Hosted by Darren Baker
M-3A4/M-4A4
phanthomred4
Texas, United States
Joined: May 28, 2009
KitMaker: 158 posts
Armorama: 90 posts
Joined: May 28, 2009
KitMaker: 158 posts
Armorama: 90 posts
Posted: Monday, March 01, 2010 - 04:49 AM UTC
Hello everyone. I need help w/ the following. I have @ present 2 Tamiya M-3/mk 1 Lees, 1Tamiya M-3 Grant I, and 1Academy M-3 Grant I. I plan on getting Academy's M-3 Lee , M-12, and M-7. As you can tell the M-3's I interested in are A57 powered. I've been grave digging the net and find it's time to get w/ the experts! Keeping this focused on (in) the N. African, ETO, PTO theaters, I would like suspension, turret, hull, Unit (US army) user's info. I run to the gamut of three types of suspensions, 5 road wheels, some turret ( elec/ hydro) power and shapes. I 've browsed the after-market for resin choices. The hull ('s) will be scratch from 40 thou sheet, the reason of course is the 20 or so inches in additional hull length (no gun over hang). The point is I have some conficting spec's like the length being 238.5 "s like a M-4A4 or 242"s. How do the M-7( not M-7B-1), and M-12 factor in. Yes, I am aware that there is an additional 6"s in between the boggie spring towers. But, again that is questioned. Any help would great. Oh, I know the tamiya kits don't stand up well to the Academy kits, but for $10.00 less, I can do w/o the damaged parts and the spare parts fodder (my pref) but why complain, I can get almost seven vehicles from four Kits, and I know about the Academy Lee suspension problem w/ older issues. , Michael.
junglejim
Alberta, Canada
Joined: February 18, 2003
KitMaker: 1,728 posts
Armorama: 1,629 posts
Joined: February 18, 2003
KitMaker: 1,728 posts
Armorama: 1,629 posts
Posted: Monday, March 01, 2010 - 05:19 AM UTC
Let me be the first to say...
What??
Ah, what's the question exactly? Lot's of stuff there...
Jim
What??
Ah, what's the question exactly? Lot's of stuff there...
Jim
TonyDz
United States
Joined: December 13, 2009
KitMaker: 420 posts
Armorama: 419 posts
Joined: December 13, 2009
KitMaker: 420 posts
Armorama: 419 posts
Posted: Monday, March 01, 2010 - 06:34 AM UTC
No kidding. Slow down and think out a question.
NormSon
North Carolina, United States
Joined: December 17, 2006
KitMaker: 181 posts
Armorama: 141 posts
Joined: December 17, 2006
KitMaker: 181 posts
Armorama: 141 posts
Posted: Monday, March 01, 2010 - 07:34 AM UTC
If the question is, did the US Army use Chrysler powered tanks, the answer is, no. The vast majority, other than a few used for stateside training, went to Lend Lease, most to UK units.
I'm not sure what the rest of this is trying to get to.
I'm not sure what the rest of this is trying to get to.
ARENGCA
Arizona, United States
Joined: February 13, 2002
KitMaker: 382 posts
Armorama: 267 posts
Joined: February 13, 2002
KitMaker: 382 posts
Armorama: 267 posts
Posted: Monday, March 01, 2010 - 07:55 AM UTC
Seems to me that anyone with all of the information you ask for could simply write a book. Why respond to it in a forum (for free!) when a book that gathered all that information into one place would actually make money?
Of course, I may just misunderstand the question. Assuming there actually is one buried in there...
Of course, I may just misunderstand the question. Assuming there actually is one buried in there...
SSGToms
Connecticut, United States
Joined: April 02, 2005
KitMaker: 3,608 posts
Armorama: 3,092 posts
Joined: April 02, 2005
KitMaker: 3,608 posts
Armorama: 3,092 posts
Posted: Monday, March 01, 2010 - 08:40 AM UTC
Yeah, ah, "stream of consciousness" writing doesn't translate well in posts...
I take it you want to build all of the M3/M4 variants powered by the Chrysler A57 multibank engine. You also want to include various wheel and bogie styles.
I suggest you locate a copy of "Sherman" by R.P. Hunnicutt (inter-library loan) and MMiR's "Modelers Guide To The Sherman" (eBay). All of your questions are covered in these two publications.
I take it you want to build all of the M3/M4 variants powered by the Chrysler A57 multibank engine. You also want to include various wheel and bogie styles.
I suggest you locate a copy of "Sherman" by R.P. Hunnicutt (inter-library loan) and MMiR's "Modelers Guide To The Sherman" (eBay). All of your questions are covered in these two publications.
phanthomred4
Texas, United States
Joined: May 28, 2009
KitMaker: 158 posts
Armorama: 90 posts
Joined: May 28, 2009
KitMaker: 158 posts
Armorama: 90 posts
Posted: Monday, March 01, 2010 - 11:46 AM UTC
Well, Yes, there a a lot of questions out in the open and the general consenses, the expert is elsewhere, thanx anyway. The book was already written and again, thanx SSGtoms!
HeavyArty
Florida, United States
Joined: May 16, 2002
KitMaker: 17,694 posts
Armorama: 13,742 posts
Joined: May 16, 2002
KitMaker: 17,694 posts
Armorama: 13,742 posts
Posted: Monday, March 01, 2010 - 12:07 PM UTC
If you actually ask a question or two, as opposed to incoherent rambling, there are experts here who can answer them and provide great information. Not that I am one of them (on this subject), but there are many here.
jowady
Joined: June 12, 2006
KitMaker: 1,027 posts
Armorama: 683 posts
KitMaker: 1,027 posts
Armorama: 683 posts
Posted: Monday, March 01, 2010 - 03:52 PM UTC
Okay, I am confused. Are you trying to make every vehicle type powered by the Chrysler engine configuartion? If you are you are limited to the M3A4 medium, the M4A4 (Sherman V in British service), and the Sherman VC Firefly. The M12 and M7 HMC were powered by the Continental radial engine. Production of the M3A4 was limited to a two month run of 109 vehicles. I don't know of any that were converted to Grants, as they were obsolescent when placed in production.
ericadeane
Michigan, United States
Joined: October 28, 2002
KitMaker: 4,021 posts
Armorama: 3,947 posts
Joined: October 28, 2002
KitMaker: 4,021 posts
Armorama: 3,947 posts
Posted: Monday, March 01, 2010 - 05:42 PM UTC
I didn't have the patience to read the OP. However, some US units involved in the Dragoon landings got replacement Shermans from UK stocks of M4A4s. I have one built up and ready for April's AMPS show upcoming.
jowady
Joined: June 12, 2006
KitMaker: 1,027 posts
Armorama: 683 posts
KitMaker: 1,027 posts
Armorama: 683 posts
Posted: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 - 04:40 AM UTC
Quoted Text
I didn't have the patience to read the OP. However, some US units involved in the Dragoon landings got replacement Shermans from UK stocks of M4A4s. I have one built up and ready for April's AMPS show upcoming.
3rd Army evidently picked up some M4A4s during the tank shortage after the Bulge, and of course some Sherman VCs were produced for IIRC 9th Army (although apparently never issued.)
phanthomred4
Texas, United States
Joined: May 28, 2009
KitMaker: 158 posts
Armorama: 90 posts
Joined: May 28, 2009
KitMaker: 158 posts
Armorama: 90 posts
Posted: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 - 04:41 AM UTC
Let''s see if I can fine tune this. I only want to build one or two M-3A4s. What road wheel type is most common? Is there any big differents in the turret (size/shape)? Who used them in combat, you know, which theater, WHICH ally, etc. Oh, and I do think the rancor can be dropped in an Adult fashion if you would so kind! Individually, some of you have helped a great deal, Thanx.
phanthomred4
Texas, United States
Joined: May 28, 2009
KitMaker: 158 posts
Armorama: 90 posts
Joined: May 28, 2009
KitMaker: 158 posts
Armorama: 90 posts
Posted: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 - 04:55 AM UTC
II RC ? As in II(2) Recon Company, 9th army
phanthomred4
Texas, United States
Joined: May 28, 2009
KitMaker: 158 posts
Armorama: 90 posts
Joined: May 28, 2009
KitMaker: 158 posts
Armorama: 90 posts
Posted: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 - 05:00 AM UTC
Regarding the M-7s and the M-12s (any engine). Where some rebuilt as such from exess M-3s (@ ordenance depots) or where they new builds??
ericadeane
Michigan, United States
Joined: October 28, 2002
KitMaker: 4,021 posts
Armorama: 3,947 posts
Joined: October 28, 2002
KitMaker: 4,021 posts
Armorama: 3,947 posts
Posted: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 - 05:05 AM UTC
The M7 and M12s shared components with the M3 but no M3s were actually converted.
flipper21
Delaware, United States
Joined: October 29, 2006
KitMaker: 268 posts
Armorama: 144 posts
Joined: October 29, 2006
KitMaker: 268 posts
Armorama: 144 posts
Posted: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 - 05:17 AM UTC
Hi Michael, IIRC stands for If I Remember Correctly.......Vince
ALBOWIE
New South Wales, Australia
Joined: February 28, 2006
KitMaker: 1,605 posts
Armorama: 1,565 posts
Joined: February 28, 2006
KitMaker: 1,605 posts
Armorama: 1,565 posts
Posted: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 - 11:51 AM UTC
The M3A4 has the M3 Bogies with Spoked roadwheels in the only photos I've seen of them which were all statestide training vehicles. AFAIK they were never supplied via lend lease. As for the M4A4 the US used them in a provincial Company in Burma later turning them over to the Chinese. These had the Spoked and pressed steel wheel types. As others have said a handful were used in Southern France during Dragoon and possibly some were supplied after the Bulge from British Stock although the only pic I have seen of these were the M4A2's also turned over.
The M4A4 track tended to be the Chrysler T62 metal chevron in the majority of cases. It is very rare to find one without and if you do it tends to be T48 Rubber Chevron and its usually on a UK Firefly.
Al
The M4A4 track tended to be the Chrysler T62 metal chevron in the majority of cases. It is very rare to find one without and if you do it tends to be T48 Rubber Chevron and its usually on a UK Firefly.
Al
jowady
Joined: June 12, 2006
KitMaker: 1,027 posts
Armorama: 683 posts
KitMaker: 1,027 posts
Armorama: 683 posts
Posted: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 - 01:31 PM UTC
Quoted Text
The M3A4 has the M3 Bogies with Spoked roadwheels in the only photos I've seen of them which were all statestide training vehicles.
Al
With respect, according to Hunnicut's M4 book, the M3A4s had early M4 style bogies. The pilot model had the M3 suspension, it was tested at Aberdeen.
ericadeane
Michigan, United States
Joined: October 28, 2002
KitMaker: 4,021 posts
Armorama: 3,947 posts
Joined: October 28, 2002
KitMaker: 4,021 posts
Armorama: 3,947 posts
Posted: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 - 04:22 PM UTC
Al: having looked at many Firefly VC pics, I find that T54E1 tracks weren't too uncommon.
ALBOWIE
New South Wales, Australia
Joined: February 28, 2006
KitMaker: 1,605 posts
Armorama: 1,565 posts
Joined: February 28, 2006
KitMaker: 1,605 posts
Armorama: 1,565 posts
Posted: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 - 06:52 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Quoted TextThe M3A4 has the M3 Bogies with Spoked roadwheels in the only photos I've seen of them which were all statestide training vehicles.
Al
With respect, according to Hunnicut's M4 book, the M3A4s had early M4 style bogies. The pilot model had the M3 suspension, it was tested at Aberdeen.
As I said" in the photos I have seen". My references indicate that a lot of later features such as the deletion of the hull doors and the M4 Heavy duty suspension was fitted and I only have a factory shot of that. There is a well known photo of a line of M4 and M3 mediums including a few m4A3's in US stateside training that I do not have access to at the moment. These from memory had the M3 bogies also. I do have an official ordnance photo with the M4 bogies and it also has no side doors and the M3 gun.
Al
UncaBret
Illinois, United States
Joined: May 11, 2008
KitMaker: 767 posts
Armorama: 672 posts
Joined: May 11, 2008
KitMaker: 767 posts
Armorama: 672 posts
Posted: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 - 03:12 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Oh, and I do think the rancor can be dropped in an Adult fashion if you would so kind! .
Get a lot of that here.
jowady
Joined: June 12, 2006
KitMaker: 1,027 posts
Armorama: 683 posts
KitMaker: 1,027 posts
Armorama: 683 posts
Posted: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 - 04:20 AM UTC
[quote][quote]
The M3A4 with the M3 bogies would have been, according to Hunnicut, the prototype. By the time production began, in I think April or May of 42, the M3A4 had all the late features of the M3riveted hull series, including deletion of the hull doors, M4 type "heavy duty" bogies, and the three ventilators on the hull top, as well as the M3 gun. In June, the factory making the M3A4s switched over to M4A4s. One wonders why the M3A4 was placed in production at all. I think that you are correct that all production was used for stateside training.
Quoted Text
As I said" in the photos I have seen". My references indicate that a lot of later features such as the deletion of the hull doors and the M4 Heavy duty suspension was fitted and I only have a factory shot of that. There is a well known photo of a line of M4 and M3 mediums including a few m4A3's in US stateside training that I do not have access to at the moment. These from memory had the M3 bogies also. I do have an official ordnance photo with the M4 bogies and it also has no side doors and the M3 gun.
Al
The M3A4 with the M3 bogies would have been, according to Hunnicut, the prototype. By the time production began, in I think April or May of 42, the M3A4 had all the late features of the M3riveted hull series, including deletion of the hull doors, M4 type "heavy duty" bogies, and the three ventilators on the hull top, as well as the M3 gun. In June, the factory making the M3A4s switched over to M4A4s. One wonders why the M3A4 was placed in production at all. I think that you are correct that all production was used for stateside training.
phanthomred4
Texas, United States
Joined: May 28, 2009
KitMaker: 158 posts
Armorama: 90 posts
Joined: May 28, 2009
KitMaker: 158 posts
Armorama: 90 posts
Posted: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 - 04:54 AM UTC
Gottcha
phanthomred4
Texas, United States
Joined: May 28, 2009
KitMaker: 158 posts
Armorama: 90 posts
Joined: May 28, 2009
KitMaker: 158 posts
Armorama: 90 posts
Posted: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 - 04:56 AM UTC
Thanx Al, exactly the the stuff I was looking for ( working@). Many thanx. It seems the things you mentioned compare well w/ the Acad M-36. Yaz, I know "another fish for the frying pan",ha,ha,ha.
phanthomred4
Texas, United States
Joined: May 28, 2009
KitMaker: 158 posts
Armorama: 90 posts
Joined: May 28, 2009
KitMaker: 158 posts
Armorama: 90 posts
Posted: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 - 05:06 AM UTC
Hey uncabret, Welcome. As for your post, it doesn't matter, but thanx for the reply, the thread is moving nicely, even if I'm being clued in on things already discuss. I wantta know!