Hello!
Last week I've finished my Swedish post war Strv 103 tank (yes - it is turretless but is considered as a tank). It reminds me of Jagdpanther and I've really enjoyed building it (Trumpeters 1:35 kit). On www.primeportal.net/the_battlefield.html I've found interesing four-coloured camouflage schames. All Strv103 walkarounds featured 103C version (my is 103B), but I've really liked that camo and put visual look over historical accuracy. I've spent hours masking complex shapes with Tamiya tape and masking fluid. Was it worth it? Here are some photos:
Hosted by Darren Baker
Sweden STRV 103B MBT Gallery
piotrreddig
Wojewodztwo Warminsko-Mazurskie, Poland
Joined: June 10, 2007
KitMaker: 15 posts
Armorama: 14 posts
Joined: June 10, 2007
KitMaker: 15 posts
Armorama: 14 posts
Posted: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 - 11:15 AM UTC
muchachos
Ontario, Canada
Joined: May 21, 2008
KitMaker: 537 posts
Armorama: 439 posts
Joined: May 21, 2008
KitMaker: 537 posts
Armorama: 439 posts
Posted: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 - 12:48 PM UTC
That is so cool! The masking work was definitely worth it. Its such an odd tank, and it looks great.
liberator
Luzon, Philippines
Joined: May 15, 2004
KitMaker: 1,086 posts
Armorama: 783 posts
Joined: May 15, 2004
KitMaker: 1,086 posts
Armorama: 783 posts
Posted: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 - 01:32 PM UTC
hi piotr, nice build..i like the paint job and the surface finish..not too flat and not glossy either. you did a pretty job on the camouflage too and weathering..specially the mud on the underside. thanks for sharing. ed
spookman
Joined: September 09, 2007
KitMaker: 9 posts
Armorama: 6 posts
KitMaker: 9 posts
Armorama: 6 posts
Posted: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 - 02:17 PM UTC
Great job on the camo! I'm doing a 103C and am almost at that stage. Hours masking eh?
DeskJockey
Virginia, United States
Joined: July 17, 2006
KitMaker: 1,558 posts
Armorama: 1,159 posts
Joined: July 17, 2006
KitMaker: 1,558 posts
Armorama: 1,159 posts
Posted: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 - 02:29 PM UTC
Wow! It looks great!!!!
I've always liked the 103B more than the 103C for its cleaner lines, and in this cammo scheme it looks really sleek and futuristic. Very well done.
I've always liked the 103B more than the 103C for its cleaner lines, and in this cammo scheme it looks really sleek and futuristic. Very well done.
marsiascout
Noord-Brabant, Netherlands
Joined: March 24, 2008
KitMaker: 1,247 posts
Armorama: 913 posts
Joined: March 24, 2008
KitMaker: 1,247 posts
Armorama: 913 posts
Posted: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 - 11:55 PM UTC
Perfect painting and weathering!
Lars
Lars
The_Swede
Jönköping, Sweden
Joined: March 03, 2002
KitMaker: 327 posts
Armorama: 259 posts
Joined: March 03, 2002
KitMaker: 327 posts
Armorama: 259 posts
Posted: Thursday, August 14, 2008 - 07:05 AM UTC
Looks nice, but.
You switched the boxes on the front sponsons.
The box with the two MG-ports should be on the left side of the front, not the right side.
Also, on a B-version there should only be 4 digits in the registration number.
The first two (20) should be removed.
/Thord
You switched the boxes on the front sponsons.
The box with the two MG-ports should be on the left side of the front, not the right side.
Also, on a B-version there should only be 4 digits in the registration number.
The first two (20) should be removed.
/Thord
Boxster
Joined: November 08, 2005
KitMaker: 55 posts
Armorama: 47 posts
KitMaker: 55 posts
Armorama: 47 posts
Posted: Sunday, September 14, 2008 - 08:22 AM UTC
Now, that is nice!!!
B
B
Posted: Sunday, September 14, 2008 - 10:42 PM UTC
"Was it worth it?" Yes, it definitely was! Brilliant-looking tank. Let us know how you managed to get the masking over all the lumpy bits.
Posted: Monday, September 15, 2008 - 01:36 AM UTC
Excellent job. As already pointed out, your masking effort was well worth it.
Thanks for sharing
Thanks for sharing