_GOTOBOTTOM
Constructive Feedback
For in-progress or completed build photos. Give and get contructive feedback!
Sherman III, Naples 1943
paulchatfield
Visit this Community
England - South West, United Kingdom
Joined: May 27, 2008
KitMaker: 144 posts
Armorama: 136 posts
Posted: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 - 05:36 AM UTC
Just made a start on Dragon's Sherman III. It will be a Sherman from around Naples with a "spotty" finish.
These Shermans had a hatch from a commanders cupola placed in front of the driver's position.
It's been suggested to me that this was not a scrap or spare item but taken from the cupola of the actual tank it was used on. Anyone have more info on this, particually why would you take a hatch from the top of the Tank and place it in front of the driver, wouldn't a steel plate or spare track protect as well(if not better)?
AlanL
Visit this Community
England - East Anglia, United Kingdom
Joined: August 12, 2005
KitMaker: 14,499 posts
Armorama: 11,675 posts
Posted: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 - 06:48 AM UTC
Hi Paul,

I've seen this technique used on other Shermans in NWE. I can't confirm or deny whether or not this was actually a hatch from the tank commanders copula but I some how doubt it.

Still never say never.

To me they look simply like some additional protection added because they were around, probably form damaged/destroyed tanks. but.......

Al
exer
Visit this Community
Dublin, Ireland
Joined: November 27, 2004
KitMaker: 6,048 posts
Armorama: 4,619 posts
Posted: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 - 11:14 AM UTC
It was common practice for the tank commander to drive around with the rear half of his hatch open so he could peek out rather than look through the periscope, when the tank stopped suddenly the hatch would crash down on his head so crews started removing the rear half of the hatch altogether, this carried over in some units to Italy and Italy. I think I read that in Alamein to Zem Zem- Keith Douglas's memoir of the desert war.
ALBOWIE
Visit this Community
New South Wales, Australia
Joined: February 28, 2006
KitMaker: 1,605 posts
Armorama: 1,565 posts
Posted: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 - 12:09 PM UTC
The earliest Shermans had none or poor locking of open hatches resulting in many injuries (some quite serious) from vehicle movement or nearby explosions. In the Desert the 8th Army removed one of these and improvised locking latches. The Greys were one of the units that had served in the 8th Army and continued the practice over to the Italian Campaign and even NWE. If you read the description of Wittmans demise the TC of the 1NY Firefly was put of action by his hatch cover. Adding the hatch cover as armour is sometimes seen. Another practice with 8th army Shermans was to remove the Guns basket shield and stow it on the rear deck or even the front sponson. This was unnoficial whereas the cupola hatch was official. The reason for this removal was to facilitate the loders egress in case of bail out.
Most of these little things learnt by the British in the Desert were introduced as production features later on.
AL
AlanL
Visit this Community
England - East Anglia, United Kingdom
Joined: August 12, 2005
KitMaker: 14,499 posts
Armorama: 11,675 posts
Posted: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 - 06:22 PM UTC
Hi Folks,

Thanks for that interesting piece of information, never say never. Looks like the suggestion was the correct one Paul, forge ahead Look forward to the build.

Al
tjkelly
Visit this Community
Maryland, United States
Joined: May 04, 2007
KitMaker: 1,132 posts
Armorama: 1,123 posts
Posted: Friday, May 30, 2008 - 01:47 AM UTC
Nice unique touch, makes for a great conversation starter that's for sure. Look forward to your progress, thanks for sharing.

Cheers -

Tim
 _GOTOTOP