Hello everyone,
I have a question (I know, hard to believe ), attached is a picture of 3 M2A2's, an M1A1 and a M113 taken on a bridge near (or in) Baghdad. My question is what is the M113 used for, is it a standard APC, ambulance, or some sort of Command and Control varient. Having the 50cal on it kind of leads me away from the ambulance idea, but I am still not sure. Also, if it is anything other than the normal APC, does anyone have any pictures of the interior?
Thanks so much for your time,
Chris
http://groups.msn.com/armorama/chrisalbumofun.msnw?action=ShowPhoto&PhotoID=10107
Hosted by Darren Baker
OIF M113 Question...
ctmi911
Michigan, United States
Joined: May 08, 2003
KitMaker: 151 posts
Armorama: 113 posts
Joined: May 08, 2003
KitMaker: 151 posts
Armorama: 113 posts
Posted: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 - 03:38 PM UTC
Jacques
Minnesota, United States
Joined: March 04, 2003
KitMaker: 4,630 posts
Armorama: 4,498 posts
Joined: March 04, 2003
KitMaker: 4,630 posts
Armorama: 4,498 posts
Posted: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 - 04:22 PM UTC
Well, seems suspicious, but it looks like a standard M113 to me...not a M577, not a M1064 Mortar Maggot Mover, not a Medical vehicle (no red crosses at least not seen under all the stowage), not a Smoke generator...maybe a engineer's vehicle?
Looks weird to see a plain vanilla M113 with the varsity crowd, so to speak. Maybe a repatriated Iraqi M113? #:-)
Looks weird to see a plain vanilla M113 with the varsity crowd, so to speak. Maybe a repatriated Iraqi M113? #:-)
ctmi911
Michigan, United States
Joined: May 08, 2003
KitMaker: 151 posts
Armorama: 113 posts
Joined: May 08, 2003
KitMaker: 151 posts
Armorama: 113 posts
Posted: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 - 04:31 PM UTC
Jacques,
Hey, I hadn't thought of that one! An engineer's vehicle. It would make sense having it there, with the damaged bridge and all. But it doesn't seem to have much in the way of engineer type stowage. Actually it kind of looks like an Israeli M113, were they there and nobody ever said anything?!?! :-)
Thanks for the ideas,
-Chris
Hey, I hadn't thought of that one! An engineer's vehicle. It would make sense having it there, with the damaged bridge and all. But it doesn't seem to have much in the way of engineer type stowage. Actually it kind of looks like an Israeli M113, were they there and nobody ever said anything?!?! :-)
Thanks for the ideas,
-Chris
cfbush2000
North Dakota, United States
Joined: December 01, 2001
KitMaker: 1,796 posts
Armorama: 1,207 posts
Joined: December 01, 2001
KitMaker: 1,796 posts
Armorama: 1,207 posts
Posted: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 - 05:17 PM UTC
Chris,
Thanks for posting the picture. It is a keeper.
As for the M113. Could it just be part of an activated reserve unit? I know some of our North Dakota folks took M113's with them.
Thanks for posting the picture. It is a keeper.
As for the M113. Could it just be part of an activated reserve unit? I know some of our North Dakota folks took M113's with them.
HeavyArty
Florida, United States
Joined: May 16, 2002
KitMaker: 17,694 posts
Armorama: 13,742 posts
Joined: May 16, 2002
KitMaker: 17,694 posts
Armorama: 13,742 posts
Posted: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 - 12:10 AM UTC
From the ID numbers on the Bradleys, thtose are vehicles out of 3-7 CAV, 3ID. It may be hard to believe but M-113's are still all over the active force. They are stil used as maintenance and engineer vehicles as well as ambulances and mortar carriers and command vehicles. Just got back from Iraq myself a couple of weeks ago, 1-39 FA (MLRS), 3ID. The storage racks that make it look like an Isreali AFV were common over there. Due to the amountof junk we carry with us, all sorts of vehicles sprouted racks. Abrams, Bradleys, even HMMWVs had racks added to the top or sides. We should have learned this from our Isreali brothers long ago.
ctmi911
Michigan, United States
Joined: May 08, 2003
KitMaker: 151 posts
Armorama: 113 posts
Joined: May 08, 2003
KitMaker: 151 posts
Armorama: 113 posts
Posted: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 - 08:43 AM UTC
Thanks everyone for your responses.
I am thinking of turning my small M2A2/Hmmwv into something similar to this scene. I will most likely make the M113 into an engineer vehicle. One more funny thing (to me anyway, am only now getting up to date on modern American armor), is that the M113 does not have the rear external fuel tanks. I thought that this was an upgrade to the A2 or A3 version, or did the military find out that the external tanks were a bad idea?
Thanks again,
Chris
And Gino, welcome home!
I am thinking of turning my small M2A2/Hmmwv into something similar to this scene. I will most likely make the M113 into an engineer vehicle. One more funny thing (to me anyway, am only now getting up to date on modern American armor), is that the M113 does not have the rear external fuel tanks. I thought that this was an upgrade to the A2 or A3 version, or did the military find out that the external tanks were a bad idea?
Thanks again,
Chris
And Gino, welcome home!
Jacques
Minnesota, United States
Joined: March 04, 2003
KitMaker: 4,630 posts
Armorama: 4,498 posts
Joined: March 04, 2003
KitMaker: 4,630 posts
Armorama: 4,498 posts
Posted: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 - 08:47 AM UTC
I am not sure about the A3...Sabot? but the onlyh A2's I know of with the Rear fuel tanks were the M981 FistV and the M901 ITOW.
cfbush2000
North Dakota, United States
Joined: December 01, 2001
KitMaker: 1,796 posts
Armorama: 1,207 posts
Joined: December 01, 2001
KitMaker: 1,796 posts
Armorama: 1,207 posts
Posted: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 - 08:51 AM UTC
I was talking to a friend today about this picture and he mentioned that the M113 may have been an AF FAC vehicle. I hadn't thought about it, but it makes sense,
ctmi911
Michigan, United States
Joined: May 08, 2003
KitMaker: 151 posts
Armorama: 113 posts
Joined: May 08, 2003
KitMaker: 151 posts
Armorama: 113 posts
Posted: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 - 10:38 AM UTC
Hey now that is cool, never thought about a FAC vehicle!
Anyone know if they are normal M113's with extra radios and map tables? Gonna have to scour the internet for this one.
Pondering this one...
Chris
Anyone know if they are normal M113's with extra radios and map tables? Gonna have to scour the internet for this one.
Pondering this one...
Chris
steve203
North Carolina, United States
Joined: May 25, 2003
KitMaker: 579 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: May 25, 2003
KitMaker: 579 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 - 12:49 PM UTC
The FIST-V is used for artillery direction. I don't think they have a seperate one for FAC. The FIST-V's have a turret on top that is designed to look like a TOW missle launcher. It really houses optics and a laser designator. The quickest way to tell them apart from an actual TOW carrier is that they usually have a ton of antennas on them. They may not even use them anymore. I have been out of the service for awhile. I'm sure most everyone here knew this already. I am bored and just feel like writing while the glue is drying.
keenan
Indiana, United States
Joined: October 16, 2002
KitMaker: 5,272 posts
Armorama: 2,844 posts
Joined: October 16, 2002
KitMaker: 5,272 posts
Armorama: 2,844 posts
Posted: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 - 12:58 PM UTC
Man Steve, I am jealous. My modeling bench is in the basement, too damp for the computers. (Yes, we have 2 and there are only three of us in the house.) I wish I could post here while the glue was drying. And, no I did not know that. Thanks for the info.
Shaun
Shaun
Sabot
Joined: December 18, 2001
KitMaker: 12,596 posts
Armorama: 9,071 posts
KitMaker: 12,596 posts
Armorama: 9,071 posts
Posted: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 - 01:35 PM UTC
Quoted Text
FIST-V is being replaced by the BFIST, which is a Bradley with the artillery laser designator inside. Our battalion in Germany had a separate M113A3 for the ALO or Air Liason Officer. It had extra radios that were different from our normal SINCGARS radios and more antennas. I recall one looking more like a small stove pipe than an antenna. When I was the HHC XO, we had to maintain the vehicle and the blue suiters just showed up for major exercises. Normal complement was one Air Force captain and a pair of NCOs. We provided the driver. Never interacted with those guys then.The FIST-V is used for artillery direction. I don't think they have a seperate one for FAC.
In 1st Cav, our ALO used a regular M998 4 door HMMWV with the "station wagon" canvas cover. The entire rear area had a radio configuration that I was unfamiliar with. When I was the BMO (Battalion Maintenance Officer) the Air Force enlistedmen took the HMMWV out for a joyride and rolled it. I remember having to do a 15-6 investigation on the accident and cost of repairs. We had to strip out all the radios and mount them into another M998 until that truck was repaired (took months).
When we deployed, I shared a hootch(sp?) with the ALO and his two airmen. He was a Phantom pilot by trade. The airmen weren't the same guys who had rolled the M998. He probably would have preferred an M113A3.
ctmi911
Michigan, United States
Joined: May 08, 2003
KitMaker: 151 posts
Armorama: 113 posts
Joined: May 08, 2003
KitMaker: 151 posts
Armorama: 113 posts
Posted: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 - 02:46 PM UTC
Cool tidbits everyone, that's one of the things that is so great about this site. Such a wide range of people here that have a wealth of knowledge and are will to share it with us! Sorry I only really know about Public Safety related matters, so if anyone has any Police, Fire, EMS or Emergency Management questions, I'm your guy! (++)
But I digress. I don't see that many antennas (except for the really long one with the small flag on it, wonder what it says?). I tried blowing it up, but even after cleaning it up, it was still too blurry to see much more detail.
Thanks again everyone for your time and knowledge,
Chris
But I digress. I don't see that many antennas (except for the really long one with the small flag on it, wonder what it says?). I tried blowing it up, but even after cleaning it up, it was still too blurry to see much more detail.
Thanks again everyone for your time and knowledge,
Chris
Jacques
Minnesota, United States
Joined: March 04, 2003
KitMaker: 4,630 posts
Armorama: 4,498 posts
Joined: March 04, 2003
KitMaker: 4,630 posts
Armorama: 4,498 posts
Posted: Thursday, June 26, 2003 - 12:58 AM UTC
Honest guess on it is a engineer vehicle.
As for the FISTV - BFIST it is four antenna's...one for the Company, one for Divarty, one for Battalion, and one for Brigade. Fun fun fun. I always wondered why we were listed as the #1 target on the battlefield.
As for the FISTV - BFIST it is four antenna's...one for the Company, one for Divarty, one for Battalion, and one for Brigade. Fun fun fun. I always wondered why we were listed as the #1 target on the battlefield.
ctmi911
Michigan, United States
Joined: May 08, 2003
KitMaker: 151 posts
Armorama: 113 posts
Joined: May 08, 2003
KitMaker: 151 posts
Armorama: 113 posts
Posted: Thursday, June 26, 2003 - 06:50 AM UTC
Yeah, I think that I am going to make it into the engineer vehicle.
What type of stuff would they carry, I figure it would be their smaller, lighter items. I have the tow-bar from the Legends M1 kit, would that be something that they would have stowed? Or maybe tied to the roof or something?
Thanks,
Chris
What type of stuff would they carry, I figure it would be their smaller, lighter items. I have the tow-bar from the Legends M1 kit, would that be something that they would have stowed? Or maybe tied to the roof or something?
Thanks,
Chris
keenan
Indiana, United States
Joined: October 16, 2002
KitMaker: 5,272 posts
Armorama: 2,844 posts
Joined: October 16, 2002
KitMaker: 5,272 posts
Armorama: 2,844 posts
Posted: Thursday, June 26, 2003 - 06:55 AM UTC
Here is another picture of the same scene taken a little earlier or later, not sure which.
Shaun
P.S. I think it is later because the white vehicle that can be seen in the first picture got whaled on and is burning in the second...
Shaun
P.S. I think it is later because the white vehicle that can be seen in the first picture got whaled on and is burning in the second...
ctmi911
Michigan, United States
Joined: May 08, 2003
KitMaker: 151 posts
Armorama: 113 posts
Joined: May 08, 2003
KitMaker: 151 posts
Armorama: 113 posts
Posted: Thursday, June 26, 2003 - 07:31 AM UTC
Shawn,
Cool thanks!
I think that you are right about the time frame, the white car is burning really good in your picture. Wonder what happened to all the smoke from the explosion in the right-side background in mine, doesn't seem like it will all go away that fast.
Anyway, definitely have to add this one to my collection.
-Chris
Cool thanks!
I think that you are right about the time frame, the white car is burning really good in your picture. Wonder what happened to all the smoke from the explosion in the right-side background in mine, doesn't seem like it will all go away that fast.
Anyway, definitely have to add this one to my collection.
-Chris
salt6
Oklahoma, United States
Joined: February 17, 2002
KitMaker: 796 posts
Armorama: 574 posts
Joined: February 17, 2002
KitMaker: 796 posts
Armorama: 574 posts
Posted: Saturday, June 28, 2003 - 09:17 AM UTC
Check the flag out on the antenna. It's an engineer vehicle.
ARENGCA
Arizona, United States
Joined: February 13, 2002
KitMaker: 382 posts
Armorama: 267 posts
Joined: February 13, 2002
KitMaker: 382 posts
Armorama: 267 posts
Posted: Saturday, June 28, 2003 - 10:31 AM UTC
You will have to tell me what the flag is, because I can't tell at all. You may be right about it being an engineer track.
I am not so sure, because there is a lot of stuff that should be on it that isn't, if they are engineers. Engineers are terrific pack rats, and have several large boxes of gear they have to carry with them. Looking back at pics of ODS, IFOR, and KFOR engineers you can see this. I would expect at least one footlocker sized box, and several rolls of concertina. I was under the impression that most Active enginner units were completly converted to A3s, too.
I was leaning toward a maintenance vehicle, or a vehicle from a FSB or something similar. Equipment modernization tends to come quite late to the odds and ends in units otherwise equipped with other stuff. The handfull of maintenance M113s in the different echelons supporting a heavy division don't get a lot of emphasis at budget time, and even less so in prepo equipment sites. They tend to range pretty far forward in action, so the location is not very surprising.
Just my own take. I may be wrong!
I am not so sure, because there is a lot of stuff that should be on it that isn't, if they are engineers. Engineers are terrific pack rats, and have several large boxes of gear they have to carry with them. Looking back at pics of ODS, IFOR, and KFOR engineers you can see this. I would expect at least one footlocker sized box, and several rolls of concertina. I was under the impression that most Active enginner units were completly converted to A3s, too.
I was leaning toward a maintenance vehicle, or a vehicle from a FSB or something similar. Equipment modernization tends to come quite late to the odds and ends in units otherwise equipped with other stuff. The handfull of maintenance M113s in the different echelons supporting a heavy division don't get a lot of emphasis at budget time, and even less so in prepo equipment sites. They tend to range pretty far forward in action, so the location is not very surprising.
Just my own take. I may be wrong!
salt6
Oklahoma, United States
Joined: February 17, 2002
KitMaker: 796 posts
Armorama: 574 posts
Joined: February 17, 2002
KitMaker: 796 posts
Armorama: 574 posts
Posted: Sunday, June 29, 2003 - 01:45 AM UTC
The flag is is red, obviously, with the engineer castle,white, in the middle of the field. I saw allot of these the last two weeks while I was in the field. BTW I've also seen subdued ones, tan flag with a black castle.
You would also expect to seen a trailer being pulled by the 113 but you got to remember this was probably a deliberate attack to capture this bridge. So I would expect to see an engineer asset with the infantry to deal with any possible demo charges.
It'd look something like this without the numbers and letters for the unit ID,
If this 113 came out of preposition stocks, there's no telling what you might get.
You would also expect to seen a trailer being pulled by the 113 but you got to remember this was probably a deliberate attack to capture this bridge. So I would expect to see an engineer asset with the infantry to deal with any possible demo charges.
It'd look something like this without the numbers and letters for the unit ID,
If this 113 came out of preposition stocks, there's no telling what you might get.
ctmi911
Michigan, United States
Joined: May 08, 2003
KitMaker: 151 posts
Armorama: 113 posts
Joined: May 08, 2003
KitMaker: 151 posts
Armorama: 113 posts
Posted: Sunday, June 29, 2003 - 08:26 AM UTC
Yes, it looks like we have our answer. Pretty cool looking flag too! Thanks again for all of your responses, has helped me out a ton.
Now another add-on question...does anyone know if the Academy M113 kits have an possible (open or closed) rear ramp door? I would like to show some of the interior, but not too much
Thanks again for the help gang,
Chris
Now another add-on question...does anyone know if the Academy M113 kits have an possible (open or closed) rear ramp door? I would like to show some of the interior, but not too much
Thanks again for the help gang,
Chris
ARENGCA
Arizona, United States
Joined: February 13, 2002
KitMaker: 382 posts
Armorama: 267 posts
Joined: February 13, 2002
KitMaker: 382 posts
Armorama: 267 posts
Posted: Sunday, June 29, 2003 - 09:15 AM UTC
I seem to remember that the Academy M113A2 has a seperate crew door in the ramp, but I would have to go dig to be sure. If I can get to it, I will.
Steve, I bow to your judgement. Your point about prepo equipment is true...you never know what you will get, regardless of what you are usually assigned at home!
Steve, I bow to your judgement. Your point about prepo equipment is true...you never know what you will get, regardless of what you are usually assigned at home!
ctmi911
Michigan, United States
Joined: May 08, 2003
KitMaker: 151 posts
Armorama: 113 posts
Joined: May 08, 2003
KitMaker: 151 posts
Armorama: 113 posts
Posted: Sunday, June 29, 2003 - 10:10 PM UTC
Arengca,
If you get a chance to take a look at the Academy M113 kit that would be great!
Thanks again,
Chris
If you get a chance to take a look at the Academy M113 kit that would be great!
Thanks again,
Chris
Sabot
Joined: December 18, 2001
KitMaker: 12,596 posts
Armorama: 9,071 posts
KitMaker: 12,596 posts
Armorama: 9,071 posts
Posted: Sunday, June 29, 2003 - 11:42 PM UTC
Yes, the Academy M113A2 has a separate crew access door in the ramp.