The subject of this review is a recent book from the Polish publisher Progres Model Centrum within their Armor Photogallery series. M4A2 Sherman Part 2: 76 mm Gun Tank, is an excellent resource for anyone contemplating working on the Academy or DML kits in 1/35th scale. The full review can be seen:
M4A2 Sherman Part 2: 76 mm Gun Tank
If you have comments or questions please post them here.
Thanks!
Armor/AFV
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
Hosted by Darren Baker, Mario Matijasic
REVIEW
M4A2 Sherman (76mm) Part 2jimbrae
Provincia de Lugo, Spain / Espaņa
Joined: April 23, 2003
KitMaker: 12,927 posts
Armorama: 9,486 posts
Joined: April 23, 2003
KitMaker: 12,927 posts
Armorama: 9,486 posts
Posted: Wednesday, September 12, 2007 - 11:40 PM UTC
toadman1
Vendor
California, United States
Joined: July 20, 2004
KitMaker: 1,141 posts
Armorama: 950 posts
Joined: July 20, 2004
KitMaker: 1,141 posts
Armorama: 950 posts
Posted: Thursday, September 13, 2007 - 04:27 AM UTC
Jim,
Thanks for posting the review.
While I agree to a certain extent, the problem is availability of suitable subject vehicles. There are very few surviving M4A2(76) around. AFAIK, their aren't any in the U.S. as their turrets were removed post-war and retrofitted to M4A3(75) hulls. M4A2(76)HVSS are much more common and several, like the subject, are in very good shape.
Like you said, the differences are minimal, being primarily confined to the suspension, fenders, and grooves on the lower hull for the suspension.
Chris "toadman" Hughes
Toadman's Tank Pictures
Thanks for posting the review.
Quoted Text
Finally, in 'Gripes 'r Us', a few comments about the subject. It would, have been, in my opinion, to have concentrated on the M4a2 with VVSS rather than HVSS. This for me would have increased its appeal. Not that we're short of good HVSS suspension but with two widely available kits of the M4a2 (76) VVSS it might have increased sales.
While I agree to a certain extent, the problem is availability of suitable subject vehicles. There are very few surviving M4A2(76) around. AFAIK, their aren't any in the U.S. as their turrets were removed post-war and retrofitted to M4A3(75) hulls. M4A2(76)HVSS are much more common and several, like the subject, are in very good shape.
Quoted Text
However, I will counter that argument by saying that (with the exception of the suspension) the two vehicles have very few differences and the serious Shermanholic will find plenty to work with.
Like you said, the differences are minimal, being primarily confined to the suspension, fenders, and grooves on the lower hull for the suspension.
Chris "toadman" Hughes
Toadman's Tank Pictures
exer
Dublin, Ireland
Joined: November 27, 2004
KitMaker: 6,048 posts
Armorama: 4,619 posts
Joined: November 27, 2004
KitMaker: 6,048 posts
Armorama: 4,619 posts
Posted: Friday, September 28, 2007 - 03:47 AM UTC
My copy just arrived (from Jadar Hobbies) Great reference and wartime photos - Time to get my stalled Academy M4A2 project going again.