Dragon Models have just announced their latest, 1/35th scale figure set. Scheduled for release in June 2009, this is DML's latest figure offering: DRA 6513 - Winter Tank Riders 1943-44. The News Report can be seen:
Link to Item
If you have comments or questions please post them here.
Thanks!
Figures
Military figures of all shapes and sizes.
Military figures of all shapes and sizes.
Hosted by Darren Baker, Mario Matijasic
NEWS
DML - New Winter Tank Rider Figuresjimbrae
Provincia de Lugo, Spain / Espaņa
Joined: April 23, 2003
KitMaker: 12,927 posts
Armorama: 9,486 posts
Joined: April 23, 2003
KitMaker: 12,927 posts
Armorama: 9,486 posts
Posted: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 - 10:40 PM UTC
dispatcher
Illinois, United States
Joined: November 04, 2007
KitMaker: 396 posts
Armorama: 325 posts
Joined: November 04, 2007
KitMaker: 396 posts
Armorama: 325 posts
Posted: Thursday, May 14, 2009 - 02:10 AM UTC
Looks like a nice set of figures. I think they would fit in well with the korsun pocket set # 6273. Enough of these sets and I think parts can be used to make new poses.
Joe
Joe
horsegunner
Ontario, Canada
Joined: January 05, 2005
KitMaker: 347 posts
Armorama: 47 posts
Joined: January 05, 2005
KitMaker: 347 posts
Armorama: 47 posts
Posted: Thursday, May 14, 2009 - 03:50 AM UTC
Ho-Hum, another boring set of German figures. Why can't we get a set of Commonwealth tank riders from this manufacturer? I mean, every other manufacturer is taking care of the Allied forces much better than Dragon/DML.
Just my nickels worth of thoughts......
Art
Just my nickels worth of thoughts......
Art
jimbrae
Provincia de Lugo, Spain / Espaņa
Joined: April 23, 2003
KitMaker: 12,927 posts
Armorama: 9,486 posts
Joined: April 23, 2003
KitMaker: 12,927 posts
Armorama: 9,486 posts
Posted: Thursday, May 14, 2009 - 04:50 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Ho-Hum, another boring set of German figures. Why can't we get a set of Commonwealth tank riders from this manufacturer? I mean, every other manufacturer is taking care of the Allied forces much better than Dragon/DML.
Firstly, I rarely do anything Axis (apart from the Tiger I), and perhaps i'm not the most indicated to defend DML but i'll give it a try.
1) It's Not a 'boring set' of figures at all, IMO, it's possibly one of the most useful sets DML has announced for a while. Good mixture of uniform types etc.
2) With their new Pz IV series, it makes sense to maximise their appeal - doing a 'dedicated' set is a good idea. Did anyone criticize AFV Club when they produced appropriate sets for their Churchillls?
3) The animation of these figures is a HUGE step in the right direction for DML.
4) German sells...
5) Allied Tank Riders? You should use the News Section on this network. MiniArt announced a set back in february.
6) There ARE shortcomings in DML's approach to Allied figures - however, their recent Commonwealth Infantry set is going to fill a lot of gaps. They aren't being as 'proactive' as others but they aren't ignoring Allied either..
acav
Auckland, New Zealand
Joined: May 09, 2002
KitMaker: 517 posts
Armorama: 290 posts
Joined: May 09, 2002
KitMaker: 517 posts
Armorama: 290 posts
Posted: Thursday, May 14, 2009 - 10:01 AM UTC
This can't be from Dragon - where's the pointing officer..?
jafad
Scotland, United Kingdom
Joined: December 02, 2004
KitMaker: 230 posts
Armorama: 177 posts
Joined: December 02, 2004
KitMaker: 230 posts
Armorama: 177 posts
Posted: Thursday, May 14, 2009 - 10:02 AM UTC
I was wondering if these are Gen 2 standard figures?
muchachos
Ontario, Canada
Joined: May 21, 2008
KitMaker: 537 posts
Armorama: 439 posts
Joined: May 21, 2008
KitMaker: 537 posts
Armorama: 439 posts
Posted: Thursday, May 14, 2009 - 01:24 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Ho-Hum, another boring set of German figures. Why can't we get a set of Commonwealth tank riders from this manufacturer? I mean, every other manufacturer is taking care of the Allied forces much better than Dragon/DML.
Just my nickels worth of thoughts......
Art
Hasn't DML done most of the allied figure releases? At least, that's how it seems in my LHS...
This set looks like one of their most useful in a while. Gary, If it was Gen2, theyd probably be bragging about it more.
SCOTT
jimbrae
Provincia de Lugo, Spain / Espaņa
Joined: April 23, 2003
KitMaker: 12,927 posts
Armorama: 9,486 posts
Joined: April 23, 2003
KitMaker: 12,927 posts
Armorama: 9,486 posts
Posted: Thursday, May 14, 2009 - 09:33 PM UTC
No, the set ISN'T Gen2. If it was, it would have been mentioned. The weapons and equipment though WILL almost certainly be those which were developed for the German Gen2 sets. It now seems to be standard practice to include these in ALL German sets..
Theoldun
England - East Anglia, United Kingdom
Joined: May 13, 2006
KitMaker: 9 posts
Armorama: 9 posts
Joined: May 13, 2006
KitMaker: 9 posts
Armorama: 9 posts
Posted: Friday, May 15, 2009 - 02:15 AM UTC
Looks a good set, uniforms have a different mix
they should sit well on a mark 4 or panther.
they should sit well on a mark 4 or panther.
DAK66
Tennessee, United States
Joined: April 28, 2006
KitMaker: 286 posts
Armorama: 120 posts
Joined: April 28, 2006
KitMaker: 286 posts
Armorama: 120 posts
Posted: Sunday, May 17, 2009 - 07:34 AM UTC
This is awesome stuff i only wish that Taesung from Alpine would have come up with this .
alanmac
United Kingdom
Joined: February 25, 2007
KitMaker: 3,033 posts
Armorama: 2,953 posts
Joined: February 25, 2007
KitMaker: 3,033 posts
Armorama: 2,953 posts
Posted: Sunday, May 17, 2009 - 10:31 AM UTC
Quoted Text
This is awesome stuff i only wish that Taesung from Alpine would have come up with this .
I can understand Taesung's reluctance to do figures like these. Whilst ideal for those with armoured vehicles who wish to go one step further and add figures, there are an awful lot of straight figure painters who just do that, figures only and never venture into AFV's. He has to cater for as big a market as possible.
He recently passed a comment about how he was advised a certain figure set was required and would do really well. According to him it's turned out to be one of his poorest sellers and understandably now goes with his own gut feeling and judgement based on previous releases sales figures.
Back to this set, if the actual plastic on the sprue turns out as good as these images then this set will be a firm favourite for many. I know I'll get some sets in the future.
If you want tank riders and wish to go to the better detail of resin(although that gap is getting narrower with Dragons latest sets) then have a look at the Russian figure producer Tank, they do a few tank riders.
http://tank-model.ru/catalogT2.htm
Alan
exer
Dublin, Ireland
Joined: November 27, 2004
KitMaker: 6,048 posts
Armorama: 4,619 posts
Joined: November 27, 2004
KitMaker: 6,048 posts
Armorama: 4,619 posts
Posted: Sunday, May 17, 2009 - 10:32 AM UTC
Quoted Text
This is awesome stuff i only wish that Taesung from Alpine would have come up with this .
Why? I know Taesung does great work but here you have a set in plastic for a fraction of what 4 figures from Alpine would cost.
bizzychicken
Wales, United Kingdom
Joined: September 06, 2008
KitMaker: 967 posts
Armorama: 842 posts
Joined: September 06, 2008
KitMaker: 967 posts
Armorama: 842 posts
Posted: Sunday, May 17, 2009 - 11:00 AM UTC
Dragons latest Gen 1 figures are nearly if not as good as the Gen 2 Ive got the German Officers at Kursk 1943(6456) and IMHO give alot of Resin Figures a run for they're money! If this set is as good then they will be a top seller. With the two different sets of uniforms, they will be able to be modified to go with just about any Pz IV Ausf. Looking forward to seeing the plastic in the Flesh or should i say the flesh in the plastic. Bet there will be plenty of Gen 2 weapons and equipment. Good news, nice one Dragon. How about some summer ones to go with my Kursk officers?
alanmac
United Kingdom
Joined: February 25, 2007
KitMaker: 3,033 posts
Armorama: 2,953 posts
Joined: February 25, 2007
KitMaker: 3,033 posts
Armorama: 2,953 posts
Posted: Sunday, May 17, 2009 - 11:57 AM UTC
Quoted Text
How about some summer ones to go with my Kursk officers?
You could possibly use this set although I'd check on the uniform accuracy. Not sure when they started to issue gaiters and short boots rather than the "jackboot". They are not current issue but I've seen them come up for sale from time to time. Got my set on ebay a while back.
Reckon you'll need to consider a few Hornet heads though.
Alan
jimbrae
Provincia de Lugo, Spain / Espaņa
Joined: April 23, 2003
KitMaker: 12,927 posts
Armorama: 9,486 posts
Joined: April 23, 2003
KitMaker: 12,927 posts
Armorama: 9,486 posts
Posted: Sunday, May 17, 2009 - 11:28 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Not sure when they started to issue gaiters and short boots rather than the "jackboot".
From '43 onwards. It would make them more accurate for Late-War figures though. Too many manufacturers tend to overlook this change...
AlxUSMC
Armed Forces Europe, United States
Joined: December 04, 2008
KitMaker: 216 posts
Armorama: 132 posts
Joined: December 04, 2008
KitMaker: 216 posts
Armorama: 132 posts
Posted: Monday, May 18, 2009 - 03:40 AM UTC
thanks good to know!!
bizzychicken
Wales, United Kingdom
Joined: September 06, 2008
KitMaker: 967 posts
Armorama: 842 posts
Joined: September 06, 2008
KitMaker: 967 posts
Armorama: 842 posts
Posted: Monday, May 18, 2009 - 11:42 AM UTC
The Jack boot was still mainly used at Kursk, The gater and short boots were sometimes nicknamed the "Retreating Boots" on the Eastern front. They only walked West in them
Tarok
Victoria, Australia
Joined: July 28, 2004
KitMaker: 10,889 posts
Armorama: 3,245 posts
Joined: July 28, 2004
KitMaker: 10,889 posts
Armorama: 3,245 posts
Posted: Thursday, May 21, 2009 - 11:58 AM UTC
Quoted Text
You could possibly use this set although I'd check on the uniform accuracy. Not sure when they started to issue gaiters and short boots rather than the "jackboot".
I can't really make out the figure details from the box-art, but I suspect these lads are better suited to '44 than '43. It looks like they may be wearing the later field tunics - but I can't be 100% certain.
Regarding the lace-up ankle boots, they were actually issued as early as '37/'38, but seem to have been issued in greater volumes from about '41/'42. The gaiters, or canvas anklets, were issued in '41. That said, most reference material seems to indicate that it could take about 2 years before troops received supplies from initial and official issue dates.
Of course many veteran troops, officers and the WSS in particular, preferred the older style gear, and pictures taken in '44/'45 often show them wearing early war gear.
HTH
Rudi