Howdy. I think I read here in Armorama that Italeris M32 wasn't a post tank. It served in WW2. There was a photo too. So it wasn't so bad after all. Maybe have to change the tracks.
Hosted by Darren Baker
M32 Sherman recovery
hackman
Sweden
Joined: June 23, 2008
KitMaker: 130 posts
Armorama: 120 posts
Joined: June 23, 2008
KitMaker: 130 posts
Armorama: 120 posts
Posted: Friday, July 04, 2008 - 07:09 AM UTC
KoSprueOne
Myanmar
Joined: March 05, 2004
KitMaker: 4,011 posts
Armorama: 1,498 posts
Joined: March 05, 2004
KitMaker: 4,011 posts
Armorama: 1,498 posts
Posted: Friday, July 04, 2008 - 01:35 PM UTC
Alright. I read and posted into that thread that you are referring to.
I bet more pictures are going to be posted to public now. Good.
A lot of model builders have built this vehicle but were not going to do the conversions required, but built OOB.
However I haven't even started my kit yet. The box is dusty.
I bet more pictures are going to be posted to public now. Good.
A lot of model builders have built this vehicle but were not going to do the conversions required, but built OOB.
However I haven't even started my kit yet. The box is dusty.
GeraldOwens
Florida, United States
Joined: March 30, 2006
KitMaker: 3,736 posts
Armorama: 3,697 posts
Joined: March 30, 2006
KitMaker: 3,736 posts
Armorama: 3,697 posts
Posted: Friday, July 04, 2008 - 03:45 PM UTC
It wasn't a postwar variant. The main problem with Italeri's kit is that virtually all the M32B1 recovery vehicles were built on the earlier M4A1 hulls with the small driver's hatches, as seen in the Tasca Shermans or the older Dragon Early M4A1. Only one photo of an M32B1 with large hatches has ever been published, as far as I know, and it only turned up on the Missing Lynx site a week or two ago.
The M32 series also used welded hull early M4 hulls (base-model M32), or the welded hull M4A2 for the US Marines (designated M32B2). A small batch were also built on the large hatch welded hull with the 47 degree hull front for the Marines, but these missed the war, going on to serve in Korea.
In the early 1950's large numbers of obsolete M4A3 with HVSS suspension were converted to recovery vehicles, and designated M74. These had stronger winches, sturdier jibs, and additional stowage boxes.
The M32 series also used welded hull early M4 hulls (base-model M32), or the welded hull M4A2 for the US Marines (designated M32B2). A small batch were also built on the large hatch welded hull with the 47 degree hull front for the Marines, but these missed the war, going on to serve in Korea.
In the early 1950's large numbers of obsolete M4A3 with HVSS suspension were converted to recovery vehicles, and designated M74. These had stronger winches, sturdier jibs, and additional stowage boxes.
AikinutNY
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: October 21, 2003
KitMaker: 683 posts
Armorama: 630 posts
Joined: October 21, 2003
KitMaker: 683 posts
Armorama: 630 posts
Posted: Friday, July 04, 2008 - 04:14 PM UTC
Jan,
Some good news is that there were pictures of the large hatch Sherman M-32 posted so it does model a M32 correctly. Well as correct as the Italeri Sherman is anyway.
Look how it pushed over that iron reinforcement bar.LOL
Some good news is that there were pictures of the large hatch Sherman M-32 posted so it does model a M32 correctly. Well as correct as the Italeri Sherman is anyway.
Look how it pushed over that iron reinforcement bar.LOL
Posted: Friday, July 04, 2008 - 07:42 PM UTC
yes,
there are a few photos knocking around somewhere of these shermans with the large hatches, but these are few and far between, so the hull could be ok, as long as you check your references and model a perticular vehicle.
Where you have used chain for the whinch, this should be ( SWR ) Steel wire rope, in model scale, picture hanging wire, but overall, well done,you have done a good job on the base, and the figures.
well done,
malc.
there are a few photos knocking around somewhere of these shermans with the large hatches, but these are few and far between, so the hull could be ok, as long as you check your references and model a perticular vehicle.
Where you have used chain for the whinch, this should be ( SWR ) Steel wire rope, in model scale, picture hanging wire, but overall, well done,you have done a good job on the base, and the figures.
well done,
malc.
210cav
Virginia, United States
Joined: February 05, 2002
KitMaker: 6,149 posts
Armorama: 4,573 posts
Joined: February 05, 2002
KitMaker: 6,149 posts
Armorama: 4,573 posts
Posted: Friday, July 04, 2008 - 11:44 PM UTC
Looks good.
hackman
Sweden
Joined: June 23, 2008
KitMaker: 130 posts
Armorama: 120 posts
Joined: June 23, 2008
KitMaker: 130 posts
Armorama: 120 posts
Posted: Saturday, July 05, 2008 - 12:09 AM UTC
Thanks, you are all very kind. I had problems what chain to use and how it goes.
ericadeane
Michigan, United States
Joined: October 28, 2002
KitMaker: 4,021 posts
Armorama: 3,947 posts
Joined: October 28, 2002
KitMaker: 4,021 posts
Armorama: 3,947 posts
Posted: Saturday, July 05, 2008 - 11:34 AM UTC
I concur with the other poster about using the chain. The pullies were designed for metal cables, not chains. Also there has not been a "bunch" of pictures of the large hatch M4A1, only a SINGLE one and it featured the late M4A1 cast in hull side patches.
Regardless, thanx for posting your pics, Jan!
Regardless, thanx for posting your pics, Jan!
jphillips
Arizona, United States
Joined: February 25, 2007
KitMaker: 1,066 posts
Armorama: 789 posts
Joined: February 25, 2007
KitMaker: 1,066 posts
Armorama: 789 posts
Posted: Saturday, July 05, 2008 - 01:58 PM UTC
Great job on the M32. I was thinking about doing one sometime before they're all gone (they seem to be getting scarcer, I think maybe it was a limited edition). I just hope mine turns out as nice! I'll remember about the picture wire, too. I don't care about it being a postwar vehicle; I was planning on doing an Israeli one anyway.