Is there a reason for almost every British tank having a "C" name ?
Challenger, Chieftain, Cromwell, Churchill, Centurion....etc
Maybe it's just random, I don't know,
Hosted by Darren Baker
Tanks Names
Nito74
Lisboa, Portugal
Joined: March 04, 2008
KitMaker: 5,386 posts
Armorama: 4,727 posts
Joined: March 04, 2008
KitMaker: 5,386 posts
Armorama: 4,727 posts
Posted: Friday, May 15, 2009 - 03:30 PM UTC
Posted: Friday, May 15, 2009 - 07:27 PM UTC
It's a relic of the days when tanks were divided into Infantry (slow, heavily armoured, reasonably well-armed) and Cruiser (fast, lightly armoured, not so well-armed). The Infantry tanks had random names but the Cruisers quickly ended up with C names. The more useful tanks towards the end of the war were developed from the Cruiser line - Cromwell, Comet, Centurion - so the habit appears to have stuck. The Churchill was an Infantry tank but the reason for that particular name is fairly obvious ...
blaster76
Texas, United States
Joined: September 15, 2002
KitMaker: 8,985 posts
Armorama: 3,034 posts
Joined: September 15, 2002
KitMaker: 8,985 posts
Armorama: 3,034 posts
Posted: Saturday, May 16, 2009 - 08:04 AM UTC
I think I kind of like the fact that all American tanks are named after Generals...Sherman, Sheridan, Stuart, Patton, Pershing, Abrams
Genetk44
Quebec, Canada
Joined: March 17, 2006
KitMaker: 85 posts
Armorama: 73 posts
Joined: March 17, 2006
KitMaker: 85 posts
Armorama: 73 posts
Posted: Saturday, May 16, 2009 - 08:17 AM UTC
Steve...I'm sure you're aware that the nameing of American tanks after American Generals was started by...the Brits
squeeky1968
England - East Anglia, United Kingdom
Joined: June 06, 2006
KitMaker: 315 posts
Armorama: 232 posts
Joined: June 06, 2006
KitMaker: 315 posts
Armorama: 232 posts
Posted: Sunday, May 17, 2009 - 07:29 AM UTC
Remember reading about somewhere.it nearly caused an international incident when the British called one of their new lend/lease tanks...... Lee !!!! (A SOUTHERN Civil War General )
blaster76
Texas, United States
Joined: September 15, 2002
KitMaker: 8,985 posts
Armorama: 3,034 posts
Joined: September 15, 2002
KitMaker: 8,985 posts
Armorama: 3,034 posts
Posted: Sunday, May 17, 2009 - 12:28 PM UTC
I know the m-3 light tank was called both the Honey and the Stuart. Did the Brits name thins one after JEB stuart (Reb cavalry General) or did we fall into the pattern? Thge other version of the Lee was the Grant, same question
SSGToms
Connecticut, United States
Joined: April 02, 2005
KitMaker: 3,608 posts
Armorama: 3,092 posts
Joined: April 02, 2005
KitMaker: 3,608 posts
Armorama: 3,092 posts
Posted: Sunday, May 17, 2009 - 06:47 PM UTC
Yes, the British named the M3 Light the Stuart, after CSA General JEB Stuart.
Then they named the M3 Medium the Lee, after CSA General Robert E. Lee.
Of course, this was only 75 years after England backed the South in the American Civil War! Apparently the Brits were okay with that!
Then they named the next two Grant and Sherman, to even it out. Obviously someone figured out that naming all of the free tanks sent by Washington (not Richmond) after Confederate Generals might be a diplomatic blunder.
Tank type names were never used in any official US Government nomenclature or documentation during WWII. They were a British moniker, but all troops picked up the names since they were easier and more specific than the dozens of completely different items that might have the same US standardization number ( M3 light tank, M3 medium tank, M3 grease gun, etc...).
Then they named the M3 Medium the Lee, after CSA General Robert E. Lee.
Of course, this was only 75 years after England backed the South in the American Civil War! Apparently the Brits were okay with that!
Then they named the next two Grant and Sherman, to even it out. Obviously someone figured out that naming all of the free tanks sent by Washington (not Richmond) after Confederate Generals might be a diplomatic blunder.
Tank type names were never used in any official US Government nomenclature or documentation during WWII. They were a British moniker, but all troops picked up the names since they were easier and more specific than the dozens of completely different items that might have the same US standardization number ( M3 light tank, M3 medium tank, M3 grease gun, etc...).
SSGToms
Connecticut, United States
Joined: April 02, 2005
KitMaker: 3,608 posts
Armorama: 3,092 posts
Joined: April 02, 2005
KitMaker: 3,608 posts
Armorama: 3,092 posts
Posted: Sunday, May 17, 2009 - 06:52 PM UTC
Oh, and the Brits called the M3 Light Tank a "Honey" of a tank because it was fast and reliable, two traits that somewhat eluded British tanks of the time.
GeraldOwens
Florida, United States
Joined: March 30, 2006
KitMaker: 3,736 posts
Armorama: 3,697 posts
Joined: March 30, 2006
KitMaker: 3,736 posts
Armorama: 3,697 posts
Posted: Sunday, May 17, 2009 - 11:36 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Oh, and the Brits called the M3 Light Tank a "Honey" of a tank because it was fast and reliable, two traits that somewhat eluded British tanks of the time.
Some British authors have suggested the name was accidentally coined by US training personnel who showed the British forces in North Africa how to operate the M3, since calling a responsive vehicle "a honey" was more characteristic of US slang than British at the time. Of course, it's impossible to be certain at this late date.
Nito74
Lisboa, Portugal
Joined: March 04, 2008
KitMaker: 5,386 posts
Armorama: 4,727 posts
Joined: March 04, 2008
KitMaker: 5,386 posts
Armorama: 4,727 posts
Posted: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 - 04:03 PM UTC
Thanks for the help and also for a little history lesson