Every time someone posts a pic of their Tamiya M4 they are told that Tamiya made a mistake and the return rollers should have horizontal brackets. These pics of an M4 were posted by Dan Fong over on ML and seem to show an M4 -look at the aircleaners and applique armour - with upswept return rollers. I've blown the photo up in photoshop and the return rollers look upswept to me any else care to comment?
Hosted by Darren Baker
Has this M4 upswept return rollers ?(Photo)
exer
Dublin, Ireland
Joined: November 27, 2004
KitMaker: 6,048 posts
Armorama: 4,619 posts
Joined: November 27, 2004
KitMaker: 6,048 posts
Armorama: 4,619 posts
Posted: Friday, September 07, 2007 - 11:53 PM UTC
Grumpyoldman
Consigliere
Florida, United States
Joined: October 17, 2003
KitMaker: 15,338 posts
Armorama: 7,297 posts
Joined: October 17, 2003
KitMaker: 15,338 posts
Armorama: 7,297 posts
Posted: Saturday, September 08, 2007 - 12:02 AM UTC
To my old eyes, they look upswept.
HONEYCUT
Victoria, Australia
Joined: May 07, 2003
KitMaker: 4,002 posts
Armorama: 2,947 posts
Joined: May 07, 2003
KitMaker: 4,002 posts
Armorama: 2,947 posts
Posted: Saturday, September 08, 2007 - 12:48 AM UTC
Gday Pat
Nope I reckon they're straight return roller arms with pillow blocks.
I have a closer shot of the second pic, and it can be seen that the reinforced top edge from the roller back to the bogie housing looks definitively horizontal, whereas if they were the upswept style you'd see the same top edge noticeably drop downwards towards the bogie housing. I reckon the shadows play a big part in the confusion? [Even the straight arms sit a little higher than flush with the top of the bogie housing, adding another shadow...]
My opinion only!
Brad
Nope I reckon they're straight return roller arms with pillow blocks.
I have a closer shot of the second pic, and it can be seen that the reinforced top edge from the roller back to the bogie housing looks definitively horizontal, whereas if they were the upswept style you'd see the same top edge noticeably drop downwards towards the bogie housing. I reckon the shadows play a big part in the confusion? [Even the straight arms sit a little higher than flush with the top of the bogie housing, adding another shadow...]
My opinion only!
Brad
Grumpyoldman
Consigliere
Florida, United States
Joined: October 17, 2003
KitMaker: 15,338 posts
Armorama: 7,297 posts
Joined: October 17, 2003
KitMaker: 15,338 posts
Armorama: 7,297 posts
Posted: Saturday, September 08, 2007 - 02:15 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Nope I reckon they're straight return roller arms with pillow block
Yep Brad, after downloading and greatly enlarging the bogie, I now think they are straight with pillow blocks.
I like your new Avatar.
HONEYCUT
Victoria, Australia
Joined: May 07, 2003
KitMaker: 4,002 posts
Armorama: 2,947 posts
Joined: May 07, 2003
KitMaker: 4,002 posts
Armorama: 2,947 posts
Posted: Saturday, September 08, 2007 - 03:02 AM UTC
This potentially would be the biggest revelation in Sherman history (ok, one of 'em) to be proven as upswept, so I guess I worked on the odds to begin with
hehe It's funny how used you get to people's postings by their avatar alone, but after a few years a change is as good as a holiday
Plus Qvack is from one of my favourite childhood comicstrips...
Quoted Text
I like your new Avatar.
hehe It's funny how used you get to people's postings by their avatar alone, but after a few years a change is as good as a holiday
Plus Qvack is from one of my favourite childhood comicstrips...
exer
Dublin, Ireland
Joined: November 27, 2004
KitMaker: 6,048 posts
Armorama: 4,619 posts
Joined: November 27, 2004
KitMaker: 6,048 posts
Armorama: 4,619 posts
Posted: Saturday, September 08, 2007 - 04:48 AM UTC
Okay I give in
GeraldOwens
Florida, United States
Joined: March 30, 2006
KitMaker: 3,736 posts
Armorama: 3,697 posts
Joined: March 30, 2006
KitMaker: 3,736 posts
Armorama: 3,697 posts
Posted: Saturday, September 08, 2007 - 10:30 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Every time someone posts a pic of their Tamiya M4 they are told that Tamiya made a mistake and the return rollers should have horizontal brackets. These pics of an M4 were posted by Dan Fong over on ML and seem to show an M4 -look at the aircleaners and applique armour - with upswept return rollers. I've blown the photo up in photoshop and the return rollers look upswept to me any else care to comment?
I would say it's inconclusive. The upswept brackets became available in August 1943, but most factories had back stock of the earlier version to use up, so they do not become common until 1944. Some Chrysler composite hull M4's produced in late 1943 had them, so it's not unreasonable that they may have turned up at other assembly plants in time for some 56-degree hulls to receive them. Alternatively, a 1942 hull with the M3 style bogies might have received a set during rebuilding.
HONEYCUT
Victoria, Australia
Joined: May 07, 2003
KitMaker: 4,002 posts
Armorama: 2,947 posts
Joined: May 07, 2003
KitMaker: 4,002 posts
Armorama: 2,947 posts
Posted: Saturday, September 08, 2007 - 11:19 AM UTC
Thanks for the info Gerald but I did some tweaking on my photo and with this pic I reckon the straight arm with pillow block is what has been fitted...
Brad
ericadeane
Michigan, United States
Joined: October 28, 2002
KitMaker: 4,021 posts
Armorama: 3,947 posts
Joined: October 28, 2002
KitMaker: 4,021 posts
Armorama: 3,947 posts
Posted: Saturday, September 08, 2007 - 11:25 AM UTC
Bradley: Great work. It looks like Dan Fong over on ML concluded the same thing. Look at his close up of the VVS
http://www.network54.com/Forum/47208/thread/1189251615/M4+with+upswept+return+rollers-
http://www.network54.com/Forum/47208/thread/1189251615/M4+with+upswept+return+rollers-
HONEYCUT
Victoria, Australia
Joined: May 07, 2003
KitMaker: 4,002 posts
Armorama: 2,947 posts
Joined: May 07, 2003
KitMaker: 4,002 posts
Armorama: 2,947 posts
Posted: Sunday, September 09, 2007 - 01:48 AM UTC
Ta Roy
I reckon the shading on the slight sloped top of the bogie assembly makes it appear as though the arm sits higher than in reality...
Brad
I reckon the shading on the slight sloped top of the bogie assembly makes it appear as though the arm sits higher than in reality...
Brad