_GOTOBOTTOM
Armor/AFV: Allied - WWII
Armor and ground forces of the Allied forces during World War II.
Hosted by Darren Baker
AFV Vs. Academy, M-10 & M-36
woodstock74
Visit this Community
North Carolina, United States
Joined: December 28, 2002
KitMaker: 1,189 posts
Armorama: 692 posts
Posted: Sunday, March 30, 2008 - 04:45 PM UTC
I've read the reviews of each kit individually though didn't see any that compared either AFVs and Academy's M-10 or M-36 kits. Anyone here have a definitive opinion on AFV's M-10 and M-36 vs. Academy's M-10 & M-36?
jimbrae
Visit this Community
Provincia de Lugo, Spain / Espaņa
Joined: April 23, 2003
KitMaker: 12,927 posts
Armorama: 9,486 posts
Posted: Sunday, March 30, 2008 - 08:27 PM UTC
I won't comment on the M36s (although i've a sneaking suspicion the same comment applies) but certainly, in the case of the M10, the AFV Club kit wins hands-down. The finesse of detail, accuracy (although with a handful of issues) makes, IMO, the AFV Club one the winner...
CDK
Visit this Community
Massachusetts, United States
Joined: September 24, 2006
KitMaker: 358 posts
Armorama: 339 posts
Posted: Monday, March 31, 2008 - 04:06 AM UTC
Mike,

I'm a huge AFV fan and not a big fan of Academy but having said that, the Academy M36 is the better option from an accuracy standpoint.

AFV M36 @ Perth

Academy M36 @ Perth

Both companies M10 kits have received fairly positive reviews, however, I would personally go with the AFV no questions asked.
marcb
Visit this Community
Overijssel, Netherlands
Joined: March 25, 2006
KitMaker: 1,244 posts
Armorama: 1,226 posts
Posted: Monday, March 31, 2008 - 04:20 AM UTC
For the M-10, I'd go with the AFV Club M-10 duckbill, for the M-36 ditto, just change the engine deck. See the Perth review.
Basicaly the hull shapes and turret size are more accurate in the AFV Club than in the Academy one.
CDK
Visit this Community
Massachusetts, United States
Joined: September 24, 2006
KitMaker: 358 posts
Armorama: 339 posts
Posted: Monday, March 31, 2008 - 04:50 AM UTC
Sorry Marc,

but it's more than just the engine deck. The rear hull plate, exhaust and louvered deflectors, central hatch panel and a few other smaller nit picks as well.

Like you said, see the Perth review.

Which I did link to.

malcolm
Visit this Community
England - North East, United Kingdom
Joined: September 24, 2007
KitMaker: 312 posts
Armorama: 278 posts
Posted: Monday, March 31, 2008 - 06:20 AM UTC

go for the AFV club offering, the detail is sharper, and the plastic is a bit better quality

malc.
GeraldOwens
Visit this Community
Florida, United States
Joined: March 30, 2006
KitMaker: 3,736 posts
Armorama: 3,697 posts
Posted: Monday, March 31, 2008 - 11:46 AM UTC
The early M10's are a bit of a wash--the Academy turret is too narrow and the AFV Club turret too wide, so I guess it comes down to which bothers you more. AFV Club seems to have a better grasp of the general shapes of the M10/36 hull, but they didn't do the gasoline version, so you cannot build an accurate M36 out of the box. AFV Club's suspension is also chunkier with larger wheels than other kits. Reportedly the late "duckbill" M10 turrets are better done.
The Academy M36 kit includes more options including three gun tubes to choose from and an optional armored roof and optional postwar front plate with machine gun mount (apparently added for East Asian armies receiving US aid).
Steve Zaloga's book on Modelling US Tank Destroyers, published by Osprey, is a good resource on getting the most out of the available kits. It's available from Amazon.com.
 _GOTOTOP