A week or two, I published a series of images ofrom Masterbox on a New set In-Progress. Here''s the Update and it''s good News for Post-War Soviet enthusiasts.
Link to Item
If you have comments or questions please post them here.
Thanks!
Figures
Military figures of all shapes and sizes.
Military figures of all shapes and sizes.
Hosted by Darren Baker, Mario Matijasic
NEWS
Masterbox Soviet Tankers (Part #2)jimbrae
Provincia de Lugo, Spain / Espaņa
Joined: April 23, 2003
KitMaker: 12,927 posts
Armorama: 9,486 posts
Joined: April 23, 2003
KitMaker: 12,927 posts
Armorama: 9,486 posts
Posted: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 - 04:27 AM UTC
Posted: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 - 04:58 AM UTC
Well done MasterBox it is good to see some manufacturers that listen to their customers, and a suggestion that broadens the appeal of their products.
Petition2God
Colorado, United States
Joined: February 06, 2002
KitMaker: 1,526 posts
Armorama: 1,294 posts
Joined: February 06, 2002
KitMaker: 1,526 posts
Armorama: 1,294 posts
Posted: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 - 06:37 AM UTC
Looks very very nice! I want to get a set!
Finch
New York, United States
Joined: August 03, 2005
KitMaker: 411 posts
Armorama: 273 posts
Joined: August 03, 2005
KitMaker: 411 posts
Armorama: 273 posts
Posted: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 - 10:05 AM UTC
Quoted Text
A week or two, I published a series of images ofrom Masterbox on a New set In-Progress. Here''s the Update and it''s good News for Post-War Soviet enthusiasts.
[/img]
Except that they have early-WW2 uniforms on. These guys would work for the late 1930s through maybe 1943. Are you sure we're talking about the correct set?
goldnova72
Alberta, Canada
Joined: February 21, 2009
KitMaker: 627 posts
Armorama: 592 posts
Joined: February 21, 2009
KitMaker: 627 posts
Armorama: 592 posts
Posted: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 - 01:46 PM UTC
I'ld rather MB released both the 4 and 5 man crews . I'm not too worried about 100% uniform accuracy ,( and the cat don't care ) I just need a lot more crews for my T-34s .Getting tired of hacking up all those Tamiya figures.
I think some of the guys were hoping for extra heads wearing a later (1950s ? ) style helmet .
I think some of the guys were hoping for extra heads wearing a later (1950s ? ) style helmet .
vonHengest
Texas, United States
Joined: June 29, 2010
KitMaker: 5,854 posts
Armorama: 4,817 posts
Joined: June 29, 2010
KitMaker: 5,854 posts
Armorama: 4,817 posts
Posted: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 - 05:11 PM UTC
Quoted Text
I think some of the guys were hoping for extra heads wearing a later (1950s ? ) style helmet .
Correct
Finch
New York, United States
Joined: August 03, 2005
KitMaker: 411 posts
Armorama: 273 posts
Joined: August 03, 2005
KitMaker: 411 posts
Armorama: 273 posts
Posted: Friday, January 21, 2011 - 01:24 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Quoted Text
I think some of the guys were hoping for extra heads wearing a later (1950s ? ) style helmet .
Correct
OK, but a 1950s style helmet on a pre-1943 uniform is still not quite right. Close, but not right.....
goldnova72
Alberta, Canada
Joined: February 21, 2009
KitMaker: 627 posts
Armorama: 592 posts
Joined: February 21, 2009
KitMaker: 627 posts
Armorama: 592 posts
Posted: Friday, January 21, 2011 - 02:34 PM UTC
I think the 5 figure set that was shown about a week ago had later war uniforms (, they were sitting on a T-34 / 85). Would they , be correct for the 50/60s with a change in headgear
Tarok
Victoria, Australia
Joined: July 28, 2004
KitMaker: 10,889 posts
Armorama: 3,245 posts
Joined: July 28, 2004
KitMaker: 10,889 posts
Armorama: 3,245 posts
Posted: Friday, January 21, 2011 - 03:05 PM UTC
This isn't an update of the previously previewed set, it's a completely different set - this one is a bail-out set, the other a mounted crew at rest. The bail-out set, this one, should be numbered 3569 and titled "Soviet Tankmen,1940-1943". The previously announced set is 3568 "Soviet Tankmen,1943-1945".
goldnova72
Alberta, Canada
Joined: February 21, 2009
KitMaker: 627 posts
Armorama: 592 posts
Joined: February 21, 2009
KitMaker: 627 posts
Armorama: 592 posts
Posted: Friday, January 21, 2011 - 03:48 PM UTC
Thanks for the clarification Tarok. Thought it was a little weird having both sets with the same number . I thought MB really decided to revamp their figures , from 5 to 4 ..
Why another bail out set , they did one already -#3532 ? Or is that one being discontinued ? Either way a big thank you to MB for all the great figure sets they have under development , and pls keep them coming. Jim
Why another bail out set , they did one already -#3532 ? Or is that one being discontinued ? Either way a big thank you to MB for all the great figure sets they have under development , and pls keep them coming. Jim