Not much in the way of text but a LOT of images of AFV Club's next Stryker in 1/35th scale - AF35128 - Stryker MGS. The photo.report can be seen:
Link to Item
If you have comments or questions please post them here.
Thanks!
Armor/AFV
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
Hosted by Darren Baker, Mario Matijasic
NEWS
Photo Report: AFV Club Stryker MGSjimbrae
Provincia de Lugo, Spain / Espaņa
Joined: April 23, 2003
KitMaker: 12,927 posts
Armorama: 9,486 posts
Joined: April 23, 2003
KitMaker: 12,927 posts
Armorama: 9,486 posts
Posted: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 - 10:31 PM UTC
Posted: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 - 10:36 PM UTC
now that looks like an interesting one to build, looks very "what If"
cheers
keith
cheers
keith
nitrocomplex
APO, United States
Joined: December 06, 2007
KitMaker: 349 posts
Armorama: 202 posts
Joined: December 06, 2007
KitMaker: 349 posts
Armorama: 202 posts
Posted: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 - 11:01 PM UTC
That is farking sweet i can not wait to get one or two them
Tankleader
Virginia, United States
Joined: April 29, 2003
KitMaker: 718 posts
Armorama: 684 posts
Joined: April 29, 2003
KitMaker: 718 posts
Armorama: 684 posts
Posted: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 - 12:25 AM UTC
Yeah, there goes some more $$$ to the plastic wars. Can't wait, I've bee surfing all of the online stores looking to get in on the pre-orders.
Tanks
Andy
Tanks
Andy
Hisham
Al Qahirah, Egypt / لعربية
Joined: July 23, 2004
KitMaker: 6,856 posts
Armorama: 6,363 posts
Joined: July 23, 2004
KitMaker: 6,856 posts
Armorama: 6,363 posts
Posted: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 - 12:46 AM UTC
Damn!! Every time I decide not to buy any kits for at least a year, something like this comes up.
Maybe it won't be released till after a year
Maybe it won't be released till after a year
Sudzonic
Scotland, United Kingdom
Joined: December 07, 2007
KitMaker: 2,096 posts
Armorama: 1,983 posts
Joined: December 07, 2007
KitMaker: 2,096 posts
Armorama: 1,983 posts
Posted: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 - 06:35 AM UTC
Thats one nice looking kit . Think i mite have to invest in one.
fireontheway
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: May 17, 2006
KitMaker: 370 posts
Armorama: 368 posts
Joined: May 17, 2006
KitMaker: 370 posts
Armorama: 368 posts
Posted: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 - 11:00 AM UTC
Well seeing that buying one of these is as close as I am going to get to crewing one. My assignment will be exiting the ramp of an M1126 instead. So long 19K, hello 11B
LeoCmdr
Alberta, Canada
Joined: January 19, 2005
KitMaker: 4,085 posts
Armorama: 3,917 posts
Joined: January 19, 2005
KitMaker: 4,085 posts
Armorama: 3,917 posts
Posted: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 - 02:11 PM UTC
So far, so good.....hopefully the kit was designed from a production vehicle and not a prototype.
It should be fairly easy for aftermarket producers to come out with a slat armour set based on the already multiple existing sets and a gun shield for the .50 Cal. to bring it up to a current Iraq deployed version.
It should be fairly easy for aftermarket producers to come out with a slat armour set based on the already multiple existing sets and a gun shield for the .50 Cal. to bring it up to a current Iraq deployed version.
Keef1648
South Carolina, United States
Joined: January 23, 2008
KitMaker: 1,240 posts
Armorama: 1,192 posts
Joined: January 23, 2008
KitMaker: 1,240 posts
Armorama: 1,192 posts
Posted: Thursday, May 15, 2008 - 01:42 AM UTC
Thank heavens I work in a model shop, employee discount is wonderful...Gotta have this one.
Keith.
Keith.
warlock109
Utah, United States
Joined: February 05, 2004
KitMaker: 163 posts
Armorama: 160 posts
Joined: February 05, 2004
KitMaker: 163 posts
Armorama: 160 posts
Posted: Friday, May 16, 2008 - 09:25 AM UTC
Looks like I'm going to need about 4 of them. I wonder why they have a seam along the top of the thermo shield on the gun instead of using slide mold tech to make it one piece?
Jerry
Jerry
18Bravo
Colorado, United States
Joined: January 20, 2005
KitMaker: 7,219 posts
Armorama: 6,097 posts
Joined: January 20, 2005
KitMaker: 7,219 posts
Armorama: 6,097 posts
Posted: Friday, May 16, 2008 - 12:01 PM UTC
A tad annoying that they don't post pics of the completed model. At any rate, comparing it with my walkaround, several obvious things jump out, without even looking hard.
The recoil mechanism housing is lacking some VERY prominent double bead welds, on both sides. However, because of where they've placed the seams, they can be hidden if one chooses to add the welds.
The hatch on the rear turret plate is flush on the real thing, not proud as depicted in the kit.
Another hatch on the top rear of the turret has a wide rim all the way around it. The real hatch is perfectly flat.
For the rivet counters - on the plus side, they are all correctly numbered and placed, but the bolt heads on the turret top are far out of scale.
If they had shown if there's going to be any semblance of an interior of the turret, I could comment on that, but alas...
I imagine there's a lot more to find, but I'll wait until I have one in hand.
The recoil mechanism housing is lacking some VERY prominent double bead welds, on both sides. However, because of where they've placed the seams, they can be hidden if one chooses to add the welds.
The hatch on the rear turret plate is flush on the real thing, not proud as depicted in the kit.
Another hatch on the top rear of the turret has a wide rim all the way around it. The real hatch is perfectly flat.
For the rivet counters - on the plus side, they are all correctly numbered and placed, but the bolt heads on the turret top are far out of scale.
If they had shown if there's going to be any semblance of an interior of the turret, I could comment on that, but alas...
I imagine there's a lot more to find, but I'll wait until I have one in hand.
LeoCmdr
Alberta, Canada
Joined: January 19, 2005
KitMaker: 4,085 posts
Armorama: 3,917 posts
Joined: January 19, 2005
KitMaker: 4,085 posts
Armorama: 3,917 posts
Posted: Saturday, May 17, 2008 - 04:54 AM UTC
Based on the comparisons would you be able to say that they just cut corners on the kit or are they basing the kit on a pre-production version?
18Bravo
Colorado, United States
Joined: January 20, 2005
KitMaker: 7,219 posts
Armorama: 6,097 posts
Joined: January 20, 2005
KitMaker: 7,219 posts
Armorama: 6,097 posts
Posted: Sunday, May 18, 2008 - 02:55 AM UTC
I don't think it was a preproduction vehicle. My thoughts are that they probably had most of the kinks worked out of the vehicle, and then added the already tested turret. Of course, that's why I'm the team weapons sergeant and not the team engineer. The oddly shaped cutouts on either side of the turret near the pivot point area are absolutely correct, along with everything I had time to look at. (my connection is EXTREMELY slow...)
From looking at the photos, without actually having the kit in front of me, everything looks dimensionally and proportionally correct. I have no explanation for the hatch errors - they are very noticable. The one on the top of the turret does'nt look to be an easy fix. It's going to involve a little cutting and filling.
As for the missing weld seams on the recoil mechanism housing, perhaps they chose not to use the highly vaunted, and age old method of using slide molds, which would cost a bit more. But, as I said, adding the welds will hide the prominent gaps you see on each side of the housing, as they are in the same location. Other turret welds are missing as well. Perhaps they just wanted to leave something for us to occupy our time with.
The overly large bolt detail is something we've learned to accept from more than one manufacturer. I must say the sight on the left turret looks very good. My photos have it open (which is by far more interesting) but the overall shape and details are spot on.
I wish they had added the rear hull plate, but I guess we'll have to wait. At least by leaving off the hull armor it's easy to see that the left hull hatches will be correctly flush, and that the hinges will be correctly recessed.
From looking at the photos, without actually having the kit in front of me, everything looks dimensionally and proportionally correct. I have no explanation for the hatch errors - they are very noticable. The one on the top of the turret does'nt look to be an easy fix. It's going to involve a little cutting and filling.
As for the missing weld seams on the recoil mechanism housing, perhaps they chose not to use the highly vaunted, and age old method of using slide molds, which would cost a bit more. But, as I said, adding the welds will hide the prominent gaps you see on each side of the housing, as they are in the same location. Other turret welds are missing as well. Perhaps they just wanted to leave something for us to occupy our time with.
The overly large bolt detail is something we've learned to accept from more than one manufacturer. I must say the sight on the left turret looks very good. My photos have it open (which is by far more interesting) but the overall shape and details are spot on.
I wish they had added the rear hull plate, but I guess we'll have to wait. At least by leaving off the hull armor it's easy to see that the left hull hatches will be correctly flush, and that the hinges will be correctly recessed.
35th-scale
Kildare, Ireland
Joined: November 21, 2007
KitMaker: 3,212 posts
Armorama: 2,807 posts
Joined: November 21, 2007
KitMaker: 3,212 posts
Armorama: 2,807 posts
Posted: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 - 08:08 PM UTC
Has anyone heard when this will be available yet?