Darren Baker reviews "Red Army Tankers at Rest 1943 – 1945" from Stalingrad, a recently released resin figure set.
Link to Item
If you have comments or questions please post them here.
Thanks!
Figures
Military figures of all shapes and sizes.
Military figures of all shapes and sizes.
Hosted by Darren Baker, Mario Matijasic
REVIEW
Stalingrad Red Army Tankers at Restc5flies
California, United States
Joined: October 21, 2007
KitMaker: 3,684 posts
Armorama: 2,938 posts
Joined: October 21, 2007
KitMaker: 3,684 posts
Armorama: 2,938 posts
Posted: Sunday, August 14, 2011 - 01:42 PM UTC
Finch
New York, United States
Joined: August 03, 2005
KitMaker: 411 posts
Armorama: 273 posts
Joined: August 03, 2005
KitMaker: 411 posts
Armorama: 273 posts
Posted: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 - 01:11 PM UTC
If I may offer a few comments:
* The crew figures are wearing jackets that were issued only after Stalingrad, so, they are post-January 1943.
* Both wear officer's shirts. Recalling that they are shown posed on an IS-2 gun tube, the IS-2 crew normally consisted of two lieutenants and two sergeants. Not that they all really did - but that was what their TO&E called for.
* Since I can't see any branch insignia, you are indeed correct that the guy wearing the pilotka is not necessarily a tanker.
* Tankers certainly wore the soft pilotka cap when not crewing their vehicle. I would imagine it was a lot more comfortable than the helmet.
* All ranks wore decorations if they'd earned them.
I hope this is helpful.
* The crew figures are wearing jackets that were issued only after Stalingrad, so, they are post-January 1943.
* Both wear officer's shirts. Recalling that they are shown posed on an IS-2 gun tube, the IS-2 crew normally consisted of two lieutenants and two sergeants. Not that they all really did - but that was what their TO&E called for.
* Since I can't see any branch insignia, you are indeed correct that the guy wearing the pilotka is not necessarily a tanker.
* Tankers certainly wore the soft pilotka cap when not crewing their vehicle. I would imagine it was a lot more comfortable than the helmet.
* All ranks wore decorations if they'd earned them.
I hope this is helpful.
Posted: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 - 02:06 PM UTC
Danny firstly thank you for your input I am always happy to have further information offered up. Regarding the points you raise I will admit I missed the shirt type and was totally unaware about the crewing requirement of the IS-2. The shoulder strap would indicate a tank officer but there is nothing to indicate that he is a tank officer other than where he is sat. The other figure is most definitely a tank officer. If you look at picture 11 the epaulettes do possibly indicate a rank.
Finch
New York, United States
Joined: August 03, 2005
KitMaker: 411 posts
Armorama: 273 posts
Joined: August 03, 2005
KitMaker: 411 posts
Armorama: 273 posts
Posted: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 - 02:00 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Danny firstly thank you for your input I am always happy to have further information offered up. Regarding the points you raise I will admit I missed the shirt type and was totally unaware about the crewing requirement of the IS-2. The shoulder strap would indicate a tank officer but there is nothing to indicate that he is a tank officer other than where he is sat. The other figure is most definitely a tank officer. If you look at picture 11 the epaulettes do possibly indicate a rank.
You are absolutely correct that the shoulder boards have rank insignia of an officer (which is good since they're wearing officers' shirts) . But I don't see any branch insignia, so, again, we agree that the guy in the soft cap could be any branch. Could be an Infantryman for example.