My plan is to have a machine that fought in the fall of 1944 (late October) This will entail trying to sort out the differences between a late and mid production Ausf J because the kit I’ll use for the base will be the old Dragon 1/35 #6022, released in 1994. This was the original release of the Dragon Ausf J, which was for the late production variant.

There is not an over abundance of information about this kit on the internet. It has taken weeks of searching every forum I could to find what I have about it. None of the following is of my own findings, but that of fellow modelers with more resources to their disposal. I am just trying to convey the main consensus of opinion.
The findings
It is likely that the kit was based on an incorrect Museum Pz. Kpfw IV J reconstruction, which had incorrect fabrication of different features. It was unfortunate that Dragon picked this machine as the basis for their design of the kit.
The Turret

There is a multi-bolted ring, like the commander's hatch of a Jagdtiger, on the museum specimen between the commander's cupola and the turret-roof. Some where along the line this tank must have had its cupola removed and reinstalled using that bolted spacing ring. The cupola has been welded on to the spacing ring, the welds of which do not appear to match any other weld marks on the tank. Dragon followed suit with this odd set up, making the copula sit high on top of the turret in a strange looking manner. Speaking of welding seams, the kit lacks even rudimentary weld details anywhere. The kit’s cupola was molded with the vision ports closed, this is not necessarily wrong, but it is more common to see them open. The hatch is also of the late swiveling style which I’ll need to convert to the hinged type. The side doors are solid one piece non opening affairs. I am not too concerned by this, because if opened, I’d need to detail the turret interior. The kit’s overall turret base length is about right, but the angle of the side plates, with the side hatch openings, and the curved rear plate is too far forward. This throws the other angles off. It is possible that the turret shell is a bit too tall as well, and the turret kasten (storage bin) may be under scale. The last two I am not going to mess with since the turret armor will not give a clear view of the turret anyway.
The Hull
The first all-original kit from DML (6022) had problems with the hull.
The Upper Hull

The driver’s and co-driver’s hatches are too far forward on the kit part when compared with the drawings in Panzer Tracts 4-60, assuming the drawings are right.
The front armor panel was a scale 20 mm thick instead of 80 mm. The hull machine gun mount is poor but it’ll do for my needs. The driver’s vision port is closed, like the copula ports, this is not commonly seen.
The Lower Hull

There' is a scale problem with the forward superstructure deck. The access hatch plates do not look to be in scale. The hinges for the final drive access hatches look too small. On the plus side the kit does offer the choice of using handles on the final drive access plates, as seen on very late production runs, or the vent hoods that are more common. The hoods are not mentioned in the instructions but they are in the kit. The shape of the mudguards are said to be based on the incorrect museum restoration, so the shape was wrong. The fender tread plate starts too far aft.

To try and fix some of these issues, Shanghai Dragon then mated their parts with the lower hull and mudguards from the Gunze Sangyo Panzer IV, the kit then became 6080. This “new” kit’s lower hull was a little better detailed and corrected the some of the shape issues. It was a great improvement, but the upper hull parts and turret were largely unchanged.
Conclusions to Plan
There may be more but these are the most talked about issues that this kit has without going into the limitations of molding techniques of the era that it was produced.
At this point one might ask why go to all the trouble of building this kit since the arrival of the new “Smart Kit” or Tamiya’s Ausf J? The answer is simple, this is what I have and could afford at this moment in time. Trust me… I would much rather have the Smart Kit.
Pressing on with this project. I will try to make improvements in the kits appearance, not corrections to flaws. I have no drawings or books to work from so all of my references will be taken from the internet.
The front lower hull I have built up with sheet stock to give it the 80mm armor plate.


I think this looks much better.
I cut out the added plate on top of the turret.


Now the copula doesn’t look odd sitting up so high on the turret.
I have made a new top deck for the forward upper hull.

Now… Dare I go through with it? If I do the next part there will be no turning back… *GULP!*
Well that’s it for now… Let me know what you think, save for the cracks on my sanity.
Dave Shaw