I have heard that all Tigers had CrossesMost, but not all. Some Tigers were completely void of a Balkenkreuz.
UP UNITL EARLY 1944 I HAVE NOT SEEN ANY TIGERS IN PHOTO'S OF sPz Abt.505 WITH ANY BALKENKREUZ. ..... THERE ARE ABOUT 30 PHOTO'S OF 505's TIGER 1's IN THE BOOK TIGER IN COMBAT VOL.1 AND ONLY ONE HAD THE CROSS ON IT IN 1944. ...BEFORE THIS NONE OF THEIR ( early production ) TIGER I's CARRIED BALKENKREUZ
I have this exact model (stab # 312 ) sitting here on my shelf. Tiger "312 " was NOT a Stabs Tiger ( Stab means Staff / HQ ) Tiger 312 was the number 2 tank in the 1st platoon of the 3rd kompanie. ( 300 & 301 were the Stab Tigers of the 3.kompanie )
The bakenkruz are located centered on the hull mid way between the top of the hull and the track skirts, just as on other Tiger'sThe Balkenkreuz was placed where the crew wanted it. So it was not like " just like on other Tigers " Some were placed further left or right of center on the side hull, some center. Same goes for those on the turret
according to Panzer Colors III the color of the horse-garment was related to the secondary camouflage color used (besides the dark yellow).
If the secondary color was brown, the horse-garment was brown, if the secondary color was green, the horse-garment would be green...That is just a total falsehood. As far as Panzer Color series of book's, their reference is not 100% completely accurate. As a matter of fact, Tom Jentz and a few other " top notch " Tiger researchers / historians "mock " Panzer Color book's, because of their inaccurate references. .............If you want ACCURATE info, ref's and histories on Tiger I & Tiger II tanks gets book's by Tom Jentz and Wolfgang Scheider. You get what you pay for.
TIGER "312 " from sPz Abt 505
- ralph