Hi Guys been on this on since before Christmas, so it's nice to get it Finished..sort of.
It's the AFV Club Churchill Mk III, with minor additions and the Hobbyfan resin set of stowage and front skirt. Done as a Kingforce tank on it's way back to Alexandria after Victory at El Alamein, i call the scene.."The End of The Beginning." after a a quote from Winston Churchill following the Victory.
Thanks to Kevin Tucker and Gordon Brown (from Cromwell Models) who both sent me an auxilary fuel tank for the Churchill,
Thanks also to Paul Thompson at just-bases.co.uk for making me a nice Oak base, to my own sizes, it's a beauty.
More pictures and a build article will appear in a future issue of Scale Military Modeller International magazine.
Paul
Hosted by Darren Baker
Churchill III, "The End of the Beginning"
paulchatfield
England - South West, United Kingdom
Joined: May 27, 2008
KitMaker: 144 posts
Armorama: 136 posts
Joined: May 27, 2008
KitMaker: 144 posts
Armorama: 136 posts
Posted: Saturday, February 21, 2009 - 05:18 AM UTC
jimbrae
Provincia de Lugo, Spain / Espaņa
Joined: April 23, 2003
KitMaker: 12,927 posts
Armorama: 9,486 posts
Joined: April 23, 2003
KitMaker: 12,927 posts
Armorama: 9,486 posts
Posted: Saturday, February 21, 2009 - 06:09 AM UTC
REALLY impressive work Paul. Nice, simple arrangement which works and convinces and the same time... I particularly like the stowage though, that is a really nice set.
Thanks for posting it!
Thanks for posting it!
Posted: Saturday, February 21, 2009 - 06:09 AM UTC
Hi Paul,
Really nice work, turned out a treat, Churchill looks great, I like the strike mark on the side of the turret.
Excellent stuff. Only observation; I would add a little dust to the stowage, help give the tarps a little variation in colour and maybe a little more on the front skirt too as it would be pretty dusty there. They (the stowage) look a bit clean compared to the rest of the tank. I do like what you have added and the way in which it is tied down.
I don't quite get the relationship between the figures, They look very good but there is no interaction between them for a parked vehicle, if you kow what I mean.
The map on the top looks like it needs an owner, but as this is a preview I dare say there is more to come
Really impressive build.
Al
Really nice work, turned out a treat, Churchill looks great, I like the strike mark on the side of the turret.
Excellent stuff. Only observation; I would add a little dust to the stowage, help give the tarps a little variation in colour and maybe a little more on the front skirt too as it would be pretty dusty there. They (the stowage) look a bit clean compared to the rest of the tank. I do like what you have added and the way in which it is tied down.
I don't quite get the relationship between the figures, They look very good but there is no interaction between them for a parked vehicle, if you kow what I mean.
The map on the top looks like it needs an owner, but as this is a preview I dare say there is more to come
Really impressive build.
Al
paulchatfield
England - South West, United Kingdom
Joined: May 27, 2008
KitMaker: 144 posts
Armorama: 136 posts
Joined: May 27, 2008
KitMaker: 144 posts
Armorama: 136 posts
Posted: Saturday, February 21, 2009 - 06:28 AM UTC
Quoted Text
. I particularly like the stowage though, that is a really nice set.
Thanks Jim, i agree it's a nice set, very well cast, with only a couple of little bubbles.
It is matched exactly to the rear deck of the AFV Churchill, to the point were there are slots and dents in the back that corrispond with hinges,handles, panel line etc.
Thanks for the positive feedback Jim
paul
paulchatfield
England - South West, United Kingdom
Joined: May 27, 2008
KitMaker: 144 posts
Armorama: 136 posts
Joined: May 27, 2008
KitMaker: 144 posts
Armorama: 136 posts
Posted: Saturday, February 21, 2009 - 06:37 AM UTC
Quoted Text
I don't quite get the relationship between the figures, They look very good but there is no interaction between them for a parked vehicle, if you kow what I mean.
The map on the top looks like it needs an owner, but as this is a preview I dare say there is more to come
Hi Al, i also think the figures are a weak point, the orginal idea was that matey at the front would be up checking the map. I (foolishly) glued the map down before check that he would convincingly lean on the bin. When i built him he missed the bin by a long way
So not wanting to ruin the paintwork on the top of the bin i left the map and put him down at the front checking damage. the idea now is that both guys have heard something (maybe an explosion) and are looking in it's dirrection. A feeble excuse i know but i'll do for now
I now really need to get another Figure to put with the map, hence the "Sort of", after claiming it was finished.
There is actually laying pigment dust on the front skirt and the plate behind it but it doesn't show in the pictures. The rear stowage may get another going over though.
Thanks for the positve critique Al, always welcome.
paul
Posted: Saturday, February 21, 2009 - 06:45 AM UTC
Very nice work Paul, perhaps you could send us a feature for this one.
Posted: Saturday, February 21, 2009 - 07:37 AM UTC
Hi Paul,
Yes, pictures they tend to do that with dust. One of the new seated figures might work on the turret, I'm thinking the one from the HobbyFan crew and/or the more recently releases one from Alpine. There is a Resicast figure, bent at the waste who would also probably work. You didn't by chance use PVA on the map - you could wet it and it would come off OK?
If you rub a couple of different light colours into the stowage it should create a nice contrast and dusty look.
The Churchill it'self looks spot on, one of the best I've seen and it'sa good simple base to display it.
Cheers
Al
Yes, pictures they tend to do that with dust. One of the new seated figures might work on the turret, I'm thinking the one from the HobbyFan crew and/or the more recently releases one from Alpine. There is a Resicast figure, bent at the waste who would also probably work. You didn't by chance use PVA on the map - you could wet it and it would come off OK?
If you rub a couple of different light colours into the stowage it should create a nice contrast and dusty look.
The Churchill it'self looks spot on, one of the best I've seen and it'sa good simple base to display it.
Cheers
Al
DaveCox
England - South East, United Kingdom
Joined: January 11, 2003
KitMaker: 4,307 posts
Armorama: 2,130 posts
Joined: January 11, 2003
KitMaker: 4,307 posts
Armorama: 2,130 posts
Posted: Saturday, February 21, 2009 - 11:02 AM UTC
Nice one Paul, great example of one of my favourite tanks......I've never seen it in that colourscheme before, really suits it.
pebblemonkey
England - West Midlands, United Kingdom
Joined: January 26, 2009
KitMaker: 180 posts
Armorama: 151 posts
Joined: January 26, 2009
KitMaker: 180 posts
Armorama: 151 posts
Posted: Saturday, February 21, 2009 - 12:43 PM UTC
Hi paul,
Great model, it looks like its just been unloaded from the scammel tank transporter and the crew have neatly folded their bedding and tents onto the tank.
Very impressive.
Matt
Great model, it looks like its just been unloaded from the scammel tank transporter and the crew have neatly folded their bedding and tents onto the tank.
Very impressive.
Matt
PantherF
Indiana, United States
Joined: June 10, 2005
KitMaker: 6,188 posts
Armorama: 5,960 posts
Joined: June 10, 2005
KitMaker: 6,188 posts
Armorama: 5,960 posts
Posted: Saturday, February 21, 2009 - 01:27 PM UTC
Great looking tank. This may be a dumb question, but what is the purpose of the front skirt? Is it deployed (in use) right now?
neil22
Cotes-d`Armor, France
Joined: August 12, 2007
KitMaker: 292 posts
Armorama: 281 posts
Joined: August 12, 2007
KitMaker: 292 posts
Armorama: 281 posts
Posted: Saturday, February 21, 2009 - 11:16 PM UTC
i belive the front skirt was to keep the dust down abit so the driver could see where he is going.
cheers
neil
cheers
neil
paulchatfield
England - South West, United Kingdom
Joined: May 27, 2008
KitMaker: 144 posts
Armorama: 136 posts
Joined: May 27, 2008
KitMaker: 144 posts
Armorama: 136 posts
Posted: Saturday, February 21, 2009 - 11:45 PM UTC
Quoted Text
but what is the purpose of the front skirt? Is it deployed (in use) right now?
Hi as neil says, above, it was an attempt to keep the huge dust clouds down (in desert sand) so the drivers view wasn't completely obscured. My understanding is that it was only a partial success and that after some experimentation, after El Alamein, they found that removing the front fenders was more effective.
Paul
Posted: Sunday, February 22, 2009 - 12:23 AM UTC
Wow, really nice model! Seems very much alive.
How did you make the map? It adds a lot to the model
How did you make the map? It adds a lot to the model
soprano54
England - East Anglia, United Kingdom
Joined: March 25, 2006
KitMaker: 18 posts
Armorama: 17 posts
Joined: March 25, 2006
KitMaker: 18 posts
Armorama: 17 posts
Posted: Sunday, February 22, 2009 - 01:48 AM UTC
Nice model, I wouldn't be inclined to stow all that canvas on the back decks though! On a real tank the engine/transmission would very quickly overheat!
jimbrae
Provincia de Lugo, Spain / Espaņa
Joined: April 23, 2003
KitMaker: 12,927 posts
Armorama: 9,486 posts
Joined: April 23, 2003
KitMaker: 12,927 posts
Armorama: 9,486 posts
Posted: Sunday, February 22, 2009 - 02:03 AM UTC
Quoted Text
I wouldn't be inclined to stow all that canvas on the back decks though! On a real tank the engin/transmission would very quickly overheat!
Emmm, the contemporary images of Churchill IIIs in King Force, show this quantity of stowage and more... In fact, i'm pretty sure the designers of this set used the same photos...
soprano54
England - East Anglia, United Kingdom
Joined: March 25, 2006
KitMaker: 18 posts
Armorama: 17 posts
Joined: March 25, 2006
KitMaker: 18 posts
Armorama: 17 posts
Posted: Sunday, February 22, 2009 - 03:31 AM UTC
I'll just have to take your word for it, I had a look at the said website and I'm still not convinced.
paulchatfield
England - South West, United Kingdom
Joined: May 27, 2008
KitMaker: 144 posts
Armorama: 136 posts
Joined: May 27, 2008
KitMaker: 144 posts
Armorama: 136 posts
Posted: Sunday, February 22, 2009 - 03:51 AM UTC
Quoted Text
How did you make the map? It adds a lot to the model
that one comes from verlinden, and old set, so i'm not sure if it's still in production
paul
BornToDig
Maryland, United States
Joined: December 25, 2002
KitMaker: 345 posts
Armorama: 311 posts
Joined: December 25, 2002
KitMaker: 345 posts
Armorama: 311 posts
Posted: Sunday, February 22, 2009 - 04:14 AM UTC
The tarps and rolls look amazing. I thought you had used actual cloth until I read otherwise. Can you explain how you painted them?
paulchatfield
England - South West, United Kingdom
Joined: May 27, 2008
KitMaker: 144 posts
Armorama: 136 posts
Joined: May 27, 2008
KitMaker: 144 posts
Armorama: 136 posts
Posted: Sunday, February 22, 2009 - 04:23 AM UTC
Quoted Text
On a real tank the engine/transmission would very quickly overheat!
The engine bay is forward of exhaust outlets. it is partially under the turret bin. At the rear is the gearbox and no vents are blocked by the stowage, as you can see, so i can't see over heating as a problem.
My thoughts on it anyway.
cheers
Paul
paulchatfield
England - South West, United Kingdom
Joined: May 27, 2008
KitMaker: 144 posts
Armorama: 136 posts
Joined: May 27, 2008
KitMaker: 144 posts
Armorama: 136 posts
Posted: Sunday, February 22, 2009 - 04:28 AM UTC
Quoted Text
The tarps and rolls look amazing. I thought you had used actual cloth until I read otherwise. Can you explain how you painted them?
Hi
I painted them with vallejo acrylics, mixing khaki with OD and deck tan to vary the shades. I then painted the ties in plain deck tan and once dried i ran a little wash of Burnt Umber oils into the cracks and folds. After that two brush painted coats of Lifecolor Mat Varnish gave a really nice flat finish like cloth. No special treatment. When sculpting is as fine and realistic as it is in this set, painting is a lot easier.
Cheers
paul
pebblemonkey
England - West Midlands, United Kingdom
Joined: January 26, 2009
KitMaker: 180 posts
Armorama: 151 posts
Joined: January 26, 2009
KitMaker: 180 posts
Armorama: 151 posts
Posted: Sunday, February 22, 2009 - 08:20 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Quoted Textbut what is the purpose of the front skirt? Is it deployed (in use) right now?
Hi as neil says, above, it was an attempt to keep the huge dust clouds down (in desert sand) so the drivers view wasn't completely obscured. My understanding is that it was only a partial success and that after some experimentation, after El Alamein, they found that removing the front fenders was more effective.
Paul
Hi Both,
According to the manual, the Churchill had two large Sirocco fans which cooled the engine, these fans when the vehicle was standing still on loose dirt, would raise a whirlwind underneath the belly of the tank and then blow a dustcloud and dirt through all the opened hatches.
The screen was to stop the dirt going around the front of the tank and filling the driver's compartment.
Matt
soprano54
England - East Anglia, United Kingdom
Joined: March 25, 2006
KitMaker: 18 posts
Armorama: 17 posts
Joined: March 25, 2006
KitMaker: 18 posts
Armorama: 17 posts
Posted: Sunday, February 22, 2009 - 09:07 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Quoted TextOn a real tank the engine/transmission would very quickly overheat!
The engine bay is forward of exhaust outlets. it is partially under the turret bin. At the rear is the gearbox and no vents are blocked by the stowage, as you can see, so i can't see over heating as a problem.
My thoughts on it anyway.
cheers
Paul
Yeah I can now see why, having seen a few pics of a 'clean' Churchill, apologies!
biffa
Tennessee, United States
Joined: September 07, 2005
KitMaker: 881 posts
Armorama: 826 posts
Joined: September 07, 2005
KitMaker: 881 posts
Armorama: 826 posts
Posted: Sunday, February 22, 2009 - 11:02 AM UTC
Simply beautiful Paul i love the painting and weathering the painting of the stowage is as good as i have ever seen i love it.
Ron.
Ron.