The last two vignettes are at the opposite ends of the scale in many ways.The crashed airplane is very somber in mood while the "Buds" piece is happy .One a very dark theme and the other light.
The airplane picture gives the eye very little visual information and looks the most real, while the opposite is true of the figures.Both tell stories but on completely different levels.Proving that in art sometimes less is more!

this prooves you have alot of time on your hand... Gee

I like the light-contrast on some pictures. Also some of them looks like a real photo!
Good work!

greetings...
Soeren

Thank you to the Aerodrome.com
for including my stuff in their Art Gallery.Until now only 2D paintings or drawings have been accepted.Not only have they recognized my dioramas as Art but also my digital picture compositions in 2D as well.
This is wonderful news not only for me but for all dioramists and photographers out there.
Sure it is not the American or Canadian Aviation Artists associations that we are talking about here but it is a crack in the door of what is considered Aviation Art.

Somebody asked me what do you call what you do? you know I had a tough time putting a handle on it myself.When you take a picture of a painting they call it a print.When you take multiple pics in a row they call it a movie.But when you take a 2D pic of a composition that you have created in 3D,what then would you call it.If your composition is totally scratch built and then you take a pic and then put it in a digital frame what would you call it ?A digital print? Interesting..........