I have 3 figures for my Sherman Firefly,but i dont know which one to use.
Here are 3 pictures which one looks the best?
Kind regards
Karl
Constructive Feedback
For in-progress or completed build photos. Give and get contructive feedback!
For in-progress or completed build photos. Give and get contructive feedback!
Hosted by Darren Baker, Dave O'Meara
Which Firefly Figure
PanzerKarl
England - North West, United Kingdom
Joined: April 20, 2004
KitMaker: 2,439 posts
Armorama: 1,980 posts
Joined: April 20, 2004
KitMaker: 2,439 posts
Armorama: 1,980 posts
Posted: Friday, October 10, 2008 - 10:30 PM UTC
alanmac
United Kingdom
Joined: February 25, 2007
KitMaker: 3,033 posts
Armorama: 2,953 posts
Joined: February 25, 2007
KitMaker: 3,033 posts
Armorama: 2,953 posts
Posted: Friday, October 10, 2008 - 10:44 PM UTC
Hi Karl
Well I'd say number two is out, looks like somebody's Uncle trying to dance at a Wedding reception. Either one or three would be good. If you don't intend a base diorama I'd go with number three, in my opinion. Who makes that one by the way, I like it ?
Alan
Well I'd say number two is out, looks like somebody's Uncle trying to dance at a Wedding reception. Either one or three would be good. If you don't intend a base diorama I'd go with number three, in my opinion. Who makes that one by the way, I like it ?
Alan
PanzerKarl
England - North West, United Kingdom
Joined: April 20, 2004
KitMaker: 2,439 posts
Armorama: 1,980 posts
Joined: April 20, 2004
KitMaker: 2,439 posts
Armorama: 1,980 posts
Posted: Friday, October 10, 2008 - 11:14 PM UTC
Thanks Alan
The 1st and 3rd figures are Royal model figs,very nice detail on them.2nd figure is dragon the one that comes with the kit.
That made me laugh
Thanks
Karl
The 1st and 3rd figures are Royal model figs,very nice detail on them.2nd figure is dragon the one that comes with the kit.
Quoted Text
Well I'd say number two is out, looks like somebody's Uncle trying to dance at a Wedding reception
That made me laugh
Thanks
Karl
ppawlak1
Victoria, Australia
Joined: March 14, 2006
KitMaker: 1,973 posts
Armorama: 1,843 posts
Joined: March 14, 2006
KitMaker: 1,973 posts
Armorama: 1,843 posts
Posted: Friday, October 10, 2008 - 11:31 PM UTC
IMHO No 3 is the go !!
Cheers,
Paul
Cheers,
Paul
HONEYCUT
Victoria, Australia
Joined: May 07, 2003
KitMaker: 4,002 posts
Armorama: 2,947 posts
Joined: May 07, 2003
KitMaker: 4,002 posts
Armorama: 2,947 posts
Posted: Friday, October 10, 2008 - 11:31 PM UTC
Yepm, Uncle Arthur is out... The Royal models look good from what I can see Karl, although would you consider a change of head(s)?
The thrid is probably the clincher for me. The firsts pose would be for too specific a scene methinks?
Brad
The thrid is probably the clincher for me. The firsts pose would be for too specific a scene methinks?
Brad
exer
Dublin, Ireland
Joined: November 27, 2004
KitMaker: 6,048 posts
Armorama: 4,619 posts
Joined: November 27, 2004
KitMaker: 6,048 posts
Armorama: 4,619 posts
Posted: Saturday, October 11, 2008 - 12:02 AM UTC
Yes I'd go with Number three also.
Posted: Saturday, October 11, 2008 - 01:45 AM UTC
I like the first one. Its diffrent from what you normally see, The other 2 just seem like the same generic poses.
DT61
Ontario, Canada
Joined: September 18, 2005
KitMaker: 1,226 posts
Armorama: 819 posts
Joined: September 18, 2005
KitMaker: 1,226 posts
Armorama: 819 posts
Posted: Saturday, October 11, 2008 - 03:00 AM UTC
Karl,
Guess it depends on how you are protraying your Firefly. The first figure which is my favourite would look good for a vehicle stopped and the crew waiting for an order to move forward. The other two I think are would be for the vehicle in motion.
Just my humble .02 canadian cents
Darryl
Guess it depends on how you are protraying your Firefly. The first figure which is my favourite would look good for a vehicle stopped and the crew waiting for an order to move forward. The other two I think are would be for the vehicle in motion.
Just my humble .02 canadian cents
Darryl
PanzerKarl
England - North West, United Kingdom
Joined: April 20, 2004
KitMaker: 2,439 posts
Armorama: 1,980 posts
Joined: April 20, 2004
KitMaker: 2,439 posts
Armorama: 1,980 posts
Posted: Saturday, October 11, 2008 - 05:53 AM UTC
Cheers all
It looks like figure 1 or 2 .
ill have to wait till the fireflys painted and have another look.
But as darryl said it depends if the vehicle is moving,and am going to do the firefly sitting idle.
Many thanks
karl
It looks like figure 1 or 2 .
ill have to wait till the fireflys painted and have another look.
But as darryl said it depends if the vehicle is moving,and am going to do the firefly sitting idle.
Many thanks
karl
JackBlock
Oregon, United States
Joined: April 13, 2007
KitMaker: 144 posts
Armorama: 128 posts
Joined: April 13, 2007
KitMaker: 144 posts
Armorama: 128 posts
Posted: Monday, October 13, 2008 - 05:04 AM UTC
Number 3. Uncle Arthur needs a lamp shade on his head to complete the pic
Cheers
Dave
Cheers
Dave
jjumbo
British Columbia, Canada
Joined: August 27, 2006
KitMaker: 2,012 posts
Armorama: 1,949 posts
Joined: August 27, 2006
KitMaker: 2,012 posts
Armorama: 1,949 posts
Posted: Monday, October 13, 2008 - 06:54 AM UTC
Hey Karl,
Figure #1 works for me in a "behind the lines" scenario.
Figure #3 would be perfect for a "going into combat" scenario.
Either one would look good.
Cheers
jjumbo
Figure #1 works for me in a "behind the lines" scenario.
Figure #3 would be perfect for a "going into combat" scenario.
Either one would look good.
Cheers
jjumbo