It don't have to be Fruils by the way, I can deal with resin or plastic link-by-link tracks.
Thanks on forehand!

I'd go with ATL-05 -- the earlier non-cleated tracks. Look at this thread
http://www.network54.com/Forum/47207/thread/1173271324/StuH+G+track+help+please-
Quoted TextI'd go with ATL-05 -- the earlier non-cleated tracks. Look at this thread
http://www.network54.com/Forum/47207/thread/1173271324/StuH+G+track+help+please-
I second that. For the first-batch Sturmi the Tamiya kit depicts, go with non-cleated tracks. Friul set ATL-04 is also good.
The later cleated type seems to appear mostly on the second-batch Stugs in wartime photos.
Finnish Stugs came with a whole bunch of different track types. Cleated and non-cleated, with open, solid, and notched guide teeth. It's not uncommon for wartime photos to show different types mixed on the same vehicle.
Naturally, museum vehicles tend to show a larger variety than back then in service use as parts are scrounged from multiple vehicles for restoration, but this photo is a good example of variation, showing four different styles of guide teeth: http://andreaslarka.net/ps531010/2004_53101007.jpg
![]()
Judging from this photo, it seems to have a early/middle type muzzle brake. (those early-mid-late designations seem to vary a bit from one manufacturer to another)
Several aftermarket manufacturers make Stug barrels. There are probably more, but these I could recall off the top of my head: Armorscale, RB Model and Aber.
If I'm not mistaken, Armorscale and RB Model barrels have mostly exactly the same metal parts, the latter having that resin mantlet, instruction sheet (which are downloadable from their website, very useful!) and of course a higher price tag.
![]()
Edit: sorry for that hassle in case you noticed, editing this post somehow make most of the text disappear...
![]() |