_GOTOBOTTOM
Armor/AFV: British Armor
Discuss all types of British Armor of all eras.
Hosted by Darren Baker
M4 Sherman Hybrid I
AlanL
Visit this Community
England - East Anglia, United Kingdom
Joined: August 12, 2005
KitMaker: 14,499 posts
Armorama: 11,675 posts
Posted: Friday, March 05, 2010 - 05:33 AM UTC
Hi guys,

One I started about 2 years ago, which I think I can say is now done:

Vehicle represent an M4 Sherman Hybrid I from 144th Royal Armoured Corps, 33rd Armoured Division.











A coupel of possible crew:





Tank was based on the old DML IC Firefly hull with Tamiya leftover parts and DML indi tracks. Figures are the Ultracast ones.

Al
jjumbo
Visit this Community
British Columbia, Canada
Joined: August 27, 2006
KitMaker: 2,012 posts
Armorama: 1,949 posts
Posted: Friday, March 05, 2010 - 05:55 AM UTC
Hey Al,
Great job on your Sherman, looks nice and "scruffy" !
Are you going to do one with the high bustle turret and the loaders hatch ?
As to crew, I prefer the guy with the beret.
Never did like the looks of the AC helmet, it makes me think Tour de France !!
Anyway, more pics would be appreciated !!!
Cheers

jjumbo
calvin_ng
Visit this Community
United States
Joined: June 23, 2008
KitMaker: 1,024 posts
Armorama: 753 posts
Posted: Friday, March 05, 2010 - 05:59 AM UTC
Alan, i always like how you paint your afvs come out dull and well used, gives it the "look" to me. Your figure painting is as always, great.
AlanL
Visit this Community
England - East Anglia, United Kingdom
Joined: August 12, 2005
KitMaker: 14,499 posts
Armorama: 11,675 posts
Posted: Friday, March 05, 2010 - 06:05 AM UTC
Hi John,

Do you mean one like this a Mk II late??



Hi Calvin,

Many thanks I just realised I stll have a small tarp to add!!

Cheers guys.

Al
jjumbo
Visit this Community
British Columbia, Canada
Joined: August 27, 2006
KitMaker: 2,012 posts
Armorama: 1,949 posts
Posted: Friday, March 05, 2010 - 06:38 AM UTC
Hey Al,
Yeah, very similar to your Mk. II but with the large driver's/asst. driver's hatches, the high bustle turret with oval loader's hatch.
As I mentioned in my PM, I've read about Sherman Firefly Hybrids with the HB turret and oval loader's hatch.
Cheers

jjumbo
AlanL
Visit this Community
England - East Anglia, United Kingdom
Joined: August 12, 2005
KitMaker: 14,499 posts
Armorama: 11,675 posts
Posted: Friday, March 05, 2010 - 06:41 AM UTC
Hi John,

I shall have a look, a possible for the future, although I still have to build the Firefly Ic first.

Cheers

Al
ALBOWIE
Visit this Community
New South Wales, Australia
Joined: February 28, 2006
KitMaker: 1,605 posts
Armorama: 1,565 posts
Posted: Friday, March 05, 2010 - 07:07 PM UTC
[quote]Hey Al,
Yeah, very similar to your Mk. II but with the large driver's/asst. driver's hatches, the high bustle turret with oval loader's hatch.
As I mentioned in my PM, I've read about Sherman Firefly Hybrids with the HB turret and oval loader's hatch.
Cheers

See my response below - I was exhausted when i wrote this one and a clear head in the morning showed what a muddled response it was.
Al
ppawlak1
Visit this Community
Victoria, Australia
Joined: March 14, 2006
KitMaker: 1,973 posts
Armorama: 1,843 posts
Posted: Friday, March 05, 2010 - 08:16 PM UTC
Great work Al !

Those Ultracast fig's looks great as usual !

Looking forward to seeing more of your work in our Sherman Campaign

Cheers

Paul
AlanL
Visit this Community
England - East Anglia, United Kingdom
Joined: August 12, 2005
KitMaker: 14,499 posts
Armorama: 11,675 posts
Posted: Friday, March 05, 2010 - 08:25 PM UTC
Hi Paul,

Many thanks for the kind comments. The Ultracst figures are really good. I'm looking fiorward to the campaign, just getting in a bit of practice and finishing off a couple of builds that have been sitting around for a few years lol, lol.

Hi Al,

Just a question for clarification, are you saying that the turret on the Hybrid I should have cheek armour? I don't recall it being mentioned at the time of the build but I can add some if necessary. It did come up when I did the Mk II and I added it to that build:



Cheers guys.

Al
jjumbo
Visit this Community
British Columbia, Canada
Joined: August 27, 2006
KitMaker: 2,012 posts
Armorama: 1,949 posts
Posted: Friday, March 05, 2010 - 08:57 PM UTC

Quoted Text

I don't think you will find one with the large Hull hatches. Whilst a couple of pics of this rare hull type (for 75mm Armed A1's) have emerged of US ones but I've never seen a Brit one. Also I've never seen a Brit Hybrid wit hthe HB turret with Loaders hatch that WASN'T a Firefly. They probably held those back specifically for Firefly Conversion. The only Turrets you ever see on Brit Hybrids (75) is the Mid Low Bustle with Cheek and no pistol port. The M4A1's can be seen with the HB turret but small hatch hulls still. They always tend to have cast in Armour on the hull sides
Al



Hey Al B,
I mentioned in a PM to Alan L that Concord's "British Tanks of WWII (1) France & Belgium" has a picture on page 13 of a column of Sherman I's and II's being tested for waterproofing.
The 3rd vehicle is a Sherman I Hybrid with a 75mm, large driver's/asst. driver's hatches and an oval loader's hatch.
You can just make out the loader's head sticking out through the hatch.
The only things you can't tell is if it has a low or high bustle turret or the shell/pistol port.
Cheers.

jjumbo
ALBOWIE
Visit this Community
New South Wales, Australia
Joined: February 28, 2006
KitMaker: 1,605 posts
Armorama: 1,565 posts
Posted: Saturday, March 06, 2010 - 11:18 AM UTC

Quoted Text



Hi Al,

Just a question for clarification, are you saying that the turret on the Hybrid I should have cheek armour? I don't recall it being mentioned at the time of the build but I can add some if necessary. It did come up when I did the Mk II and I added it to that build:



Cheers guys.

Al




Sorry Guys, I've just have a friend point out my muddled post which I can I can only put down to extreme fatigue and carelessness. I'll answer both yours and John's post in this whilst correcting my posts muddled text.

The Low Bustle turrets on Brit 75mm Hybrids would all have the cast reinforced cast cheek and the majority of photos with the exception of Johns one mentioned above are the mid production type with cast cheek and no pistol port.
Johns Photo is an interesting one and unfortunately we cant see enough detail to determine whether it is a high bustle or low bustle type but it definately has a loaders hatch.

The rare big hatch m4A1 75 is an interesting thing. Debate rages as to whether these were ever used as gun tanks and I have seen photos of at least two US ones that were as such (one in 44 and one in 45) and not defrocked DD. There are a lot of UK 8AB Large hatch DD M4A1 75s (defrocked) and quite few of these show up in photos (See IWM B8588 below).


This one is believed to be in Canadian Service during Operation Totalize and this photo has been used to claim that it is in fact a IIb which we all know never existed:

To this date I have never seen a Large Hatch 75 M4A1 in UK (or Commonwealth) service that wasn't a defrocked DD. Going by the Photo John mentions there are always exceptions but in the absense of photos I reserve judgement.

A search of Missing Lynx Allied Forum under the title large Hatch M4A1 75 should find all the previous threads that have covered this little documented variant and unearth the various photos.
Thanks Liefe for Pointing out my muddled post and even more muddled correction
AlanL
Visit this Community
England - East Anglia, United Kingdom
Joined: August 12, 2005
KitMaker: 14,499 posts
Armorama: 11,675 posts
Posted: Sunday, March 07, 2010 - 02:08 AM UTC
Hi Al,

Thanks for the reply. It would apear then that I haev some work to do on the turret by adding some cheek armour and the same for the one below a Mk I as both have no pistol port.

First the fix on the stowage on the Hybrid:



Next progress on the Mk I, have added the stowage and cable.













Cheers

Al
AlanL
Visit this Community
England - East Anglia, United Kingdom
Joined: August 12, 2005
KitMaker: 14,499 posts
Armorama: 11,675 posts
Posted: Monday, March 08, 2010 - 04:26 AM UTC
Lots of interest here .

Right the Cheek Armour

Pic A slightly thicker



Pic B not so thick



Both



Which do you think is closer to the real thing?

Thanks

Al
ALBOWIE
Visit this Community
New South Wales, Australia
Joined: February 28, 2006
KitMaker: 1,605 posts
Armorama: 1,565 posts
Posted: Monday, March 08, 2010 - 08:08 AM UTC
Nice Stowage and I think the left top is closer as it blends to the curve but the bottom looks more correct on the right. I also believe either would look fine painted
Al
AlanL
Visit this Community
England - East Anglia, United Kingdom
Joined: August 12, 2005
KitMaker: 14,499 posts
Armorama: 11,675 posts
Posted: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 - 04:06 AM UTC
Hi Al,

Thanks for the feedback.

Al
phantom_phanatic309
#372
Visit this Community
United Kingdom
Joined: March 10, 2010
KitMaker: 2,568 posts
Armorama: 423 posts
Posted: Friday, March 12, 2010 - 07:25 AM UTC
What are the chances that any big hatch M4A1's delivered to British and Commonwealth forces were not converted to DD's?
Its quite possible that some might have been about but were VERY rare, hence a lack of photographs. Ludovic Fortins 'British Tanks in Normandy' staes quite rightly that Sherman V's (M4A4's) were the most common and therefore the most photographed. Only 942 M4A1's were delivered to Britain during the war, with just over 2000 M4's, 5000 M4A2's and nearly 7200 M4A4's. So little wonder no one has yet dug up a photo, if indeed they were used.
AlanL
Visit this Community
England - East Anglia, United Kingdom
Joined: August 12, 2005
KitMaker: 14,499 posts
Armorama: 11,675 posts
Posted: Friday, March 12, 2010 - 08:26 AM UTC
Hi Stephen,

Never say never with Shermans There are records showing 30 (I think) M4A3s Sherman Mk IVs being back loaded in Italy, unfortunately not arrtibuted to a specific unit.

How things stand at the moment: A bit more sanding to do:





Al
ALBOWIE
Visit this Community
New South Wales, Australia
Joined: February 28, 2006
KitMaker: 1,605 posts
Armorama: 1,565 posts
Posted: Friday, March 12, 2010 - 11:14 AM UTC

Quoted Text

Hi Stephen,

Never say never with Shermans There are records showing 30 (I think) M4A3s Sherman Mk IVs being back loaded in Italy, unfortunately not arrtibuted to a specific unit.

How things stand at the moment: A bit more sanding to do:





Al



I think the Cheek needs a bit more smoothing and fairing in on the trailing edge. Looking good though
Cheers
Al
phantom_phanatic309
#372
Visit this Community
United Kingdom
Joined: March 10, 2010
KitMaker: 2,568 posts
Armorama: 423 posts
Posted: Friday, March 12, 2010 - 11:31 AM UTC



Shermans can be a bloody nightmare to research so I dont rule out the possibility. Its like Sherman 76's, the British Army apparently used them but I've yet to see one in a photo (if anyone can point me to one I'd be grateful). I think this ones a de-frocked DD looking at it a little more closely. It has the same rear idler wheel. If so its had almost all its DD equipment removed. Pity the cloud of dust is hiding the rear we might have been able to get a look at its rear to confirm.

I might have a go at doing one of these with the leftovers for my M32B3 kit bash. Thats of course assuming they didnt all have HVSS. Those plans might be scuppered if they did.

Pretty good models you got there.
ALBOWIE
Visit this Community
New South Wales, Australia
Joined: February 28, 2006
KitMaker: 1,605 posts
Armorama: 1,565 posts
Posted: Friday, March 12, 2010 - 04:04 PM UTC
There is no doubt that that is an ex DD, the rear idler is the giveaway. Here are a few photos of Brit M4A1 76's in Italy:
9 Hussars

2 RTR


Have a Look through Concord 7062 British Sherman Tanks

Cheers
Al
phantom_phanatic309
#372
Visit this Community
United Kingdom
Joined: March 10, 2010
KitMaker: 2,568 posts
Armorama: 423 posts
Posted: Saturday, March 13, 2010 - 10:27 PM UTC
Nice one, cheers. Ive got an excuse to buy one.
I'll have a look around for that book too.
phantom_phanatic309
#372
Visit this Community
United Kingdom
Joined: March 10, 2010
KitMaker: 2,568 posts
Armorama: 423 posts
Posted: Saturday, March 13, 2010 - 10:39 PM UTC

9 Hussars

Al
[/quote]

Just had a look on hannants website and Bison Decals do a sheet which has markings for this one!
AlanL
Visit this Community
England - East Anglia, United Kingdom
Joined: August 12, 2005
KitMaker: 14,499 posts
Armorama: 11,675 posts
Posted: Sunday, March 14, 2010 - 01:13 AM UTC
Hi Stephen,

Have fun, always appreciate any Sherman input and discussion, but you've kinda highacked my thread which is not that helpful to me.

Enjoy your build.

Al

phantom_phanatic309
#372
Visit this Community
United Kingdom
Joined: March 10, 2010
KitMaker: 2,568 posts
Armorama: 423 posts
Posted: Sunday, March 14, 2010 - 01:21 PM UTC
Sorry dude, I think I let myself get a little carried away there.
I'm enjoying your build though its good work and I've found both your models and the advice you guys have given me a big help.
AlanL
Visit this Community
England - East Anglia, United Kingdom
Joined: August 12, 2005
KitMaker: 14,499 posts
Armorama: 11,675 posts
Posted: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 - 04:50 AM UTC
Hi Guys,

About done, thanks for all the additonal help.

M4 Sherman Hybrid I







M4 Sherman Mk I







Al
 _GOTOTOP