No criticism Of Jim Rae particularly, but I must say- anyone who REALLY BUILDS these things shouldn't depend on "first look"- type reports. All they manage is to verify whether a few dimensions are accurate, whether the wheel is the proper type for the variant, etc. NO WHERE CAN THEY SPEAK TO HOW HARD OR EASY THE KITS ARE TO BUILD!
Some years back, on the strength of a "first look", I was induced to build AFV Club's M10 w/17 lb. gun "Achilles." Oh, it's accurate, but it was a NIGHTMARE to assemble- so many heavy sprue connections, and the instructions had to be vigorously interpreted to avoid errors. Further, it lacked much interior detail- something not possible to realize just by perusing the frets. Likewise with the Dingo I built, though the sprue connection points were easier to clean up.
The killer is that AFV Club, MiniArt, Dragon's "smart kits", Tristar, and others are highly regarded companies that routinely boast value-added detail, but brother! If it isn't quick, shoddy engineering, it's unintelligible instructions. Small wonder Tamiya continues to rate so highly- sure, we'd all like to see more from them, but what we get practically falls together on its own, by comparison.
I appreciate that there's been an explosion of new kits in recent years- so many that it'd be hard to cover them adequately by traditional build-and-review. It's naturally tempting for the expert to comment on the parts as viewed on the frets. But I respectfully assert this is no service to the modeler. Nothing personal, Jim, I say this everywhere. If we don't speak up, the companies will inevitably throw us anything at any price- hoping the boxes stay unopened in our collection closets.
Kristoffer