what your saying about the turret casting seam
4).Again, OOB. No more on detailing. Just a few ammo crates and a tarp.
5). You can say that the tank "slid" A little heavy on the snow. LOL
6). I believe the troops used the paint from the white washed tanks in the field.
7). Sprayed the hell out of them with dullcote. No luck. Also used flash on the pics.
8).Was not aware of the leggings period.
9). The jeep came with no radio. OOB. Again, still working on this.
10). Yes, again still working on the jeep. Machine gun not very detailed. But I need to fix an ammo box to it.
DCJnr123
Arizona, United States
Joined: May 07, 2007
KitMaker: 51 posts
Armorama: 49 posts
Joined: May 07, 2007
KitMaker: 51 posts
Armorama: 49 posts
Posted: Sunday, August 19, 2007 - 04:04 PM UTC
It was pretty darn cold then, wouldnt the river have been frozen over? I love the Diorama but thats for sure a thought? great work
David
David
plasticman
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: June 06, 2006
KitMaker: 152 posts
Armorama: 129 posts
Joined: June 06, 2006
KitMaker: 152 posts
Armorama: 129 posts
Posted: Sunday, August 19, 2007 - 04:35 PM UTC
Hi David. Its a brooke or creak. I have seen photos with snow and a running stream. I did think of that before I put in the water LOL Thanks!
roudeleiw
Luxembourg
Joined: January 19, 2004
KitMaker: 2,406 posts
Armorama: 2,224 posts
Joined: January 19, 2004
KitMaker: 2,406 posts
Armorama: 2,224 posts
Posted: Sunday, August 19, 2007 - 06:58 PM UTC
very cool effort, you showed already a great courage to model snow and water in one dio.
The result is convincing for the eye. The scene is well done.
I think what you did is having fun with dio making and not caring to much with accurate details (OOB) . And that is sometimes the thing to do.
Good job
Cheers
Claude
The result is convincing for the eye. The scene is well done.
I think what you did is having fun with dio making and not caring to much with accurate details (OOB) . And that is sometimes the thing to do.
Good job
Cheers
Claude
HONEYCUT
Victoria, Australia
Joined: May 07, 2003
KitMaker: 4,002 posts
Armorama: 2,947 posts
Joined: May 07, 2003
KitMaker: 4,002 posts
Armorama: 2,947 posts
Posted: Sunday, August 19, 2007 - 08:59 PM UTC
Gday Sean
I love the fact you have attempted this, especially a full-action, under-fire scene...
I have something similar planned for a Sherman of mine in trouble, (but will be bogged or mined) and at one stage was looking at purchasing the Verlinden bailing out figure sets. Did these go together well?
Bravo on the resin water. It is quite effective. What did you use to 'wall' it in for the pouring stage?
The stowage is effective, and in light of all the other feedback I hope it encourages you to try another Sherman but with the tweaks attempted
Good stuff
Brad
I love the fact you have attempted this, especially a full-action, under-fire scene...
I have something similar planned for a Sherman of mine in trouble, (but will be bogged or mined) and at one stage was looking at purchasing the Verlinden bailing out figure sets. Did these go together well?
Bravo on the resin water. It is quite effective. What did you use to 'wall' it in for the pouring stage?
The stowage is effective, and in light of all the other feedback I hope it encourages you to try another Sherman but with the tweaks attempted
Good stuff
Brad
plasticman
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: June 06, 2006
KitMaker: 152 posts
Armorama: 129 posts
Joined: June 06, 2006
KitMaker: 152 posts
Armorama: 129 posts
Posted: Monday, August 20, 2007 - 01:49 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Gday Sean
I love the fact you have attempted this, especially a full-action, under-fire scene...
I have something similar planned for a Sherman of mine in trouble, (but will be bogged or mined) and at one stage was looking at purchasing the Verlinden bailing out figure sets. Did these go together well?
Bravo on the resin water. It is quite effective. What did you use to 'wall' it in for the pouring stage?
The stowage is effective, and in light of all the other feedback I hope it encourages you to try another Sherman but with the tweaks attempted
Good stuff
Brad
Gday Brad!
All of the verlinden figures went together great. No fit problems. Very detailed.
To dam up the water, I used thin sheets of plastic, cut them in strips and glued them on the sides. There were some small gaps, so I used putty to seal it. Thanks for the positive comments. Take it easy!
plasticman
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: June 06, 2006
KitMaker: 152 posts
Armorama: 129 posts
Joined: June 06, 2006
KitMaker: 152 posts
Armorama: 129 posts
Posted: Monday, August 20, 2007 - 01:53 AM UTC
Quoted Text
very cool effort, you showed already a great courage to model snow and water in one dio.
The result is convincing for the eye. The scene is well done.
I think what you did is having fun with dio making and not caring to much with accurate details (OOB) . And that is sometimes the thing to do.
Good job
Cheers
Claude
Thanks for the kind comments Claude. It is nice to build something OOB. I will continue to build OOB. And continue to send photos. Cheers!
jba
Rhone, France
Joined: November 04, 2005
KitMaker: 1,845 posts
Armorama: 777 posts
Joined: November 04, 2005
KitMaker: 1,845 posts
Armorama: 777 posts
Posted: Monday, August 20, 2007 - 01:59 AM UTC
Hi Sean, just a quick word (no time to read the other posts, sorry if i am redundant!) to say i quite like your dio, the wide angle of the scene is perfect to show a tensed situation, and I like the scattering of the different elements throughout the scene; the only thing that i would add would be a fair amount of matt varnish spray over the figs
there's really a feeling of movement with the water and the 2 guys running, they are a really nice touch for a first plan, they're kinda out of the scene, but it really works well!
there's really a feeling of movement with the water and the 2 guys running, they are a really nice touch for a first plan, they're kinda out of the scene, but it really works well!
JimF
Texas, United States
Joined: July 05, 2002
KitMaker: 717 posts
Armorama: 621 posts
Joined: July 05, 2002
KitMaker: 717 posts
Armorama: 621 posts
Posted: Monday, August 20, 2007 - 02:17 AM UTC
Very impressive dio. Something you might try to take the shine down on the figures would be to use a very dilute (1 part paint, 9 parts thinner) earth tone mixture and mist it on the scene, with a bit more on the figures than the snow or water.
plasticman
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: June 06, 2006
KitMaker: 152 posts
Armorama: 129 posts
Joined: June 06, 2006
KitMaker: 152 posts
Armorama: 129 posts
Posted: Monday, August 20, 2007 - 06:14 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Hi Sean, just a quick word (no time to read the other posts, sorry if i am redundant!) to say i quite like your dio, the wide angle of the scene is perfect to show a tensed situation, and I like the scattering of the different elements throughout the scene; the only thing that i would add would be a fair amount of matt varnish spray over the figs
there's really a feeling of movement with the water and the 2 guys running, they are a really nice touch for a first plan, they're kinda out of the scene, but it really works well!
Thanks. I do not know why the figs are shiny. I tried dullcote and it seems that it is not working. Thanks for the tip.
plasticman
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: June 06, 2006
KitMaker: 152 posts
Armorama: 129 posts
Joined: June 06, 2006
KitMaker: 152 posts
Armorama: 129 posts
Posted: Monday, August 20, 2007 - 06:16 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Very impressive dio. Something you might try to take the shine down on the figures would be to use a very dilute (1 part paint, 9 parts thinner) earth tone mixture and mist it on the scene, with a bit more on the figures than the snow or water.
Hi Jim, thanks for the feedback. The figs are shiny, but tried the dullcote with no luck. I will try your method on the next dio. Thanks again.
210cav
Virginia, United States
Joined: February 05, 2002
KitMaker: 6,149 posts
Armorama: 4,573 posts
Joined: February 05, 2002
KitMaker: 6,149 posts
Armorama: 4,573 posts
Posted: Monday, August 20, 2007 - 07:59 AM UTC
Sean-- what did you use to create the water. Very nice woork.
DJ
DJ
rotATOR
California, United States
Joined: November 16, 2006
KitMaker: 223 posts
Armorama: 167 posts
Joined: November 16, 2006
KitMaker: 223 posts
Armorama: 167 posts
Posted: Monday, August 20, 2007 - 09:42 AM UTC
what I like most about your project is the fact that you show "action" and thats a big plus...keep up the good work rR