I have run into the following interesting pictures from the North Africa theatre. Here is the source blog and the specific post.
This is a Crusader, I guess, disguised as a truck: (link):
A Churchill:(link):
And a Grant: (link):
Hosted by Darren Baker
Now It’s Truck and Now It’s Not
Galwitz
Connecticut, United States
Joined: June 12, 2007
KitMaker: 498 posts
Armorama: 406 posts
Joined: June 12, 2007
KitMaker: 498 posts
Armorama: 406 posts
Posted: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 - 01:38 AM UTC
Galwitz
Connecticut, United States
Joined: June 12, 2007
KitMaker: 498 posts
Armorama: 406 posts
Joined: June 12, 2007
KitMaker: 498 posts
Armorama: 406 posts
Posted: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 - 01:48 AM UTC
I'm sorry, I honestly don't know why some of the pics are not shown properly. The URL in embedded HTML is correct. So I at least added a direct links to the remote pictures (which also seems to be displayed in bigger/original size).
lespauljames
England - South West, United Kingdom
Joined: January 06, 2007
KitMaker: 3,661 posts
Armorama: 2,764 posts
Joined: January 06, 2007
KitMaker: 3,661 posts
Armorama: 2,764 posts
Posted: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 - 02:22 AM UTC
these were diguised to confuse recce planes and the luftwaffe, although i believe the figters would more likely strafe trucks unless equipped with the cannons?
AikinutNY
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: October 21, 2003
KitMaker: 683 posts
Armorama: 630 posts
Joined: October 21, 2003
KitMaker: 683 posts
Armorama: 630 posts
Posted: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 - 02:30 AM UTC
Monte's trick at El Alamain AFV's were made to look like trucks and moved south, trucks and dummies were used up north to look like AFV's to draw the German armor. Rommel ended up attacking the wrong direction.
The same thing was used in SE England before D-Day to lead the German recon into thinking that the main attack was at Calais.
The same thing was used in SE England before D-Day to lead the German recon into thinking that the main attack was at Calais.
Removed by original poster on 09/16/08 - 13:44:59 (GMT).
AJLaFleche
Massachusetts, United States
Joined: May 05, 2002
KitMaker: 8,074 posts
Armorama: 3,293 posts
Joined: May 05, 2002
KitMaker: 8,074 posts
Armorama: 3,293 posts
Posted: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 - 02:45 AM UTC
The html code was messed up. To see what it should look like, click on the "reply with quote" button.
Additionally, the badwidth may be getting exceeded.
210cav
Virginia, United States
Joined: February 05, 2002
KitMaker: 6,149 posts
Armorama: 4,573 posts
Joined: February 05, 2002
KitMaker: 6,149 posts
Armorama: 4,573 posts
Posted: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 - 02:53 AM UTC
Quoted Text
The html code was messed up. To see what it should look like, click on the "reply with quote" button.
Nice photos
vanize
Texas, United States
Joined: January 30, 2006
KitMaker: 1,954 posts
Armorama: 629 posts
Joined: January 30, 2006
KitMaker: 1,954 posts
Armorama: 629 posts
Posted: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 - 06:02 AM UTC
Quoted Text
these were diguised to confuse recce planes and the luftwaffe, although i believe the figters would more likely strafe trucks unless equipped with the cannons?
better that they strafe a tank made to look like a truck, which won't take much damage, than a supply truck, which will be destroyed!
Desmoquattro
New Brunswick, Canada
Joined: September 10, 2008
KitMaker: 235 posts
Armorama: 168 posts
Joined: September 10, 2008
KitMaker: 235 posts
Armorama: 168 posts
Posted: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 - 08:22 AM UTC
Really? You think some 20mm cannons firing at high RPM wouldn't be a bit of a problem against the usually-thin top armour of a Brit tank? I wouldn't want to be in that tank, that's for sure.