I have just bought the above new kit. Having opened the box I couldn’t resist buying this model. Detail looks amazing, can't comment on the accuracy as I am not familiar with the vehicle. I think it will build into a superb looking model. The box is large and pretty full with, kit parts, Photo Etched brass, masks for the hatch glazing, Water, Beverage & MRE Ration boxes, Strapping, 4 crew figures and stowage Everything you need to build a complete model, for £23 not bad. I think I will be building more of these kits. I’m not going to start adding other PE sets so where have these vehicles saw action in Iraq and Afghanistan I presume.
Cookie
Hosted by Darren Baker
Trumpeter M1127 Stryker RV
Cookie
Northern Ireland, United Kingdom
Joined: September 21, 2003
KitMaker: 588 posts
Armorama: 490 posts
Joined: September 21, 2003
KitMaker: 588 posts
Armorama: 490 posts
Posted: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 - 03:43 AM UTC
seb43
Paris, France
Joined: August 30, 2005
KitMaker: 2,315 posts
Armorama: 2,158 posts
Joined: August 30, 2005
KitMaker: 2,315 posts
Armorama: 2,158 posts
Posted: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 - 04:19 AM UTC
So pics will a great addition to your post
sopmod6
Tokyo-to, Japan / 日本
Joined: March 31, 2005
KitMaker: 761 posts
Armorama: 455 posts
Joined: March 31, 2005
KitMaker: 761 posts
Armorama: 455 posts
Posted: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 - 04:25 AM UTC
Its a nice kit, but still not too impressed with it. I got a couple of them, and after looking it over, some detail is still missing and that lower hull bottom is still what it is. Some parts are nice while others are underscaled or simplified. The tires are a little skinny, but now have the trades on them. Is that the trade off we get? The fit of top hull to bottom is fiddly.
They could've made the plastic slightly thicker. I'll be replacing my LRAS with an AM part, to include the power assisted 2nd Gen mount for it. The etch parts are nice too.
They could've made the plastic slightly thicker. I'll be replacing my LRAS with an AM part, to include the power assisted 2nd Gen mount for it. The etch parts are nice too.
35th-scale
Kildare, Ireland
Joined: November 21, 2007
KitMaker: 3,212 posts
Armorama: 2,807 posts
Joined: November 21, 2007
KitMaker: 3,212 posts
Armorama: 2,807 posts
Posted: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 - 06:30 AM UTC
Quoted Text
.I’m not going to start adding other PE sets so where have these vehicles saw action in Iraq and Afghanistan I presume.
The problem here is that any Strykers that were in Iraq had the slat armor. Every single one. Not just later ones. I think Afganistan would be the same.
I don't have the patience or money for that but wanted to build the Stryker and make it look "used", but unless you're putting it in a dio that is obviously Iraq it doesn't really matter. Please post pics! Here's my AFV 1130:
Sorry about the pic quality. It's a deliberate attempt to hide the flaws and mistakes;-)
I've also done the 1126 from AFV and the 1128 & Trumps 1127 are "in the post"
parrot
Ontario, Canada
Joined: March 01, 2002
KitMaker: 1,607 posts
Armorama: 1,581 posts
Joined: March 01, 2002
KitMaker: 1,607 posts
Armorama: 1,581 posts
Posted: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 - 10:31 AM UTC
Posted: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 - 02:21 PM BST
I just recieved mine and Trumpeter is getting the most part of my kit budget.
What other company gives you more of a bang for your buck?
Besides slat armor and glue,it has everything.
Stowage,tie down straps,masking for windshield,beverage and ration boxes,3 figures and what I love about Trumpeter is the option between using PE or molded parts.
They are fast becoming or actually are the best for modern kit builders.
REPLY
REPLY & QUOTE
EDIT
DELETE
I just recieved mine and Trumpeter is getting the most part of my kit budget.
What other company gives you more of a bang for your buck?
Besides slat armor and glue,it has everything.
Stowage,tie down straps,masking for windshield,beverage and ration boxes,3 figures and what I love about Trumpeter is the option between using PE or molded parts.
They are fast becoming or actually are the best for modern kit builders.
REPLY
REPLY & QUOTE
EDIT
DELETE
Cookie
Northern Ireland, United Kingdom
Joined: September 21, 2003
KitMaker: 588 posts
Armorama: 490 posts
Joined: September 21, 2003
KitMaker: 588 posts
Armorama: 490 posts
Posted: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 - 11:52 AM UTC
Quite agree Tom.So we can't model it in an Iraqi or Afghan setting because of the slot Armour. So where has this piece of kit seen action .
Cookie
Cookie
DT61
Ontario, Canada
Joined: September 18, 2005
KitMaker: 1,226 posts
Armorama: 819 posts
Joined: September 18, 2005
KitMaker: 1,226 posts
Armorama: 819 posts
Posted: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 - 12:51 PM UTC
It is used by the US Army in Korea. That might be an option.
Darryl
Darryl
rcnpthfndr
Washington, United States
Joined: February 15, 2006
KitMaker: 284 posts
Armorama: 264 posts
Joined: February 15, 2006
KitMaker: 284 posts
Armorama: 264 posts
Posted: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 - 12:53 PM UTC
iraq for now. there are no strykers in korea, 3/2 was over there for "Foal Eagle" none remained behind.
Hisham
Al Qahirah, Egypt / لعربية
Joined: July 23, 2004
KitMaker: 6,856 posts
Armorama: 6,363 posts
Joined: July 23, 2004
KitMaker: 6,856 posts
Armorama: 6,363 posts
Posted: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 - 08:55 PM UTC
How about a diorama of a training setting in the US, or do those have slat armour too?
Hisham
Hisham
bulivyf
Vendor
Praha, Czech Republic
Joined: April 03, 2006
KitMaker: 2,450 posts
Armorama: 2,409 posts
Joined: April 03, 2006
KitMaker: 2,450 posts
Armorama: 2,409 posts
Posted: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 - 09:46 PM UTC
I recommended all who plan Stryker without Slat armor very interested book from Bob Burik NTC Fort Irwin
Miloslav
http://perthmilitarymodelling.com/reviews/books/wwp/wwpsp07.html
Miloslav
http://perthmilitarymodelling.com/reviews/books/wwp/wwpsp07.html
sgtreef
Oklahoma, United States
Joined: March 01, 2002
KitMaker: 6,043 posts
Armorama: 4,347 posts
Joined: March 01, 2002
KitMaker: 6,043 posts
Armorama: 4,347 posts
Posted: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 - 10:16 PM UTC
Now said all Strykers have slat armor.
Do the M-1128 ones do I have heard they do not come with it?
Thanks
Do the M-1128 ones do I have heard they do not come with it?
Thanks
Ric_Cody
Georgia, United States
Joined: May 22, 2005
KitMaker: 299 posts
Armorama: 294 posts
Joined: May 22, 2005
KitMaker: 299 posts
Armorama: 294 posts
Posted: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 - 10:54 PM UTC
All variants have SLAT mounted. Just the M1128 has a diffrent design than the others so that there is room for the turret to rotate 360 degrees.
Ric
Ric
Cookie
Northern Ireland, United Kingdom
Joined: September 21, 2003
KitMaker: 588 posts
Armorama: 490 posts
Joined: September 21, 2003
KitMaker: 588 posts
Armorama: 490 posts
Posted: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 - 11:39 PM UTC
Any other country have these and if so have they used them in any conflict.
Cookie
Cookie
Boggie
Newfoundland, Canada
Joined: December 08, 2005
KitMaker: 1,370 posts
Armorama: 1,331 posts
Joined: December 08, 2005
KitMaker: 1,370 posts
Armorama: 1,331 posts
Posted: Thursday, September 25, 2008 - 12:16 AM UTC
Israel has a few Strykers but I have no idea if they have been used in active duty. Cool mods though.
Bill
www.israeli-weapons.com/.../trophy/Trophy.html
Bill
www.israeli-weapons.com/.../trophy/Trophy.html
awrc
Wisconsin, United States
Joined: April 18, 2005
KitMaker: 281 posts
Armorama: 201 posts
Joined: April 18, 2005
KitMaker: 281 posts
Armorama: 201 posts
Posted: Thursday, September 25, 2008 - 06:55 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Israel tested a grand total of 4 Strykers.
Somewhat under duress too, from what I remember reading.
Al
Cookie
Northern Ireland, United Kingdom
Joined: September 21, 2003
KitMaker: 588 posts
Armorama: 490 posts
Joined: September 21, 2003
KitMaker: 588 posts
Armorama: 490 posts
Posted: Friday, September 26, 2008 - 02:30 AM UTC
Gary
I note from your reply, that you say "Ones with out slat armor don't go into"action". What would there role be. I presume that there are very few areas in Iraq that you can travel without slat armour.
Cookie
I note from your reply, that you say "Ones with out slat armor don't go into"action". What would there role be. I presume that there are very few areas in Iraq that you can travel without slat armour.
Cookie
sopmod6
Tokyo-to, Japan / 日本
Joined: March 31, 2005
KitMaker: 761 posts
Armorama: 455 posts
Joined: March 31, 2005
KitMaker: 761 posts
Armorama: 455 posts
Posted: Friday, September 26, 2008 - 03:02 AM UTC
EVERY Stryker in Iraq is equipped with slat.
HeavyArty
Florida, United States
Joined: May 16, 2002
KitMaker: 17,694 posts
Armorama: 13,742 posts
Joined: May 16, 2002
KitMaker: 17,694 posts
Armorama: 13,742 posts
Posted: Friday, September 26, 2008 - 03:03 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Gary
I note from your reply, that you say "Ones with out slat armor don't go into"action". What would there role be. I presume that there are very few areas in Iraq that you can travel without slat armour.
Cookie
ALL Strykers in Iraq have slat armour. There are none used in non-combat roles. Any Stryker without it is in a training setting in Germany, Hawaii, Alaska, or the mainland US. Strykers are only deployed to Iraq, not Afghanistan.
NebLWeffah
Alberta, Canada
Joined: October 13, 2004
KitMaker: 1,683 posts
Armorama: 1,248 posts
Joined: October 13, 2004
KitMaker: 1,683 posts
Armorama: 1,248 posts
Posted: Friday, September 26, 2008 - 05:13 AM UTC
Hi Paul
If you want to build a Stryker without slat armour and do it realistically, then your only options are the vehicles deployed in the US or Germany with the training groups or maybe support units (don't know about that one - Gino...Gary? I'm thinking miltary police or security maybe...).
As stated clearly, you would not accurately be able to show a Stryker deployed in a combat zone, war setting or 'in action' in Iraq without the slat armour. Strykers are not currently deployed to Afghanistan and never have been but who knows about tomorrow.
Why not show it as one of the training group's vehicles? They are extensively 'used and abused' so there's pleanty of chance for weathering, diorama settings, showing it with figures, stowage etc. You could also build a 'what if' project and show it they way you want. There's a thread or two around here about someone wanting to build a Tiger tank and how it might be used on the moon or mars.......oh dear.... It is possible to go too far with 'what if' projects (only my opinion.....).
If you're building the model just for you and accuracy of setting is not a concern, then build it the way you want. Show an Iraqi deployed vehicle without slat armour, who cares. Just bear in mind that any contest or show you enter it into will pick up on that point and you'll be judged on it accordingly. If you post pictures of it here and call it 'accurate', then you'll get some pretty strong reactions. If you don't care about that, then whatever.
There is a wealth of information here on Armorama and lots of expert opinion and fact. There are more than a few people who post here and show their work who use these vehicles or are around them every day and have direct experience with their history and current deployment. There are also those that have done extensive research and have archives at their finger tips. If you ask, you'll get answers... Just remember, at the heart of it, we're all model builders and love the hobby.
Above all, have fun with it....
Bob
If you want to build a Stryker without slat armour and do it realistically, then your only options are the vehicles deployed in the US or Germany with the training groups or maybe support units (don't know about that one - Gino...Gary? I'm thinking miltary police or security maybe...).
As stated clearly, you would not accurately be able to show a Stryker deployed in a combat zone, war setting or 'in action' in Iraq without the slat armour. Strykers are not currently deployed to Afghanistan and never have been but who knows about tomorrow.
Why not show it as one of the training group's vehicles? They are extensively 'used and abused' so there's pleanty of chance for weathering, diorama settings, showing it with figures, stowage etc. You could also build a 'what if' project and show it they way you want. There's a thread or two around here about someone wanting to build a Tiger tank and how it might be used on the moon or mars.......oh dear.... It is possible to go too far with 'what if' projects (only my opinion.....).
If you're building the model just for you and accuracy of setting is not a concern, then build it the way you want. Show an Iraqi deployed vehicle without slat armour, who cares. Just bear in mind that any contest or show you enter it into will pick up on that point and you'll be judged on it accordingly. If you post pictures of it here and call it 'accurate', then you'll get some pretty strong reactions. If you don't care about that, then whatever.
There is a wealth of information here on Armorama and lots of expert opinion and fact. There are more than a few people who post here and show their work who use these vehicles or are around them every day and have direct experience with their history and current deployment. There are also those that have done extensive research and have archives at their finger tips. If you ask, you'll get answers... Just remember, at the heart of it, we're all model builders and love the hobby.
Above all, have fun with it....
Bob
35th-scale
Kildare, Ireland
Joined: November 21, 2007
KitMaker: 3,212 posts
Armorama: 2,807 posts
Joined: November 21, 2007
KitMaker: 3,212 posts
Armorama: 2,807 posts
Posted: Friday, September 26, 2008 - 07:05 AM UTC
Is the Slat put on pre or post deployment? There is a repair/rebuild center in Quatar AFAIK. Is this where the slat armor is attached? Presumably there's a testing ground there. A possibility of seeing one w/out slat in a desert environment! Pushing the "what if" a wee bit, but better than a Mars setting....