Hi Jim
Could you please advise me as to the legality (or otherwise) of scanning and posting historical photos from books. The circumstances I can imagine would be to answer another modeller's questions , or so folks can comment on a photo.
Either way it's "not for profit", but I presume it's a breach of copyright, so I thought I'd check before going ahead and causing problems. What's Armorama's position?
All the best
Rowan
Site Talk
Site announcements, comments, or feedback about the site.
Site announcements, comments, or feedback about the site.
Hosted by Darren Baker, Jim Starkweather
Posting reference photos?
Posted: Friday, June 27, 2003 - 06:47 PM UTC
Posted: Saturday, June 28, 2003 - 06:56 AM UTC
Rowan,
Generally we would prefer that only images that you have photographed yourself are used as reference. This is for two reasons really. First so that there are no copyright issues. Second because there are literally tens of thousands of older period reference photos out there and we just don't have room to host all the images that would come flooding in.
On another note I am really foggy about "who" really owns the copyright to various period images used in most of the reference books available. For example images taken by the USCE or any images taken by US personell hired as combat photographers are property of the US government and considered public domain (by most things I have read). The same might be considered true of German propaganda photos. Of course most copyrights have expired on WWII period photos which is why we see so many "bargain books" at places like Barnes and Noble with WWII era photographs.
Something tells me that a few publishers will disagree with my opinions above. But that is why we have lawyers I guess. They always tell us they can win a case no matter which side of the argument they are on.
Cheers,
Jim
Generally we would prefer that only images that you have photographed yourself are used as reference. This is for two reasons really. First so that there are no copyright issues. Second because there are literally tens of thousands of older period reference photos out there and we just don't have room to host all the images that would come flooding in.
On another note I am really foggy about "who" really owns the copyright to various period images used in most of the reference books available. For example images taken by the USCE or any images taken by US personell hired as combat photographers are property of the US government and considered public domain (by most things I have read). The same might be considered true of German propaganda photos. Of course most copyrights have expired on WWII period photos which is why we see so many "bargain books" at places like Barnes and Noble with WWII era photographs.
Something tells me that a few publishers will disagree with my opinions above. But that is why we have lawyers I guess. They always tell us they can win a case no matter which side of the argument they are on.
Cheers,
Jim
Posted: Saturday, June 28, 2003 - 08:18 AM UTC
Hi Jim
Thanks for clarifying things. I'd never considered the public-domain aspect but, as you say, I'm sure plenty of publishers would be quick to disagree. Well, it gives the lawyers something to do, bless their cotton socks...
All the best
Rowan| |)
Thanks for clarifying things. I'd never considered the public-domain aspect but, as you say, I'm sure plenty of publishers would be quick to disagree. Well, it gives the lawyers something to do, bless their cotton socks...
All the best
Rowan| |)