Charles Reading gives us his impressions of this book on the planning, buildup and battle of Kursk by author Mark Healy.
Link to Item
If you have comments or questions please post them here.
Thanks!
Armor/AFV
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
Hosted by Darren Baker, Mario Matijasic
REVIEW
Zitadelle by Mark HealyPosted: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 - 08:22 AM UTC
Whiskey_1
Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
Joined: November 22, 2008
KitMaker: 279 posts
Armorama: 272 posts
Joined: November 22, 2008
KitMaker: 279 posts
Armorama: 272 posts
Posted: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 - 09:29 AM UTC
I've had this book for two years and it is one of the few that I wanted to read a second time right after I had finished. It does a great job of clearing up a few things regarding Kursk and explaining. The one downside (in my humble opinion) is that the publisher did not allow room for endnotes. Nonetheless, it can't be beat as a good introduction into the matter, as well as inspire you to build something. The small print as mentioned was in my experience not a problem (to young eyes at least).
vonHengest
Texas, United States
Joined: June 29, 2010
KitMaker: 5,854 posts
Armorama: 4,817 posts
Joined: June 29, 2010
KitMaker: 5,854 posts
Armorama: 4,817 posts
Posted: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 - 06:10 PM UTC
I was not expecting what I read or saw when I clicked on the link. I can see why it would be hard to put down. I will definitely be checking this one out as soon as I get a chance, thanks Charles!
bill_c
Campaigns Administrator
New Jersey, United States
Joined: January 09, 2008
KitMaker: 10,553 posts
Armorama: 8,109 posts
Joined: January 09, 2008
KitMaker: 10,553 posts
Armorama: 8,109 posts
Posted: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 - 03:53 AM UTC
I'm always glad to learn about good books here, as they get lost amid the chaos and noise about new kits. Operation Citadel is underestimated in importance IMO, other than as "history's greatest/largest tank battle." It was the Third Reich's last major offensive, and broke the Wehrmacht's ability to wage war on the Eastern Front. Afterwards, it was a straight line to Berlin.
Stalingrad, which was obviously important, is treated as though it was the major turning point in the war. Yet Germany continued to attack afterwards. I understand that battle, but Kursk has always struck me as being a muddle like WW I battlefields: gigantic, but no coherence in the way they're explained.
Stalingrad, which was obviously important, is treated as though it was the major turning point in the war. Yet Germany continued to attack afterwards. I understand that battle, but Kursk has always struck me as being a muddle like WW I battlefields: gigantic, but no coherence in the way they're explained.