_GOTOBOTTOM
Figures
Military figures of all shapes and sizes.
REVIEW
Masterbox - British Paras (Set # 2)
jimbrae
Visit this Community
Provincia de Lugo, Spain / Espaņa
Joined: April 23, 2003
KitMaker: 12,927 posts
Armorama: 9,486 posts
Posted: Thursday, November 06, 2008 - 07:42 PM UTC
Just posted, the first of two Reviews covering the New Masterbox British Airborne sets in 1/35th scale. The Full-Build Review can be seen:

Link to Item

If you have comments or questions please post them here.

Thanks!

MrMox
Visit this Community
Aarhus, Denmark
Joined: July 18, 2003
KitMaker: 3,377 posts
Armorama: 1,088 posts
Posted: Friday, November 07, 2008 - 02:15 AM UTC
Nice review - thanks!

I like the "vingette in a box" philosofi in these releases - very attractive and is sure to find its way into my stash.

Cheers/Jan
jimbrae
Visit this Community
Provincia de Lugo, Spain / Espaņa
Joined: April 23, 2003
KitMaker: 12,927 posts
Armorama: 9,486 posts
Posted: Saturday, November 08, 2008 - 12:21 AM UTC
Jan, good though this set is, the OTHER set which i'm also Reviewing is, in my opinion even better...
Sandy
Visit this Community
England - East Anglia, United Kingdom
Joined: June 24, 2002
KitMaker: 628 posts
Armorama: 405 posts
Posted: Saturday, November 08, 2008 - 12:37 AM UTC
Hi Jim slight problem with your review , that needs changing , Ist Pattern Denison had no knitted cuffs , they were added by soldiers from top halfs of socks , second pattern they were fitted as standard . 3rd pattern very rare the two bottom pockets were increased in size , mainly issued to officers who had the full length zip inserted . Lastly the rarest pattern was issued to Marines who had the half zip removed and buttons and button holes fitted . All held in private museum to which I am researcher and curator cheers ian
jimbrae
Visit this Community
Provincia de Lugo, Spain / Espaņa
Joined: April 23, 2003
KitMaker: 12,927 posts
Armorama: 9,486 posts
Posted: Saturday, November 08, 2008 - 12:52 AM UTC
Thanks for the comments Ian. I didn't though use 'First Version' I stated that it was the earlier with the knitted cuffs. Perhaps I should have said 'intermediate'?

So, using a comparative form rather than a superlative (Earlier vs. EARLIEST), at the danger of sounding arrogant about it, I won't be editing the Review.

Most people who have gone into the subject should have sufficient references to clear up what IS a slightly confusing subject - your comments are appreciated.

Oh, and from personal experience, the Denison was still in MoD stocks and getting issued into the '70s. I had one which had a W.D. production date of 1944....

Wish to hell i'd reported it stolen...
 _GOTOTOP