If they did really engage in an one on one battle, which vehicle would prevail?
Could it have happened during OIF? Just getting my imagination running.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7c82f/7c82f134bfe0c3df4d4c21fc59128955541a3be2" alt=""
Let me know what your thoughts are.
It works for OEF very well. There are still a lot of BTR 80s on the sides of the road leftover from previous battles. A stryker could be passing by one very easily.
Good what if idea....Did or do the Iraqis used the BTR-80A?
Looking at the weapon systems on the BTR-80A and the basic Stryker M1126 I would dare to say that the BTR-80A would win the engagement. The 2A72 30mm cannon on the BTR-80A has a range against armour of between 1500 m and 2000 m.....it would be engaging the Stryker effectively before the Stryker .50 Cal or Mk.19 would have any effect at all.
If you can wait a few weeks, I'll send you a photo of just such a BTR in Afghanistan. In fact, there's a sign by it with a mural depicting how it, and several other vehicles met their demise that day. Unfortunately it is home on my external drive.
Did or do the Iraqis used the BTR-80A?
Quoted TextDid or do the Iraqis used the BTR-80A?
No and the Soviets did not use it Afganistan. You could have a Stryker going past a regular BTR-80 in Afganistan, but not a Soviet BTR-80A.
![]() |