Starting a new small 1/35 dio
The dio will show a German flamethrower halftrack and some infantry slowly advancing across a field towards an unshown town controlled by guerillas
Edited it to make the markings easier to see.
The black thing’ll be the halftrack. The markings a little oversized.
Blue X will be a kneeling sniper leaning the rifle against a small tree or post as he watches the town.
Red and Green Xs will be men slowly walking along with the halftrack with weapons at the ready.
The corner with the yellow thing I’m not sure about. I was thinking of making it the corner of a small shed with an armed guerilla hiding in it but I’m not sure how well that would fit into the scene.
What do you guys think?
Any Comments, Ideas, or Suggestions on the layout are welcome.
Hosted by Darren Baker
Laying out a new dio
redneck
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: June 06, 2005
KitMaker: 1,602 posts
Armorama: 384 posts
Joined: June 06, 2005
KitMaker: 1,602 posts
Armorama: 384 posts
Posted: Thursday, March 20, 2008 - 11:18 AM UTC
sadodd
Nebraska, United States
Joined: December 29, 2007
KitMaker: 270 posts
Armorama: 269 posts
Joined: December 29, 2007
KitMaker: 270 posts
Armorama: 269 posts
Posted: Thursday, March 20, 2008 - 11:51 AM UTC
Jacob,
Not a bad layout. A point to consider though, snipers generally didn't expose themselves for fear of getting hit by opposition snipers, maybe a couple of lower rank officers with field glasses over watching the town or village by the trees or shrubs and a sniper in the corner of the building or shed where he could get a good shot on some unsuspecting guerrillas would be better.
Just my opinion.
Not a bad layout. A point to consider though, snipers generally didn't expose themselves for fear of getting hit by opposition snipers, maybe a couple of lower rank officers with field glasses over watching the town or village by the trees or shrubs and a sniper in the corner of the building or shed where he could get a good shot on some unsuspecting guerrillas would be better.
Just my opinion.
slodder
North Carolina, United States
Joined: February 22, 2002
KitMaker: 11,718 posts
Armorama: 7,138 posts
Joined: February 22, 2002
KitMaker: 11,718 posts
Armorama: 7,138 posts
Posted: Thursday, March 20, 2008 - 02:38 PM UTC
One more thing to consider is the direction of the half track. Don't put the walking figures in front of the flame canons. When they go off it might ruin someones day
redneck
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: June 06, 2005
KitMaker: 1,602 posts
Armorama: 384 posts
Joined: June 06, 2005
KitMaker: 1,602 posts
Armorama: 384 posts
Posted: Friday, March 21, 2008 - 02:22 AM UTC
Thanks Guys.
Steve that’s a good point. I’ll have to see what I can come up with.
Scott I’ll be sure to keep that in mind.
Steve that’s a good point. I’ll have to see what I can come up with.
Scott I’ll be sure to keep that in mind.
Neo
North Carolina, United States
Joined: January 20, 2005
KitMaker: 916 posts
Armorama: 758 posts
Joined: January 20, 2005
KitMaker: 916 posts
Armorama: 758 posts
Posted: Friday, March 21, 2008 - 02:54 AM UTC
Quoted Text
One more thing to consider is the direction of the half track. Don't put the walking figures in front of the flame canons. When they go off it might ruin someones day
Actually, dismounted troops often need to advance past an armed vehicle to recon an area, so that scenario is very plausible. Sniper prob. not cause snipers like to hide. I like Steve's idea about the sniper at the shed - good balance to the dio. layout. I would keep the other troops in the front.
Spoken like Ed McMahon: You are correct Sir !
Blue on Blue will deff. ruin everybody's day...
AJLaFleche
Massachusetts, United States
Joined: May 05, 2002
KitMaker: 8,074 posts
Armorama: 3,293 posts
Joined: May 05, 2002
KitMaker: 8,074 posts
Armorama: 3,293 posts
Posted: Friday, March 21, 2008 - 03:28 AM UTC
On the sniper...if he's using his scope to, well, scope out the village, it will cause a story line problem because it will look like he has a target and the other troops will be exposed as targets to HIS target. You always want to have to provide as little explanation to your scene as possible.