Andrzej Snigorski reviews Dragon Models 1/35 figure kit showing German and Italian soldiers fighting Yugoslavian Partisans in 1943.
Link to Item
If you have comments or questions please post them here.
Thanks!
Figures
Military figures of all shapes and sizes.
Military figures of all shapes and sizes.
Hosted by Darren Baker, Mario Matijasic
REVIEW
DML Hunting the Partisans 1943c5flies
California, United States
Joined: October 21, 2007
KitMaker: 3,684 posts
Armorama: 2,938 posts
Joined: October 21, 2007
KitMaker: 3,684 posts
Armorama: 2,938 posts
Posted: Thursday, May 21, 2009 - 04:02 PM UTC
Tarok
Victoria, Australia
Joined: July 28, 2004
KitMaker: 10,889 posts
Armorama: 3,245 posts
Joined: July 28, 2004
KitMaker: 10,889 posts
Armorama: 3,245 posts
Posted: Sunday, May 24, 2009 - 03:25 PM UTC
Thanks for your review. I would have liked to have seen at least one figure assembled and a few comments on assemble and quality of fit included though.
c5flies
California, United States
Joined: October 21, 2007
KitMaker: 3,684 posts
Armorama: 2,938 posts
Joined: October 21, 2007
KitMaker: 3,684 posts
Armorama: 2,938 posts
Posted: Sunday, May 24, 2009 - 03:59 PM UTC
Andrzej may do a build of these figures at some time, which would then be linked from the review. Don't get me wrong...it would be nice to see these built to check the assembly and fit, the same as it would be beneficial to see the AFV kits reviewed as build logs.....but as an In-Box I have enough info to go off of between the text and photos.
Tarok
Victoria, Australia
Joined: July 28, 2004
KitMaker: 10,889 posts
Armorama: 3,245 posts
Joined: July 28, 2004
KitMaker: 10,889 posts
Armorama: 3,245 posts
Posted: Sunday, May 24, 2009 - 04:08 PM UTC
Hi James,
Agreed - sorry, had to hit submit before I could add the fluffy bits
For an In-box review it's fine (I didn't say the review was not useful), but personally I'd like to know more about the fit of the figures, as I like the poses, particularly that of the gun crew.
As I said before, thanks for the review Andrzej.
RR
Agreed - sorry, had to hit submit before I could add the fluffy bits
For an In-box review it's fine (I didn't say the review was not useful), but personally I'd like to know more about the fit of the figures, as I like the poses, particularly that of the gun crew.
As I said before, thanks for the review Andrzej.
RR
endrju007
Wojewodztwo Podkarpackie, Poland
Joined: December 05, 2007
KitMaker: 2,435 posts
Armorama: 1,256 posts
Joined: December 05, 2007
KitMaker: 2,435 posts
Armorama: 1,256 posts
Posted: Sunday, May 24, 2009 - 08:47 PM UTC
Thanks for comment Rudi,
I'll remember to check at least one figure for fit/function characteristics in future reviews.
Usualy I don't glue whole figure before painting (it depends on figure but i.e. I like to paint head separately if possible) but it's not necessary to check if parts have good dry fit.
Thanks for a hint!
Andrzej
I'll remember to check at least one figure for fit/function characteristics in future reviews.
Usualy I don't glue whole figure before painting (it depends on figure but i.e. I like to paint head separately if possible) but it's not necessary to check if parts have good dry fit.
Thanks for a hint!
Andrzej
Tarok
Victoria, Australia
Joined: July 28, 2004
KitMaker: 10,889 posts
Armorama: 3,245 posts
Joined: July 28, 2004
KitMaker: 10,889 posts
Armorama: 3,245 posts
Posted: Sunday, May 24, 2009 - 09:10 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Usualy I don't glue whole figure before painting (it depends on figure but i.e. I like to paint head separately if possible) but it's not necessary to check if parts have good dry fit.
Thanks for a hint!
You're welcome, Andrzej. You don't need to glue the figure together though, even putting it together with poster tack/putty (like BlueTac) will give you and the reader a good idea of fit.
Rudi
lespauljames
England - South West, United Kingdom
Joined: January 06, 2007
KitMaker: 3,661 posts
Armorama: 2,764 posts
Joined: January 06, 2007
KitMaker: 3,661 posts
Armorama: 2,764 posts
Posted: Monday, May 25, 2009 - 01:01 AM UTC
great review Mate!
good detail, and good depth, Thanks
good detail, and good depth, Thanks
jimbrae
Provincia de Lugo, Spain / Espaņa
Joined: April 23, 2003
KitMaker: 12,927 posts
Armorama: 9,486 posts
Joined: April 23, 2003
KitMaker: 12,927 posts
Armorama: 9,486 posts
Posted: Monday, May 25, 2009 - 01:04 AM UTC
Just a minor point - there is no such range as 'Gen 1' all of THESE figure releases are DML's 39-45 series.
Uruk-Hai
Stockholm, Sweden
Joined: January 31, 2003
KitMaker: 795 posts
Armorama: 472 posts
Joined: January 31, 2003
KitMaker: 795 posts
Armorama: 472 posts
Posted: Monday, May 25, 2009 - 02:12 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Hi James,
Agreed - sorry, had to hit submit before I could add the fluffy bits
For an In-box review it's fine (I didn't say the review was not useful), but personally I'd like to know more about the fit of the figures, as I like the poses, particularly that of the gun crew.
As I said before, thanks for the review Andrzej.
RR
Im with you here, Rudi! I think that putting them together would make a real difference. Perhaps also identifying the timeline the figures are suitable for would be of use as well?
Cheers
c5flies
California, United States
Joined: October 21, 2007
KitMaker: 3,684 posts
Armorama: 2,938 posts
Joined: October 21, 2007
KitMaker: 3,684 posts
Armorama: 2,938 posts
Posted: Monday, May 25, 2009 - 09:48 AM UTC
Gen1? My mistake...I know absolutely nothing about figures.....corrected.
As far as the timeline....the kit is geared towards 1943, and the historical background should give a bit more info on when these can be used.
As far as the timeline....the kit is geared towards 1943, and the historical background should give a bit more info on when these can be used.
endrju007
Wojewodztwo Podkarpackie, Poland
Joined: December 05, 2007
KitMaker: 2,435 posts
Armorama: 1,256 posts
Joined: December 05, 2007
KitMaker: 2,435 posts
Armorama: 1,256 posts
Posted: Monday, May 25, 2009 - 10:14 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Gen1? My mistake...I know absolutely nothing about figures.....corrected.
As far as the timeline....the kit is geared towards 1943, and the historical background should give a bit more info on when these can be used.
My mistake as well... but if you say one 2 you should say 1 as well (or something like that) .
The title suggests '43 so you can safely use this one for depicting '43-45 (at least for Germans).
@ James, did you really read my Historical Background part? I thought noone will and I was writing it just to kill time at work... Just kiddin'
Thank you for comments guys!
A
martyncrowther
England - West Midlands, United Kingdom
Joined: September 12, 2007
KitMaker: 1,548 posts
Armorama: 1,407 posts
Joined: September 12, 2007
KitMaker: 1,548 posts
Armorama: 1,407 posts
Posted: Thursday, May 28, 2009 - 11:01 AM UTC
Nice review mate. I will be geting this set now.
Finch
New York, United States
Joined: August 03, 2005
KitMaker: 411 posts
Armorama: 273 posts
Joined: August 03, 2005
KitMaker: 411 posts
Armorama: 273 posts
Posted: Thursday, May 28, 2009 - 03:37 PM UTC
The Bersaglieri Regiment was an elite Italian infantry regiment; "marksman" is not really a good english translation of the term. They were theoretically intended to be the top infantry regiment in the Italian Army, something akin to the Ranger regiment in the US Army, but the concept became very politicized as with the rest of the Italian Royal Army (Regio Escercito).
The feathers and red flashes on the jacket lapels are insignia worn by Bersaglieri troopers.
The feathers and red flashes on the jacket lapels are insignia worn by Bersaglieri troopers.