_GOTOBOTTOM
Armor/AFV: Vietnam
All things Vietnam
Hosted by Darren Baker
5 ton M-386 Honest John Missle launcher help
pfc
#333
Visit this Community
Oklahoma, United States
Joined: October 13, 2002
KitMaker: 1,017 posts
Armorama: 752 posts
Posted: Monday, January 05, 2009 - 06:21 PM UTC
Hey guys Im gathering info to scratch build the 5 ton M-386. I have gathered quite a bit of specs and a few pics but Im needing a few close ups of the componets on the rear of the truck. Any info will help. From what I gather the 5 Ton M- 386 was a modified M-139 long wheel base truck with 14.00 x 20 tires it had a 115v generator set for heating the rocket ( some photos of this would be nice). Length 389in,width114in, height 164in with a wheel base of 215in. I plan to use RealModles 5 ton cab conversion for the AFV Club M35 and the Italeri 5 ton truck and a set of Tank Work Shop M123A1 wheels if I can get them. Everything else will be all scratch. Would there be much size difference in 1/35 in a 14.00x20 and 14.00x24 tire. Thanx
Frenchy
Visit this Community
Rhone, France
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Posted: Monday, January 05, 2009 - 06:41 PM UTC
Hi Keenan
Did you see the few M386 pics on Mil-Mod
( 3 TM drawings Here )
HTH

Frenchy
pfc
#333
Visit this Community
Oklahoma, United States
Joined: October 13, 2002
KitMaker: 1,017 posts
Armorama: 752 posts
Posted: Monday, January 05, 2009 - 06:54 PM UTC
Yes i have those but thanks anyway Frenchy they are some great pics. I wonder if their is a tech manual for the truck anywhere
pfc
#333
Visit this Community
Oklahoma, United States
Joined: October 13, 2002
KitMaker: 1,017 posts
Armorama: 752 posts
Posted: Monday, January 05, 2009 - 06:57 PM UTC
Frenchy I clicked on your first link I did not have those pics that what I need.
trickymissfit
Joined: October 03, 2007
KitMaker: 1,388 posts
Armorama: 1,357 posts
Posted: Monday, January 05, 2009 - 07:47 PM UTC

Quoted Text

Hey guys Im gathering info to scratch build the 5 ton M-386. I have gathered quite a bit of specs and a few pics but Im needing a few close ups of the componets on the rear of the truck. Any info will help. From what I gather the 5 Ton M- 386 was a modified M-139 long wheel base truck with 14.00 x 20 tires it had a 115v generator set for heating the rocket ( some photos of this would be nice). Length 389in,width114in, height 164in with a wheel base of 215in. I plan to use RealModles 5 ton cab conversion for the AFV Club M35 and the Italeri 5 ton truck and a set of Tank Work Shop M123A1 wheels if I can get them. Everything else will be all scratch. Would there be much size difference in 1/35 in a 14.00x20 and 14.00x24 tire. Thanx



I have one of those things on display about twenty minutes south of me. Looking at the truck, it's not a 5 ton. Looks more like the old 10 ton wrecker chassis to me (maybe I'm wrong, but it's sure bigger than a 5 ton). If you need pics let me know, as I'm down there a couple times a month. And a note about the tires. They are the same size as the ones used on the 8" towed howitzer, but with the all terrane tread pattern. The 8" down there uses an automotive type tread pattern for some odd reason.
gary
Frenchy
Visit this Community
Rhone, France
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Posted: Monday, January 05, 2009 - 10:08 PM UTC

Quoted Text

I wonder if their is a tech manual for the truck anywhere



TM 9-1005-205-20P "Truck-Mounted 762 MM Rocket Launcher M386"
It can be found here :
http://www.idsabooks.com/cgi-bin/idb455/1059.html

TM9-1055-205-35 "Field and Depot Maintenance, Truck Mounted 762mm Rocket Launcher M386- Honest John"
This one can be found here :
http://www.amherst-depot.com/weapons-manuals.htm


The Improved (M50) Honest John Rocket System monography (in PDF format) includes some info about the M386.


HTH
Frenchy
Frenchy
Visit this Community
Rhone, France
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 - 12:42 AM UTC
Just came across these pics on Flikr :
British M386 at Duxford IWM :






Hi-Res

HTH
Frenchy
corsutton
Visit this Community
Oklahoma, United States
Joined: June 17, 2005
KitMaker: 544 posts
Armorama: 511 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 - 01:31 AM UTC
I see that you are in Oklahoma, have you seen the one at the 45th infantry museum in Oklahoma City? I'm pretty sure they have one sitting there.
Thatguy
Visit this Community
Virginia, United States
Joined: November 09, 2008
KitMaker: 487 posts
Armorama: 451 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 - 01:32 AM UTC
The M386 used the M139F chassis. Its not entirely clear how this differed from the M139C/D chassis used for the M289. There was also a proposed multifuel M139A2F.

While the pictures aren't always great, I would recommend the monographs on the system available here: http://www.redstone.army.mil/history/pdf/welcome.html
Frenchy
Visit this Community
Rhone, France
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 - 04:31 AM UTC
I've forgotten that there's a M386 walkaround on Maquetland.com. The pictured vehicle is a French one at the Draguignan museum. Just click on "telecharger" below the M386 thumbnail to download 31 pics :
http://maquetland.com/v2/index.php?page=photos&c=char

HTH

Frenchy
pfc
#333
Visit this Community
Oklahoma, United States
Joined: October 13, 2002
KitMaker: 1,017 posts
Armorama: 752 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 - 06:31 AM UTC
Thanks for the pics and links Frenchy and Joe yall have been very helpfull.

Quoted Text

Looking at the truck, it's not a 5 ton. Looks more like the old 10 ton wrecker chassis


Reading through the PDF file link that Frenchy posted I found that M-386 was a 5 ton M-139 type truck still not sure of the modifications except that it bigger wheels and a 115v generator.

Quoted Text

have you seen the one at the 45th infantry museum in Oklahoma City


I have some pics of that one but cant seem to find them they have a nice collection of AFV's and armour.
KurtLaughlin
Visit this Community
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: January 18, 2003
KitMaker: 2,402 posts
Armorama: 2,377 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 - 01:28 PM UTC
Here's the photo link you want:

http://www.primeportal.net/artillery/david_lueck/m50_honest_john_on_m289_launcher/

The most recent issue of MMiR has an HJ article.

The RSA monograph is a good overall history but there's really only a few useful points in it. The main thing was that there were really three launcher configurations: XM289, M289, and M386. If you have the old 1/40 Adams/Life-Like kit, it's the XM289 which was the configuration of the first 28 launchers or so. The XM289 used the M139C, the M289 the M139D, and the M386 the M139F. When looking at photos and stuff you need to keep the XM289 and M289 separate. The easiest ID point is the bumper mounted launcher support. The XM289 support is shorter and the M289 support has bolted joint in the middle.

You should try to find the TMs. They have them at the Army Historical Center in Carlisle PA. They also have those for the rockets, the warheads, and the launcher trailer.

That will be a heck of a scratchbuild. It's not a simple gizmo.

KL
Thatguy
Visit this Community
Virginia, United States
Joined: November 09, 2008
KitMaker: 487 posts
Armorama: 451 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 - 01:53 PM UTC

Quoted Text

The RSA monograph is a good overall history but there's really only a few useful points in it. The main thing was that there were really three launcher configurations: XM289, M289, and M386. If you have the old 1/40 Adams/Life-Like kit, it's the XM289 which was the configuration of the first 28 launchers or so. The XM289 used the M139C, the M289 the M139D, and the M386 the M139F. When looking at photos and stuff you need to keep the XM289 and M289 separate. The easiest ID point is the bumper mounted launcher support. The XM289 support is shorter and the M289 support has bolted joint in the middle.


Its a bit more complicated than that. The AMCOM monograph specific notes three XM289 subvariants. The first XM289 (originally designated the T135) used a modified XM139 chassis, and featured a still different model of front support assembly. The second XM289 featured the original unbraced front support. The third, featuring lightweight jacks and a shorter rail (ala the XM386/M386) was eventually designated the XM289E1 and not standardized.

The monograph suggests that early M289s were just the second variant, as the M139D chassis isn't even mentioned, and purchase of M139Cs for the M289 is mentioned. I'd suspect that still poor cross country performance (noted with the T135 or XM289-1 as its referred to in the monograph) with the unbraced support led to modifications and the substitution of the M139D chassis. The M139D chassis isn't mentioned in the monograph on the Improved Honest John either.
trickymissfit
Joined: October 03, 2007
KitMaker: 1,388 posts
Armorama: 1,357 posts
Posted: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 - 07:33 PM UTC

Quoted Text

Thanks for the pics and links Frenchy and Joe yall have been very helpfull.

Quoted Text

Looking at the truck, it's not a 5 ton. Looks more like the old 10 ton wrecker chassis


Reading through the PDF file link that Frenchy posted I found that M-386 was a 5 ton M-139 type truck still not sure of the modifications except that it bigger wheels and a 115v generator.

Quoted Text

have you seen the one at the 45th infantry museum in Oklahoma City


I have some pics of that one but cant seem to find them they have a nice collection of AFV's and armour.



there's a 5 ton parked near that Honest John truck, and the first thing I noticed was how much heavier it looked. Also a 5 ton uses 10 x 20 tires while the honest john used 14 x 20 tires. Maybe it's just a beefed up 5 ton. A ten ton wrecker looks a lot like a five ton till you get the two beside each other. The ten ton is built much heavier all the way thru. Yet the cab and front end look identical.
gary
ddoyle
Visit this Community
United States
Joined: November 27, 2008
KitMaker: 31 posts
Armorama: 30 posts
Posted: Friday, January 09, 2009 - 01:08 PM UTC

Quoted Text


there's a 5 ton parked near that Honest John truck, and the first thing I noticed was how much heavier it looked. Also a 5 ton uses 10 x 20 tires while the honest john used 14 x 20 tires. Maybe it's just a beefed up 5 ton. A ten ton wrecker looks a lot like a five ton till you get the two beside each other. The ten ton is built much heavier all the way thru. Yet the cab and front end look identical.
gary



The M139 was originally developed as the basis of the M328 bridge transporter. It is a five ton 6x6 with 14.00-20 tires. In order to accomodate these tires there are spacers used on the front wheels. All the steel wheels on the truck are different from those on the 5-ton cargo trucks as well. My dad has one of these vehicles, so I am fairly familiar with them. I have a M123A1C ten-ton, which has a MUCH more substantial suspension and frame, as well as using even larger 14.00-24 tires. Other than the cab tub and the "family resemblence" the two trucks have nothing in common.

The various chassis used for the Honest John (M139C, M139D and M139F) differed in the differential gear ratios, lacking a front winch, have support rods welded beneath the front axle and other minor changes. I did a pretty long (six page) article with lots of photos for MMiR 45 (the most recent one).

The Honest John launcher is something of a favorite vehicle of mine - drop me a note if you need info or photos not included in the article.

Best wishes,
David Doyle
pfc
#333
Visit this Community
Oklahoma, United States
Joined: October 13, 2002
KitMaker: 1,017 posts
Armorama: 752 posts
Posted: Friday, January 09, 2009 - 03:59 PM UTC
Thanks David, I will probably have some questions on down the road possibly pics also. Appreciate you offering me help. Im kinda stumped at the moment trying to figure out how Im going to scratchbuild the 14.00-20 tires. I dont think Im going to be able to use 14.00-24 M123 wheels from Tank Workshop.
trickymissfit
Joined: October 03, 2007
KitMaker: 1,388 posts
Armorama: 1,357 posts
Posted: Friday, January 09, 2009 - 08:07 PM UTC

Quoted Text


Quoted Text


there's a 5 ton parked near that Honest John truck, and the first thing I noticed was how much heavier it looked. Also a 5 ton uses 10 x 20 tires while the honest john used 14 x 20 tires. Maybe it's just a beefed up 5 ton. A ten ton wrecker looks a lot like a five ton till you get the two beside each other. The ten ton is built much heavier all the way thru. Yet the cab and front end look identical.
gary



The M139 was originally developed as the basis of the M328 bridge transporter. It is a five ton 6x6 with 14.00-20 tires. In order to accomodate these tires there are spacers used on the front wheels. All the steel wheels on the truck are different from those on the 5-ton cargo trucks as well. My dad has one of these vehicles, so I am fairly familiar with them. I have a M123A1C ten-ton, which has a MUCH more substantial suspension and frame, as well as using even larger 14.00-24 tires. Other than the cab tub and the "family resemblence" the two trucks have nothing in common.

The various chassis used for the Honest John (M139C, M139D and M139F) differed in the differential gear ratios, lacking a front winch, have support rods welded beneath the front axle and other minor changes. I did a pretty long (six page) article with lots of photos for MMiR 45 (the most recent one).

The Honest John launcher is something of a favorite vehicle of mine - drop me a note if you need info or photos not included in the article.

Best wishes,
David Doyle



from what you posted your probably right. It's just that this truck looked so massive.
gary
trickymissfit
Joined: October 03, 2007
KitMaker: 1,388 posts
Armorama: 1,357 posts
Posted: Friday, January 09, 2009 - 08:12 PM UTC

Quoted Text

Thanks David, I will probably have some questions on down the road possibly pics also. Appreciate you offering me help. Im kinda stumped at the moment trying to figure out how Im going to scratchbuild the 14.00-20 tires. I dont think Im going to be able to use 14.00-24 M123 wheels from Tank Workshop.



The truck used the same size tires as on the 8" howitzer, but the rims are different. I suppose a guy could resin cast a set of tires and maybe modify the the rims to fit. I have an 8" towed howitzer somewhere in my stash, and I'll take a look at whatkind of wheels and tires it comes with. The one near me uses an automotive tread pattern while the Honest John truck uses standard all terrane tread patterns.
gary
ddoyle
Visit this Community
United States
Joined: November 27, 2008
KitMaker: 31 posts
Armorama: 30 posts
Posted: Saturday, January 10, 2009 - 12:37 AM UTC

Quoted Text

Thanks David, I will probably have some questions on down the road possibly pics also. Appreciate you offering me help. Im kinda stumped at the moment trying to figure out how Im going to scratchbuild the 14.00-20 tires. I dont think Im going to be able to use 14.00-24 M123 wheels from Tank Workshop.



Unfortunately, while some of my writing is for this market, I don't build myself (my hobby is collecting and restoring vehicles) - but I do try to keep up with coming kit releases. The TIRE used on the V100 is the same size as that of the M139 - but the real V100 used the "Commando Special" tire, which has a special tread pattern. The WHEEL used on the V100 was not the same as that of the M139, as the V100 used 2 1/2 ton truck axles, not the five ton axles, which have more lug nuts and, IIRC a different offset. The V150 used 5 ton axles and wheels, and the same 14.00-220 size tire - but not all had the Commando Special tread. Does anyone offer a V150 - and how accurate is their representation of the tires and wheels? Is the Hobby Boss V100 tire tread a Commando Special pattern, or a ND tread? If the later, presumably you could use that in conjunction with the centers from the Italeri M923 shelter carrier (NOT "bigfoot") rims.

HTH,
David
m75
Visit this Community
California, United States
Joined: July 20, 2002
KitMaker: 666 posts
Armorama: 661 posts
Posted: Saturday, January 10, 2009 - 10:42 AM UTC
The HonnyBoss V-100 tires have the correct pattern for the Commando Specials, but do not appear to have the more "squared-off" tread shape when compared to period photos. It escapes me at the moment, but the latest Squadron Models flyer has a resin set to replace the HobbyBoss tires, and these have the "Commando Special" markings on the sidewalls.
m75
Visit this Community
California, United States
Joined: July 20, 2002
KitMaker: 666 posts
Armorama: 661 posts
Posted: Saturday, January 10, 2009 - 10:44 AM UTC
By the way, the Redstone Arsenal reference photos showed several photos of a GOER that was configured to carry the Nike Herc. THAT would be an interesting build! Just having a GOER would be great, come to think of it............
ddoyle
Visit this Community
United States
Joined: November 27, 2008
KitMaker: 31 posts
Armorama: 30 posts
Posted: Saturday, January 10, 2009 - 05:16 PM UTC

Quoted Text

The HonnyBoss V-100 tires have the correct pattern for the Commando Specials......



Well, then, what about a Staghound? The Staghound utilized 14.00-20 tires as well, but again, I don't know what the kit provides as far as tread pattern. And again, this doesn't address the wheels, but only the tires.

Regards,
David
 _GOTOTOP