Alan McNeilly provides an In-Box Review of Resicast's AOP Carrier Mk I Conversion for the Tamiya Universal Carrier, a multi-media set in 1/35.
Link to Item
If you have comments or questions please post them here.
Thanks!
Armor/AFV
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
Hosted by Darren Baker, Mario Matijasic
REVIEW
Resicast AOP Carrier Mk Ic5flies
California, United States
Joined: October 21, 2007
KitMaker: 3,684 posts
Armorama: 2,938 posts
Joined: October 21, 2007
KitMaker: 3,684 posts
Armorama: 2,938 posts
Posted: Saturday, January 31, 2009 - 04:19 PM UTC
Posted: Sunday, February 01, 2009 - 09:20 AM UTC
Hi James,
thanks for getting this one up given all the gallery problems.
Al
A universal carrier of the Royal Horse Artillery tows a captured German staff car and captured swastika flags, near Argentan, 21 August 1944.
Not quite an AOP but...........
Al
thanks for getting this one up given all the gallery problems.
Al
A universal carrier of the Royal Horse Artillery tows a captured German staff car and captured swastika flags, near Argentan, 21 August 1944.
Not quite an AOP but...........
Al
jjumbo
British Columbia, Canada
Joined: August 27, 2006
KitMaker: 2,012 posts
Armorama: 1,949 posts
Joined: August 27, 2006
KitMaker: 2,012 posts
Armorama: 1,949 posts
Posted: Sunday, February 01, 2009 - 09:33 AM UTC
Hey Al,
Another interesting review !!
Glad to hear that Resicast have made the instructions and part identification better.
The vague instructions have always put me off getting one of resin conversions.
Cheers
jjumbo
Another interesting review !!
Glad to hear that Resicast have made the instructions and part identification better.
The vague instructions have always put me off getting one of resin conversions.
Cheers
jjumbo
Posted: Sunday, February 01, 2009 - 09:45 AM UTC
Hi John,
Yes, I like the new style of instructions. This will be an interesting build.
Al
Yes, I like the new style of instructions. This will be an interesting build.
Al
newfish
England - West Midlands, United Kingdom
Joined: June 23, 2008
KitMaker: 2,329 posts
Armorama: 2,110 posts
Joined: June 23, 2008
KitMaker: 2,329 posts
Armorama: 2,110 posts
Posted: Sunday, February 01, 2009 - 09:54 AM UTC
Great Review Al I think im going to buy one as my first resin conversion
:)
:)
DT61
Ontario, Canada
Joined: September 18, 2005
KitMaker: 1,226 posts
Armorama: 819 posts
Joined: September 18, 2005
KitMaker: 1,226 posts
Armorama: 819 posts
Posted: Sunday, February 01, 2009 - 11:55 AM UTC
Great review Alan. it looks like a great conversion set.
Darryl
Darryl
Posted: Sunday, February 01, 2009 - 06:36 PM UTC
Hi James, Darrel,
Thanks guys, glad you found it useful.
Al
Thanks guys, glad you found it useful.
Al
Posted: Thursday, February 05, 2009 - 06:54 AM UTC
Hi Guys,
A couple of references for this one:
Can anyone add any more?
thanks
Al
A couple of references for this one:
Can anyone add any more?
thanks
Al
Posted: Friday, February 20, 2009 - 01:45 AM UTC
Anyone got any more pics of this one either in Italy or NWE?
Thanks
Al
Thanks
Al
bill_c
Campaigns Administrator
New Jersey, United States
Joined: January 09, 2008
KitMaker: 10,553 posts
Armorama: 8,109 posts
Joined: January 09, 2008
KitMaker: 10,553 posts
Armorama: 8,109 posts
Posted: Friday, February 20, 2009 - 05:49 AM UTC
Bully review, Alan!
My question would be:
Of all the various versions of the Tamiya kit one can build, which one yields the best overall results? I thought, for example, that the Bren carrier looked awesome except for the Bren itself, which lacked the crisp detailing of a metal-upgraded MG. And then there's the question of "buildability." Which one goes together the nicest? It would seem from your review the AOP is the ticket.
My question would be:
Of all the various versions of the Tamiya kit one can build, which one yields the best overall results? I thought, for example, that the Bren carrier looked awesome except for the Bren itself, which lacked the crisp detailing of a metal-upgraded MG. And then there's the question of "buildability." Which one goes together the nicest? It would seem from your review the AOP is the ticket.
Posted: Friday, February 20, 2009 - 09:49 AM UTC
Hi Bill,
I've enjoyed them all so far. The AOP carrier is possibly the most unusual with the full engine build to look forward to. I'll stick pretty much to the rear build sequence something I've altered in all the others, so yes, it was the first one I spotted but the last one I bought.
The quality of the parts has always been excellent with the one exception of the slightly short engine block in the Mk I set I think, but sure fixing it up was all part of modelling. The new instructions are very good overall so it really depends if you want one for a specific setting or something more roving like the AOP.
I've still got the 3" mtr version to have a look at, but the AOP might possibly be the most interesting of them all. I haven't used the Platoon Infantry sets, but all the sets seem to offer a number of possible finishes and styles, giving good choise of finish.
Buildability was good in all the sets I've tried so far, but even with a basic set of new tracks you can still do a nice job on the basic Tamiya kit, with a little bit of imagination.
Kinda take your pic, I have no favourite as I like this vehicle, it was used by just about everybody, everywhere. If you have an old one you could do a gutted carrier, now there's a thought lol, lol.
Cheers
Al
I've enjoyed them all so far. The AOP carrier is possibly the most unusual with the full engine build to look forward to. I'll stick pretty much to the rear build sequence something I've altered in all the others, so yes, it was the first one I spotted but the last one I bought.
The quality of the parts has always been excellent with the one exception of the slightly short engine block in the Mk I set I think, but sure fixing it up was all part of modelling. The new instructions are very good overall so it really depends if you want one for a specific setting or something more roving like the AOP.
I've still got the 3" mtr version to have a look at, but the AOP might possibly be the most interesting of them all. I haven't used the Platoon Infantry sets, but all the sets seem to offer a number of possible finishes and styles, giving good choise of finish.
Buildability was good in all the sets I've tried so far, but even with a basic set of new tracks you can still do a nice job on the basic Tamiya kit, with a little bit of imagination.
Kinda take your pic, I have no favourite as I like this vehicle, it was used by just about everybody, everywhere. If you have an old one you could do a gutted carrier, now there's a thought lol, lol.
Cheers
Al
Posted: Thursday, March 05, 2009 - 04:17 AM UTC
Hi Guys,
I'll go for 3rd time lucky here. Anyone got any further reference pics of this one?
Many thanks
Al
I'll go for 3rd time lucky here. Anyone got any further reference pics of this one?
Many thanks
Al