_GOTOBOTTOM
Armor/AFV: 48th Scale
1/48 scale discussion group hosted by Rob Gronovius
Hosted by Darren Baker
My little sherman
mac_fixer
Visit this Community
England - West Midlands, United Kingdom
Joined: April 06, 2004
KitMaker: 13 posts
Armorama: 12 posts
Posted: Thursday, August 30, 2007 - 09:10 AM UTC
Here is my rendition of Tamiya's 1/48th Sherman. Like my Tiger this has taken an absolute age to complete, working shifts - young family - etc. All photos taken with a Nikon D80 18-70mm lens plus 2+,4+ macro filters -

General Shots of the completed diorama




Over head Close Ups





Details





Smile for the folks back home !

exer
Visit this Community
Dublin, Ireland
Joined: November 27, 2004
KitMaker: 6,048 posts
Armorama: 4,619 posts
Posted: Thursday, August 30, 2007 - 09:27 AM UTC
Really good work Steve. Is the stowage home made?
mac_fixer
Visit this Community
England - West Midlands, United Kingdom
Joined: April 06, 2004
KitMaker: 13 posts
Armorama: 12 posts
Posted: Thursday, August 30, 2007 - 09:53 AM UTC
Cheers !. The stowage is from the Verlinden set.
orange_3D
Visit this Community
British Columbia, Canada
Joined: July 28, 2005
KitMaker: 602 posts
Armorama: 469 posts
Posted: Thursday, August 30, 2007 - 02:23 PM UTC
cool stuff

a little bit off topic: i was planning to get the D80 but I am not sure. Looking at your photos, I think it would be nicer if you can get more depth of field - in the photo where you are looking at the shermies butt, the electric pole is out of focus - was this intentional?

mac_fixer
Visit this Community
England - West Midlands, United Kingdom
Joined: April 06, 2004
KitMaker: 13 posts
Armorama: 12 posts
Posted: Thursday, August 30, 2007 - 06:26 PM UTC
D80 is a brilliant camera and takes good photos - have a look at my website if you want - www.brodiephotography.co.uk, yeah - the pole is out of focus - will have to reshoot it !!. The reason there is not much depth of field is due to the 'macro' filters plus my first time using them.
sweaver
Visit this Community
Kentucky, United States
Joined: April 19, 2007
KitMaker: 759 posts
Armorama: 410 posts
Posted: Thursday, August 30, 2007 - 10:02 PM UTC
Put it in Aperture Priority mode. That lets you adjust the aperture size. The bigger the number, the smaller the aperture and the longer the depth of field.

HTH
jowady
Joined: June 12, 2006
KitMaker: 1,027 posts
Armorama: 683 posts
Posted: Saturday, September 01, 2007 - 08:16 AM UTC

Quoted Text

Put it in Aperture Priority mode. That lets you adjust the aperture size. The bigger the number, the smaller the aperture and the longer the depth of field.

HTH



However, depth of field narrows dramatically with macro photography. Given the image size and resolution with the D80, a better option might be to back off a little and then crop the image.

John
Vermont6
Visit this Community
New York, United States
Joined: July 16, 2006
KitMaker: 155 posts
Armorama: 127 posts
Posted: Saturday, September 01, 2007 - 09:41 AM UTC
Great kit, nice details. Can't wait to see the Tiger
AlanL
Visit this Community
England - East Anglia, United Kingdom
Joined: August 12, 2005
KitMaker: 14,499 posts
Armorama: 11,675 posts
Posted: Saturday, September 01, 2007 - 12:34 PM UTC
Hi Steve,

Nice work on the Sherman.

Cheers

Al
trickymissfit
Joined: October 03, 2007
KitMaker: 1,388 posts
Armorama: 1,357 posts
Posted: Saturday, October 20, 2007 - 05:53 AM UTC

Quoted Text

cool stuff

a little bit off topic: i was planning to get the D80 but I am not sure. Looking at your photos, I think it would be nicer if you can get more depth of field - in the photo where you are looking at the shermies butt, the electric pole is out of focus - was this intentional?




I do quite a lot of macro photography (mostly bugs and flowers), and ran into a similar problem. After a discussion with my mentor he told me that using the 105mm lense I was using would limit the depth of field greatly, and said that what I needed was something in the 300mm range. I used a Sima 105mm EX lense on a Fuji S3 pro (they are made off a Nikon body, but use their own electronics and color sensors). I shoot nothing but hard lined JPEG at 12meg, and have since learned to back off a bit and just blow the pictures up to where I want them. I might add here that the depth of field for a 105mm lense in macro is something close to 3/4" if not a little less.
Your pictures were fine, and actually pretty good. A ring light would have helped a bunch, but a series of lights from the side would have been even better. The trick with the lighting from the side is to keep it soft.
gary
jowady
Joined: June 12, 2006
KitMaker: 1,027 posts
Armorama: 683 posts
Posted: Saturday, October 20, 2007 - 08:46 AM UTC

Quoted Text


Quoted Text

cool





Your pictures were fine, and actually pretty good. A ring light would have helped a bunch, but a series of lights from the side would have been even better. The trick with the lighting from the side is to keep it soft.
gary



A ring light will give you even, but fairly flat illumination. Take the lights from the side into a reflector, you'll get a large, soft illumination without the flatness of a ring. this is why portrait photographers use umbrellas or softboxes. Lighting is really the key to photography.

John
INDIA11A
Visit this Community
Ontario, Canada
Joined: January 09, 2005
KitMaker: 577 posts
Armorama: 446 posts
Posted: Saturday, October 20, 2007 - 08:58 AM UTC
Very nicely done Sherman. Everything is spot on. Excellent work.

Doug
 _GOTOTOP