Has anyone seen another picture of the CROWS II RWS besides this one?
http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/images/ORD_RWS_CROWS_Kongsberg_lg.jpg
This is what most likely will be used with the TUSK / TUSK II add-on for the M1A2. It will replace the commander's M2HB and be placed just in frount of his cuppola and just behind the gunner's sight. There is also a possiblility of this replacing the Loader's M240 as well at some point.
Thank you.
Hosted by Darren Baker
CROWS II RWS
GaryGore
Ontario, Canada
Joined: November 05, 2006
KitMaker: 384 posts
Armorama: 338 posts
Joined: November 05, 2006
KitMaker: 384 posts
Armorama: 338 posts
Posted: Thursday, March 13, 2008 - 07:30 AM UTC
sadodd
Nebraska, United States
Joined: December 29, 2007
KitMaker: 270 posts
Armorama: 269 posts
Joined: December 29, 2007
KitMaker: 270 posts
Armorama: 269 posts
Posted: Thursday, March 13, 2008 - 08:08 AM UTC
GaryGore,
Check out this site
http://www.israeli-weapons.com/weapons/small_arms/rcws/RCWS.html
Hope this helps some.
Check out this site
http://www.israeli-weapons.com/weapons/small_arms/rcws/RCWS.html
Hope this helps some.
GaryGore
Ontario, Canada
Joined: November 05, 2006
KitMaker: 384 posts
Armorama: 338 posts
Joined: November 05, 2006
KitMaker: 384 posts
Armorama: 338 posts
Posted: Thursday, March 13, 2008 - 10:04 AM UTC
They help, but those are different than the CROWS II. It will help me guess on what the other side may look like.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Quoted Text
GaryGore,
Check out this site
http://www.israeli-weapons.com/weapons/small_arms/rcws/RCWS.html
Hope this helps some.
Boggie
Newfoundland, Canada
Joined: December 08, 2005
KitMaker: 1,370 posts
Armorama: 1,331 posts
Joined: December 08, 2005
KitMaker: 1,370 posts
Armorama: 1,331 posts
Posted: Friday, March 14, 2008 - 03:34 AM UTC
GaryGore
Ontario, Canada
Joined: November 05, 2006
KitMaker: 384 posts
Armorama: 338 posts
Joined: November 05, 2006
KitMaker: 384 posts
Armorama: 338 posts
Posted: Friday, March 14, 2008 - 06:45 AM UTC
Thank you, I hadn't thought of these parts, but do show some interesting details that I havn't seen before.
GaryGore
Ontario, Canada
Joined: November 05, 2006
KitMaker: 384 posts
Armorama: 338 posts
Joined: November 05, 2006
KitMaker: 384 posts
Armorama: 338 posts
Posted: Friday, March 14, 2008 - 01:54 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Those are not the same mount as in the first "link". What your calling the "CROWS II" is basicly the same RWS as on the Stryker, but with a different feed setup. The other pics are of a different RWS.
Thank you. The first link does sort of look like the new M151E2 RWS so I guess I'll start there with what I need to build for the CROWS II.
Ellevenbravo
Massachusetts, United States
Joined: April 08, 2007
KitMaker: 269 posts
Armorama: 261 posts
Joined: April 08, 2007
KitMaker: 269 posts
Armorama: 261 posts
Posted: Saturday, March 15, 2008 - 12:25 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Has anyone seen another picture of the CROWS II RWS besides this one?
http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/images/ORD_RWS_CROWS_Kongsberg_lg.jpg
This is what most likely will be used with the TUSK / TUSK II add-on for the M1A2. It will replace the commander's M2HB and be placed just in frount of his cuppola and just behind the gunner's sight. There is also a possiblility of this replacing the Loader's M240 as well at some point.
Thank you.
Last I heard, the CROWS was deleted from the M-1 TUSK program. Are you looking at some outdated info or have they decided to include this after all?
Regards,
John
Boggie
Newfoundland, Canada
Joined: December 08, 2005
KitMaker: 1,370 posts
Armorama: 1,331 posts
Joined: December 08, 2005
KitMaker: 1,370 posts
Armorama: 1,331 posts
Posted: Saturday, March 15, 2008 - 06:23 AM UTC
Tankleader
Virginia, United States
Joined: April 29, 2003
KitMaker: 718 posts
Armorama: 684 posts
Joined: April 29, 2003
KitMaker: 718 posts
Armorama: 684 posts
Posted: Saturday, March 15, 2008 - 06:59 AM UTC
Looks Cool,
But me being a simpleton don't really like the idea of feed chutes because you are complicating the loading procedure and even with bigger ammo bins, someone is still going to have to expose themselves to service the bin. God forbid that you have a jam in the feedchute of gun. So much for the kiss Keep it Simple Stupid methology.
Tanks
Andy
But me being a simpleton don't really like the idea of feed chutes because you are complicating the loading procedure and even with bigger ammo bins, someone is still going to have to expose themselves to service the bin. God forbid that you have a jam in the feedchute of gun. So much for the kiss Keep it Simple Stupid methology.
Tanks
Andy